Sentences with phrase «as other books written»

Not exact matches

«We use vitamins as insurance policies against whatever else we might (or might not) be eating, as if by atoning for our other nutritional sins, vitamins can save us from ourselves,» Catherine Price, a science reporter, wrote in the book «Vitamania.»

If as an author your plans are to write the book and expect others to sell it... do not write the book.

As soon as you write a book, you have separated yourself from otherAs soon as you write a book, you have separated yourself from otheras you write a book, you have separated yourself from others.

Billionaire Mark Cuban, for example, has poo - poohed much of the doom and gloom and said that «TV is the new TV,» while media gadfly Michael Wolff has written an entire book about how television isn't being nearly as disrupted as other media industries.

As part of this campaign, I will develop a backer - only community where you can share your experiences, meet and learn from other backers, and interact with me and our entire team during the writing and research process of my next book.

They have written a book, Cartel Wives, telling their story as a lesson to others not to fall for the narco life, and they regret what they put their families through.

In addition to his own book, he regularly writes for the Huffington Post and the Financial Times, provides commentary for other news outlets, does television appearances, speaking engagements, consultations with politicians and everything else that comes from increasingly sharing a role as the «face» of the company with founder Bill Gross.

Specifically regarding SMS history and call logs, Facebook writes, «We also collect contact information if you choose to upload, sync or import it (such as an address book or call log or SMS log history), which we use for things like helping you and others find people you may know.»

IMHO, that makes it written around the same time as all the other books of the New Testament.

In order to reduce the need for war and conflict, and to improve conditions in impoverished countries, the USA should be distributing unlimited volumes of the Koran / Quran (as well as the Bible and other popular texts)-- but all the books should be written or translated into the languages of the local population.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

Of course there are other reasons for my sporadic blogging this year: a surprise new baby coming which completely disoriented us, a new book to finish writing (and I will share all about that in January), travelling and speaking all over North America, stewarding the message of Jesus Feminist throughout her first year of life, creating the Jesus Feminist collection with Imagine Goods, a trip to Haiti, new opportunities as a writer, three tinies at home with their own lives and drama and growth and change, remodelling parts of our home, marriage, church, friends, life, work, laundry (oh, can we talk laundry?!)

The same picture was in art books in our school library as were many other artworks of nudes but I was written up for giving a child «porn»!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! At the same time in our culture, in movies, on TV and internet, these kids could see much more graphic stuff.

We talked a bit about how I became a writer, discouragement, finding your voice, blogging, the difference between blogging and book writing, why I decided to write Jesus Feminist, my process as a writer, and the best (and worst) parts of writing among other things.

All books about other religions, for example, are written by Christians as attacks on other religions.

As he wrote earlier in this chapter, any use of the test as «a substitute for searching conversation» about world view / setting and the other dimensions of narrative explored later in the book was in his view more likely to yield a mechanist reduction than a deepened symbolic understandinAs he wrote earlier in this chapter, any use of the test as «a substitute for searching conversation» about world view / setting and the other dimensions of narrative explored later in the book was in his view more likely to yield a mechanist reduction than a deepened symbolic understandinas «a substitute for searching conversation» about world view / setting and the other dimensions of narrative explored later in the book was in his view more likely to yield a mechanist reduction than a deepened symbolic understanding.

As of yet no Intelligent design creationist has given anything but «faith» or «words» written down in a book equivalent to many other «holy» books with different and competing gods all throughout history that also have no verifiable evidence.

Beside it is not clear if he wrote the book bases Islam & the Quran or basis the Muslims in Asia or Muslims in Europe or America since although Islam is one but the Branch of Islam, the Race, the Customs & Traditions play a tough role in shaping each nation of Islam to look & thinks different from each other... am sure you have the same thing in Christianity as wouldn't think Chinese Christian is exactly like European Christians or European Christians are all the same with out any differences whether Protestants or Catholics or between both branches??

We should conclude that as in other New Testament books any evidence which can be adduced to prove that they were written in Hebrew or Aramaic points just as clearly to their having been composed by someone who was imperfectly bilingual.

This reviewer should point out that Berger acknowledges that the book was written over a period of two years «in moments snatched from other busy activities as a social scientist.»

I remembered Brennan Manning — the man who has translated the love of God in a way that I could receive it more than probably any other writer — was addicted to alcohol and I re-read up one of his last books before he died: «All is Grace: A Ragamuffin Memoir» where he vulnerably writes about what this battle has cost him, even as he experienced the unending and unconditional love of God in the midst of it, how he experienced regret and pain and loss alongside of the love and tenderness of God in this dependency.

I never set out to write a trilogy on our increasingly endangered democracy, but as I kept stumbling on ever more evidence of the legacy of the imperialist pressures we put on many other countries as well as the nature and size of our military empire, one book led to another.

And I think it's a book written by men, translated many times over hundreds of years by other men, and as far removed from the word of any actual god as can be.

I am kind of going the other way... I am writing a book, and then I post reworked sections from the chapters as blog posts.

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

Western scholars pictured Muhammad writing the Qur» an perhaps under divine inspiration — as an author might write any other book.

Indeed, in one of the book's thirty - three selections («How to Write a Book») Davies says that to live religiously necessitates being «attentive,» «careful,» and able «to look at life through eyes that are as clear as one can make them»; the very opposite, in other words, of living «neglectfully.&rabook's thirty - three selections («How to Write a Book») Davies says that to live religiously necessitates being «attentive,» «careful,» and able «to look at life through eyes that are as clear as one can make them»; the very opposite, in other words, of living «neglectfully.&raBook») Davies says that to live religiously necessitates being «attentive,» «careful,» and able «to look at life through eyes that are as clear as one can make them»; the very opposite, in other words, of living «neglectfully.»

As for the other books, they were written by men and left to their protection (Surah V, 44).

The theist, on the other hand, has necessarily made several assertions as to the existence of God, and the particular book this God has written, etc..

I am always trying to improve my knowledge of writing books and blogs, as well as doing what I can on my blog to help others find what I write and interact with me.

i don't know about you but a book written even a couple hundred years ago is useless and beyond outdated unless it was on the cosmos, mathematics, or geometry... oh and fairy tales such as canterbury, grimm, aesop, amoungst others, they carry moral lessons for society... and the bible, do we see a pattern here?

Its almost as if over the years that the various books were written, they were copying off of other religions rather than describing the same God.

From your last post: «So in other words, God inspired both the accurate writing of Scripture, as well as the accurate selection of which books to include within Scripture....

Some change in my thinking on this as on other matters during the six years separating the two books can not be denied and perhaps is not to be apologized for; but critics have been mistaken if they have supposed that the authenticity and the unique quality of Jesus» humanity have ever become less precious to me than when I wrote the first book.

Scholars do not agree, for instance, as to whether the Book of Ephesians was written by Paul as traditionally supposed or by some other hand.

Since 1960 over two hundred books and countless reports have examined either single congregations or their species, and any new work such as mine gratefully follows the tracks that many sorts of explorers — consultants, management specialists, sociologists, psychologists, ethnographers, historians, and others — have already laid down.1 Prior to 1960 the investigation of the local church was more occasional, and except for a few books written to enliven parish programs2 and the pioneering sociology of H. Paul Douglass, 3 the analysis occurred primarily in Europe.4

One of the reasons Madeleine L'Engle's [book]... had that strong Christian element to it wasn't just because she was Christian, but because she was frustrated with things that needed to be said to her in the world and she wasn't finding a way to say it and she wanted to stay true to her faith... In a good way, I think there are a lot of elements of what she wrote that we have progressed as a society and we can move onto the other elements.

As I write my own book, Close Your Church for Good I am trying to read several other books that seem to have similar content and themes.

As I once mentioned before, most biblical scholars (secular and non-secular) agree that several of the books in the bible (new and old testament) are forgeries and several others are attributed to people who did not write them.

Strauss overstated his thesis, but he opened up such a problem for Christianity thereafter that Bishop Stephen Neill, a moderate scholar, wrote in 1964 that «this book marked, as few others have done, a turning point in the history of the Christian faith».4

Schubert Ogden has written an essay on «The Strange Witness of Unbelief» (included in his book The Reality of God, SCM Press, London, 1967), in which he demonstrates how often it is the very negators of meaning whose way of life, attitude toward others, and struggle for a «better world» exhibit a dim yet pervasive feeling of significance in the world and in their own existence, a sense of meaning that (as Ogden argues and as I believe) is a hidden working of divine Love in their hearts.

Jesus the Son of Marry (Peace and blessings be up on him) is known today to the Christian world as it is being described by John, Paul, Luke and others... whatever the way these human imagined him became the faith... record shows that the first book of NT was written at least 60 - 80 years after Jesus the son of Marry was taken away from this earth... and these writers used their vision as a weapon to get it to the brain of mankind... also there are debates among the Christian scholars that no one knows who is the writer of some of the gospels... someone else wrote it and used the names what we see today... i.e. no one knows when and who and how the Hebrew chapters were written... despite of lots of controversy on this, Christian scholars uses them to teach others...

As a recent study conducted by Pew Research Center makes clear — and this is supported by other studies including a significant study released last fall, «A Survey of American Political Culture,» by Dr. James Davidson Hunter, who wrote the book Culture Wars — White Evangelical Protestants are not, as the Washington Post famously called them in 1993, «less affluent, less educated, and more easily led than the average American.&raquAs a recent study conducted by Pew Research Center makes clear — and this is supported by other studies including a significant study released last fall, «A Survey of American Political Culture,» by Dr. James Davidson Hunter, who wrote the book Culture Wars — White Evangelical Protestants are not, as the Washington Post famously called them in 1993, «less affluent, less educated, and more easily led than the average American.&raquas the Washington Post famously called them in 1993, «less affluent, less educated, and more easily led than the average American.»

As Hamilton has written in his latest book, Reading Moby Dick and Other Essays (Peter Lang, 1989):

All the other books, non-cannonical as well, could be gathered together as «everything said before Jesus, by the Jewish writers, and everything post Jesus that was written about the early church, or early writings that were not specifically what Jesus said and did.

That is was also distinctly possible that gathered fragmented written sources as well as oral traditions regarding the laws of Moses and histories of the kings of Israel and Judah coming from prior to Babylonian captivity were then secured and placed into a combined written sources from which what we know as the Books of Moses as well as other books that would be comprised into what we refer to as the Old TestaBooks of Moses as well as other books that would be comprised into what we refer to as the Old Testabooks that would be comprised into what we refer to as the Old Testament.

Just throw it away, treat it as it is, a work of fiction, like ANY other book written about Zeus, Apollo, Thor, Odin, or any other «god».

See the book The Science of the Soul for written statements by prominent scientists such as Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Erwin Schrodinger, Charles Darwin and others.

As described in the book The Science of the Soul, many prominent scientists, such as Stephen Hawking, Erwin Schrodinger, Albert Einstein, William Provine, Charles Darwin, and others, have made written statements concluding that science can not explain free will as a natural phenomenoAs described in the book The Science of the Soul, many prominent scientists, such as Stephen Hawking, Erwin Schrodinger, Albert Einstein, William Provine, Charles Darwin, and others, have made written statements concluding that science can not explain free will as a natural phenomenoas Stephen Hawking, Erwin Schrodinger, Albert Einstein, William Provine, Charles Darwin, and others, have made written statements concluding that science can not explain free will as a natural phenomenoas a natural phenomenon.

If I were writing a book on Whitehead I should put forward and discuss how much this interpretation was a distortion of Whitehead; I don't believe there is any other view as definite as this that can be got out of him.