Not exact matches
The electronic age with its offering of a wide variety of ways to present the human voice has commanded new attention to
oral language.1 Perhaps the ascendancy of science and the domination of the scientific method has created such a restricted view of language that a reaction in favor of more dimensions to language is to be taken simply
as clear
testimony to a general degeneration of meaningful discourse, a degeneration in which the church figures prominently.
Written
testimony may be e-mailed
as an attachment in any common format to the Hudson Valley Delegation at: March 5th Hearing: Dan Moscato at [email protected] March 12th Hearing: Shelley Andrews at [email protected] Witnesses are asked to keep
oral testimony to no more than three minutes in length.
Her
oral confirmation
testimony earlier this month was a cringe - worthy performance, featuring guns vs. grizzlies and her refusal to commit to the same accountability standards for charter and private schools
as are in place for traditional public schools that receive taxpayer funds.
«Lawmakers stressed that their report — which was written after only a single day of
oral testimony — did not cover all the issues and would not be
as in - depth
as the two other inquiries into the e-mail scandal that are still pending.»
A generation brought up with computers will no longer have the attention span to sit
as jurors and listen to
oral testimony for hours on end, Lord Judge believes, according to a report in The Times Online.
With their
oral testimony often offered
as the only evidence to support their claims, and with few Asylum Officers, only 35 Fraud Detection and National Security officers assigned to asylum offices throughout the country, and a mere 316 Immigration Judges already overwhelmed by a backlog of 542,411 cases, it should be no surprise that the credible fear process is uniquely susceptible to fraud.»
27 (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), the Small Claims Court may admit
as evidence at a hearing and act upon any
oral testimony and any document or other thing so long
as the evidence is relevant to the subject - matter of the proceeding, but the court may exclude anything unduly repetitious.
As stated by Ontario's Divisional Court in Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113, 2007 CanLII 59152, this means that the manner in which evidence is received by the Board is within its discretion and there is no requirement that evidence be received in the form of
oral testimony.
As well as imprisonment, statutory duties to submit to fingerprinting, to produce documents, to give oral testimony and not to loiter in or near school grounds, playgrounds, public parks and bathing areas are all deprivations of liberty attracting the rules of fundamental justic
As well
as imprisonment, statutory duties to submit to fingerprinting, to produce documents, to give oral testimony and not to loiter in or near school grounds, playgrounds, public parks and bathing areas are all deprivations of liberty attracting the rules of fundamental justic
as imprisonment, statutory duties to submit to fingerprinting, to produce documents, to give
oral testimony and not to loiter in or near school grounds, playgrounds, public parks and bathing areas are all deprivations of liberty attracting the rules of fundamental justice.
The British Columbia Supreme Court gave little weight to email evidence in another family dispute, Hamilton v Jackson 2009 BCSC 538 (CanLII), because it conflicted with
oral testimony in court about what had happened and what had been said about it at the time, and,
as the judge said (para 17):
At the trial, several witnesses gave
oral testimony, including solicitors from Linklaters, though
as is not uncommon in cases where the trial is one of negligence of the solicitors concerned, several years had passed since the initial events in question.
The tenor of the SEC's stance on the broader ICO market appears to have changed, from hinting that the regulator views ICOs
as unregistered securities in violation of U.S. Securities laws to outright warning ICOs of an oncoming crackdown in written and
oral testimony.
Your depositions — formal statements, either
oral or written, that carry the same importance
as testimony in court — play a different role in a Virginia divorce, depending on whether the divorce is contested or not.
Given the gravity of the consequences flowing from a finding that a claimant group is not who they claim (and perceive themselves) to be, and consistent with principles of equality and respect for culture,
as well
as the intention of the Parliament in enacting the NTA «to rectify past injustices» and establish a «special procedure... for the just and proper ascertainment of native title rights and interests... in a manner that has due regard to their unique character», the Court should, it is respectfully submitted, approach the admission of
oral testimonies of native title claimants in ways which accommodate Aboriginal accounts of their histories [85] and are, where appropriate, sceptical in the receipt of written records of the past.