Almost all of these can be classified
as obvious observations, actor identifications, or information that actual people or places from Jean - Do's life are used.
Not exact matches
GWBush is an
obvious, classic, text - book sociopath and
as such, is totally inconsistent with ever really being a «born again Christian»... to any objective
observation his actions proved that.
But the
obvious observation is that the Premier League lacks what you would describe
as a «super club».
Admittedly, some of it amusing, and in fact, when the cobbled - together screenplay by star Will Ferrell and director Adam McKay focuses on the silly workings of the news network in question, the movie has some satirical bite, even if the
observations are
as obvious as the joke of having the network's name be GNN.
An
obvious fan, Steves begins by giving a warm impression of B&B s in general and makes a number of pertinent
observations: «While B&B s often lack the conveniences of a hotel — such
as fancy lobbies, restaurants, and in - room phones — I happily make the trade - off for the personal touches that they do offer, whether it's joining my hosts for tea in the afternoon or relaxing by a common fireplace at the end of the day.
This may seem pretty
obvious (and trivial) from simple inspection of historical
observations, and indeed this drought is quite familiar to anyone who lived in California during the mid-1970s,
as I did.
Since, without free parameters, and parameterizations calibrated (or fudged, if you like) to match observed data (such
as it is), models (the principle means of attribution) are unable to replicate real world
observations, then the statement above is
obvious patent nonsense.
As to group think, my
observation is that history shows, from the stunt that the Skeptical inquirer pulled showing scientists falling for
obvious parlor tricks, to eugenics, to Piltdown's long reign, to Lysenkoism, to Eisenhower's farewell warning, that scientists are not immune to any of the foibles of the larger world.
If an argument depends on skipping certain
observations or emphasizes uncertainty while ignoring an
obvious trend, that's a clue you're being steered
as opposed to informed.
As you note «There is no
obvious similarity from 1910 -1940, so this
observation does not apply there ``.
When a continuing series of peak hottest years occurs every four or five years, each peak a little hotter than the last, then there is an
obvious temptation to view that particular metric
as being a more useful indicator of the validity of the AR5 climate models than would be the central trend of the
observations.
Such
observations are essential in identifying potential linear (
obvious)
as well
as nonlinear (subtle) mechanisms underlying the development of species - typical behavior.