Sentences with phrase «as old evidence»

The engraved limb could stand as the oldest evidence of humans engaging in ritual cannibalism, as Bello and her fellow Natural History Museum of London researchers reported today in PLOS ONE.

Not exact matches

Indeed, when confronted with the news that Apple had eclipsed Microsoft in market cap, CEO Steve Ballmer trumpeted the company's dominance in the PC market as evidence of its stability — which, says Bonner, «illustrates the old way of thinking.»

San Bruno police identified the shooter at YouTube's HQ as Nasim Aghdam, a 39 - year - old woman from San Diego, and said there is no evidence she knew the victims or that they were specifically targeted.

Prejudice against Jews is at least as old as 1654 in North America and its negative evidences may be found in the histories of most of the clubs and colleges and residential districts of the country.

The 33 - year - old billionaire instead insists that the real mistakes that were made by Cambridge Analytica happened years ago and that Facebook's 2014 policy change served as evidence that the social network had already taken steps to ensure that app developers didn't harvest and exploit too much user data.

Before this weekend, the evidence that 64 - year - old Xi might stay in power longer than the norm included the newest additions to his string of titles and descriptions, such as «leadership core» in 2016.

you really need to do your research on your boy jesus... that story is very old... and like all relgions, manifested... as for the existence of a god... you provide any evidence (and i mean any) then we can have a discussion... until then, your opinion is invalid... WHAT CAN BE ASSERTED WITHOUT PROOF CAN BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PROOF... HITCHENS

However, this does not imply some of the more ridiculous tenets of creationism (such as man walking with dinosaurs or the world being 6000 years old) should be objectively viewed as truth when all evidence points to evolution as fact.

Quotations from a 2000 year old book of sadistic fairy tales do not count as evidence of anything.

Where those who push «intelligent design» go wrong is they distort or deny real physical evidence to promote the notion that the earth is only 5000 years old and the world we see is as it was initially created.

I'm guessing you are not so stupid as to ignore all the fossil evidence, carbon dating, and light source definition from other planets and still believe that the earth is not millions of years old.

the law refers mostly to the torah (the first five books of the old testament), which serve no purpose in purifying christians, as evidenced by the fact that we christians no longer sacrifice rams.

Having examined evidence such as Big Bang cosmology (yup, I'm what you'd call an «old earth» creationist), the Cambrian explosion in the fossil record, the problems of abiogenesis, and textual criticism of the Bible, I've found that the Bible describes historical events and other aspects of reality much more plausibly than any other faith system.

Even if we were certain of the original meaning of the root underlying the Hebrew noun we could hardly take this as conclusive evidence of the basic understanding of the Old Testament prophet in the middle centuries of the first millenium B.C. Rather, we will have to understand the sense of the term nabi» from the person of the prophet himself as he appears and functions in the community of ancient Israel.

As feminists lifted to consciousness the age - old pattern of male domination and destroyed its self - evidence, they could call for a post-patriarchal society.

You are using some 2000 year old bronze age text as your evidence about the supernatural?

Reflection shows that the evidence for old - time sanctity comes from suspect sources such as hagiography, panegyrics and sermons.

Because last I checked there was still not a single shred of tangible, measurable, empirical evidence in support of any form of Theism, let alone something as backwards, corrupt, and atrocious, morally reprehensible (historically), and specific as Catholicism, which isn't even a very accurate form of Christianity when compared to the oldest Biblical scripts we've yet found.

-- somehow meteorites are used as confirming evidence the earth is 4.54 billion yrs old because evidence on earth can not be confirmed independently, so let's move to «indisputable» circular reasoning and say well if this meteorite is 4.54 billion years old then the earth must also be 4.54 billion years old, since the machine's measurements match.

You asked what FACTS I am referring to, well there are many FACTS such as the FACT that the earth is NOT 6000 years old, the FACT that there is NO evidence of a god, any god; the FACT that evolution is how we all got here; and the FACT that we were not CREATED by some sky daddy.

But old - line feminism still has a tin ear for listening to women with children, as evidenced by their main solution to the problem of combining work and family life: the socialization of child care.

It may be that the omission is due to circumstances which rob it of significance, yet the fact that the older sources in Samuel manifest the same oversight and that one goes on as far as the prophetic histories and then to the writing prophets for indubitable evidence of belief in a common ancestry strengthens the suspicion that things were not what later writers would have us believe.

The POTUS has a portrait hidden that ages as his appearance gets younger, evidenced by the «old» mug shot on the right.

If, as the evidence strongly suggests, the two most empirically verifiable aspects of our nature are original sin and the world's oldest belief system of «you shall be as....

These Evangelical Neanderthals are convinced, despite overwhelming evidence, that the earth is 7000 years old and species were created as they are now.

Discussions of science are based on nonscientific literature, Jesus is presented as the fulfillment of «Old Testament» prophecy, and archaeological findings are cited as evidence of Bible's complete historical accuracy.

That and hiding fossils that, for all the world, test as millions of years old, as well as a mountain of other evidence, if he's responsible for faking all of it then he is seriously twisted and not at all interested in «the truth.»

Ussher's work, from the mid-1600s, is widely cited by creationists as evidence that Earth is only a few thousand years old.

Then, some 18 months later, the Tel Dan Stela most unkindly brushed this silly, asinine myth aside...» As time passes, and archaeology develops, there are more reasons to take the Old Testament seriously as a witness to history and more evidence that the minimalist case is sheer prejudicAs time passes, and archaeology develops, there are more reasons to take the Old Testament seriously as a witness to history and more evidence that the minimalist case is sheer prejudicas a witness to history and more evidence that the minimalist case is sheer prejudice.

In reality however, the development of archaeology as a discipline has produced a wealth of material evidence for the essential reliability of the Old Testament.

(Jeremiah 15:15) Moreover, the saving efficacy of good lives in a community had been an implicit corollary of the old sense of social solidarity, as is picturesquely evidenced in Yahweh's consent to Abraham's argument that if there were even ten good men in Sodom it should not be destroyed.

Religion teaches nonsensical, 5,000 - year - old knowledge as fact, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary.

Colin, archaeological evidence supports a lot of the validity of various parts of the old testament that were suppose to be «magical» as well.

The influence of these older evolutionary cosmologies on Whitehead's thought, moreover, is never carefully examined so much as it is presupposed.1 Against such presuppositions, I shall argue here that evolution and evolutionist theories play no significant role in Whitehead's metaphysics, and that there is no evidence in his major works of any significant influence from earlier process - oriented «evolutionary cosmologies.»

Evidence may still be unearthed showing Old Testament prophecy as just that, prophecy.

Wanting to see the historical evidence for this, Yuval followed along as I pointed to a list of Messianic prophecies given in the Tanach (Old Testament) and their fulfillment in the B'rit Hadashah (New Testament).

When F. G. requested a stay on his deportation order, based on his conversion to Christianity, the migration board dismissed the evidence as old, and his case not worth reconsidering.

It seems that just weeks before the general election that old leftist rag, Time Magazine, has flushed out evidence of militant, right wing, militia types running around my neck of the woods: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2022516,00.html As it turns out about fifteen years....

Well, if you believe 2000 year old speculation over modern, evidence based, repeatable, testable science, then how would you react as President if some tragic event occurs and evangelicals are telling you it's the end of days?

As a christian apologist, Chad, has 2000 years of «facts and testimony» to draw on to defend the delusion, not to the degree of proof or evidence; only to the point that a whole lot of people bought into the scam, therefore the scam is true based on the bible, why, because a 2000 year old book, that very same bible says so, which completes the circle.

Or are you one of those people who believe the universe is a mere 7000 years old or whatever at the expense of ignoring all science and evidence as the lifespan of the earth?

I do not find his work to honest in its desire to find out historical truth or gather and examine evidence and question everything, but hastily seeks to tout his opinions and theories as a new (old) gospel, rather then add his observations, theories, and hypotheses to the growing pool of knowledge and speculation, and allow the evidence and theories to speak for themselves.

Evidence seems to suggest that which aromas we lose as we get older has to do with environmental exposure to pollutants or viruses.

The Blancos» signing of 28 - year - old Casilla — who arrives on a five - year contract — can be seen as firm evidence that Real are planning to do without De Gea, at least for this campaign.

As waterboy said, that is getting really old, especially considering that by and large the moves the Rockies have made over the last half decade have been positive, as evidenced by their wins and losseAs waterboy said, that is getting really old, especially considering that by and large the moves the Rockies have made over the last half decade have been positive, as evidenced by their wins and losseas evidenced by their wins and losses.

The 28 - year - old has established himself as one of the most prolific strikers in Europe during his spell with Borussia Dortmund, as evidenced last season with 40 goals in 46 games.

The 29 - year - old wasn't able to fully express himself with the Red Devils, as evidenced by his goals and assists dramatically falling from the standards he set at former club Borussia Dortmund.

I'm sorry if this came off as rant - y and I'm not trying to target you but it's getting old seeing this «KH can't draft» when clearly the evidence is that he's doing just fine.

Clueless, relying on a sugar daddy and of course old, fat and ugly as evidenced by the video... not class coming here to troll.

Based on this evidence, it shouldn't be very much longer as he kept the likes of Juan Mata and Anthony Martial on the bench at Old Trafford.