These are, of course, speculative frameworks, based as much on stylized notions of intellectual currents
as on factual evidence about either the past or the present.
Not exact matches
In response to Mormonism where is the
factual evidence from what this Faith is based
on: 1) Prove that reformed Eygptian is a true language 2) Provide a map showing the journey in American the Nephites and the Moronites took to establish themselves will validating their establisments 3) The Book of Abraham has been proven false so why is still accepted
as scripture 4) Joseph Smith was not a Jew or part of the tribe Levi, but believed that the rights of the priesthood was given to him.
Scientists have been able to provide
evidence for the Big Bang Theory, but not the singularity itself that the «big bang» spawned from... so Hawking's assumptions, are just that, assumptions and opinions... and he does not,
as you say «tell the truth» based
on a proven,
factual basis.
I am (a) A victim of child molestation (b) A r.ape victim trying to recover (c) A mental patient with paranoid delusions (d) A Christian The only discipline known to often cause people to kill others they have never met and / or to commit suicide in its furtherance is: (a) Architecture; (b) Philosophy; (c) Archeology; or (d) Religion What is it that most differentiates science and all other intellectual disciplines from religion: (a) Religion tells people not only what they should believe, but what they are morally obliged to believe
on pain of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in terms of doctrine and go where the
evidence leads them; (b) Religion can make a statement, such
as «there is a composite god comprised of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make
factual assertions when supported by considerable
evidence; (c) Science and the scientific method is universal and consistent all over the World whereas religion is regional and a person's religious conviction, no matter how deeply held, is clearly nothing more than an accident of birth; or (d) All of the above.
The proscription of terrorist organizations, including the application of criminal responsibility of its members, must be made
on the basis of
factual evidence of activities that are of a genuine terrorist nature
as well
as of the actual involvement of the individuals concerned.»
Taking «backfire effect»
as a starting point — a phrase coined to describe how people often maintain or even strengthen their beliefs when given
factual evidence against them — Tillmans has interviewed scientists, politicians, journalists, and social workers in an effort to understand the political climate in recent decades, with a particular focus
on right - wing populism and fake news.
Taking
as a starting point the «backfire effect» — a phrase coined to describe how people often maintain or even strengthen their beliefs when given
factual evidence against them — Tillmans interviewed scientists, politicians, journalists, and social workers in an effort to understand changes in the international political climate in recent decades, with a particular focus
on right - wing populism and fake news.
The Methodological Level: disputes over the rules to settle
factual disputes a) are in effect «rules of
evidence» b) serve
as a kind of «science court» in which a «verdict»
on factual disputes is resolved by appeal to «
evidence» c) this reflects the empiricist's commitment to the «Leibnizean ideal» d) explains how a «staggering proportion» of disputes are in fact resolved e) however, occasional disputes over the methodological rules arise 3.
An interesting ruling in the Administrative Court this week touches
on some issues fundamental to public law — the extent to which «macro» policy (such
as EC law) should trump principles of good administration; the role of
factual evidence in judicial review proceedings, and the connection between public law wrongs and liability in tort.
As a more practical point, the Court clearly placed reliance
on the
factual evidence provided by both parties, including the contemporaneous recordings of telephone conversations between Barclays and Thornbridge, and the oral
evidence given in Court.
If the district court decision relies
on factual underpinnings, however, such
as evidence concerning the «background science or the meaning of a term in the relevant art during the relevant time period -LSB-,]» it should make specific
factual findings and those findings are subject to review for clear error:
That parent will have a second opportunity to make their case for the proposed move at trial where they may well be in a position to adduce
evidence establishing that the present circumstances are having a deleterious impact
on the child's physical or emotional needs; and having lost their initial chambers application, the moving parent no doubt will come away from the experience
as a «dress rehearsal» having learned all the flaws and gaps in their
factual / legal presentation that they can improve upon and fill in for the trial judge.
[15] In this regard, I consider this kind of
factual evidence to be analogous to those matters described by Madam Justice Garson
as being «more in the nature of observations»
as opposed to inferences having complex interpretive or diagnostic components when she described how their inclusion in records sought to be admitted
as business records did not offend Rule 40A in Egli v. Egli, 2003 BCSC 1716 at para. 25 which was relied
on by the defendant in submissions.
On any view, said the judge, the
factual evidence in the report was admissible
as the
evidence was relevant; the fact that it was hearsay was not a ground for its exclusion.
As well as factual evidence, the report contained evidence of the opinions of experts on technical matters, which included aeronautical engineering, wreckage analysis, meteorology, pathology, analysis of flight data, and the piloting of aircraf
As well
as factual evidence, the report contained evidence of the opinions of experts on technical matters, which included aeronautical engineering, wreckage analysis, meteorology, pathology, analysis of flight data, and the piloting of aircraf
as factual evidence, the report contained
evidence of the opinions of experts
on technical matters, which included aeronautical engineering, wreckage analysis, meteorology, pathology, analysis of flight data, and the piloting of aircraft.
Citing McCamus, The Law of Contracts, (Toronto: Irwin Law Inc., 2005) at 711, the Court of Appeal was careful to point out that an investigation
as to
evidence of the surrounding circumstances or the surrounding
factual matrix is not dependent
on a finding the agreement is itself ambiguous.
re: overzealous litigant's bad behavior / canlii summaryIt may not be wise to accept
as fact everything that is published
on canlii.orgIn my case misinformation accepted
as factual evidence was compiledover several decades.