Because of these difficulties, disagreement over whether complying with the mandate would be formal or material might well be disagreement not so much over the mandate
as over the nature of intention itself.
Not exact matches
So now is
as good an occasion
as any to get into one of the tried and true investment axioms, a tool that do - it - yourselfers and advisor - assisted investors can practice
over and
over again until it becomes second
nature.
Over the past few years, businesses have added 14 million jobs
as regional economies have rebounded; their workers have gained access to health insurance, and a new flock of startups has brought economy - altering innovations, some of which have changed the
nature of work itself.
It's human
nature to sympathize with one faction
over another, but
as the boss, you need to be ruthless in monitoring your own preferences and biases and make completely sure you come across
as neutral.
As the number of tech startups valued
over $ 1 billion begins to level out, we evaluate the changing
nature of private valuations.
Even though the SEO business is considered one that is service oriented in
nature, it is usually tricky to get copyright or IPP protection on some of the materials used especially
as a client might have more rights
over the material than the SEO company themselves.
At this point, it's human
nature to say —
as I've often heard from clients
over the last 39 years, whenever short rates rise above long rates — why buy a 20 - year bond when I get a higher yield on a 2 - year piece of paper?
Because, a) long - short mutual funds are expensive, b) the
nature of shorting a stock means getting limited upside but infinite downside, and c) active manager performance can wane
over time
as assets under management increase.
AGB: «I had built up some savings from work, and I wanted more control and flexibility
over my time, priorities, and the
nature of my work
as a whole.
In proposing the «Idea»
as the wellspring of both
nature and history, working itself out by converting the inconclusiveness of time into the universality of Spirit, the Hegelian project invited the final triumph of sheer eventuality
over rational order.
Even
as someone who gets frustrated with the
over PC
nature of MLK day it is totally out of line to put this article out on his day.
It was some such vision of our country that Lincoln — a true «outsider» — evoked with his «mystic chords of memory,» which, «stretching... all
over this broad land, will swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched
as surely they will be, by the better angels of our
nature.»
The
nature of the insults have changed, but insults have been around forever and bad
as they are, they sure beat people killing each other
over political and religious differences, practices frequent in the past and common around the globe today.
Unfortunately, humans seem to forget this fact when we find ourselves turning to
nature to guide us through difficult choices, such
as arguments about whether life begins at conception, or
over the proper structure of the family.
Communist (extreme left wing) and fascist (extreme right wing) governments are totalitarian in
nature and,
as such, they opposed organized religion the same way that they opposed unions; because they held rival power
over people.
As we grow into the world as infants, the exigencies of our physical nature lead us further and further away from the purity of soul suggested by baptism, while habitual responses gain the upper hand over our wish to follow the prompting of our higher natur
As we grow into the world
as infants, the exigencies of our physical nature lead us further and further away from the purity of soul suggested by baptism, while habitual responses gain the upper hand over our wish to follow the prompting of our higher natur
as infants, the exigencies of our physical
nature lead us further and further away from the purity of soul suggested by baptism, while habitual responses gain the upper hand
over our wish to follow the prompting of our higher
nature.
Describing its author's life up until his conversion to Christianity, the Confessions grounds Augustine's individual, mutable life in the unchanging
nature of God: «I entered into the depths of my soul,... and with the eye of my soul, such
as it was, I saw the Light that never changes casting its rays
over the same eye of my soul,
over my mind.»
So let me get this straight, it's far fetched for us to NOT have been created by a God and that's illogical but you believe there's a heaven and hell, a mystical deity who watches
over us yet fails to intervene in bloodshed that occurs daily in his name, this deity is all powerful but for some reason can't do anything more than a coin toss could and for some reason everything he can do is limited to exactly the same domain
as nature (EX: God can never regenerate a missing limb)?
This view entails a complete dismantling of traditional Christian doctrine, including: creation out of nothing, the finite duration of history and
nature, miracles
as direct divine acts, and the final triumph of good
over evil.
God does not work that way although God has full power
over nature as with the flood.
today,
as more people in European countries drift from Christianity, they are revealing more and more intrinsic problems in their societies that mainly come from the selfish
nature of the individual
over the whole.
As for me being attracted to other men... well I think we went
over that I'm not gay, but if you want to go to the whole «It's not natural thing» well considering that there has been ho.mose.xuality in other species, it actually does occur in
nature, what doesn't however is monogamous relationships.
Underlying this erroneous tendency,
as Faith has pointed out many times
over the last forty years, is the implicit or explicit denial of the transcendence of God, the Divinity of Christ, the historical objectivity of revelation and the authority of the Church in matters of faith and morals, and also the denial of the spiritual soul
as a principle of existence that is distinct from yet integrates the material within the unity of our human
nature.
I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain
as certain of that
as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for
over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph),
as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the
nature of the smack.»
Aristotle states explicitly that of the many senses of the word, «
nature,» the first and most proper is that by which «nature» means that principle that allows an entity, over and above its adventitious processes, itself to grow) 12 «Nature» is entity in the sense of form, with the additional condition that it is now regarded as «in some sense the factor which initiates movement and rest «13 of just those processes that take place within the concrete being itself that «has» the n
nature,» the first and most proper is that by which «
nature» means that principle that allows an entity, over and above its adventitious processes, itself to grow) 12 «Nature» is entity in the sense of form, with the additional condition that it is now regarded as «in some sense the factor which initiates movement and rest «13 of just those processes that take place within the concrete being itself that «has» the n
nature» means that principle that allows an entity,
over and above its adventitious processes, itself to grow) 12 «
Nature» is entity in the sense of form, with the additional condition that it is now regarded as «in some sense the factor which initiates movement and rest «13 of just those processes that take place within the concrete being itself that «has» the n
Nature» is entity in the sense of form, with the additional condition that it is now regarded
as «in some sense the factor which initiates movement and rest «13 of just those processes that take place within the concrete being itself that «has» the
naturenature.
Nor were animals and the forces of
nature to be bowed down to by man
as in pagan religion; rather man,
as a rational being made in the image of God, was to exercise dominion
over them.
Lewis spoke frequently and with great fondness about the simple pleasures of his academic life — friends, books,
nature — so it's easy to gloss
over these thing
as just that: simple pleasures.
Accordingly the «other world,» the Kingdom of God, is not conceived
as a universal metaphysical entity,
as a finer, higher, more spiritual
nature over against the earthly
nature.
As debate continues
over President Obama's assertion about the religious
nature (or lack thereof) of the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group, a new Pew Research Center study finds that more Americans across the board believe that Islam encourages violence more than other religions.
When we enter the tomb of suffering, we have about
as much control
over the logistics
as when we hit the car brakes on black - ice — and if there's anything human
nature craves, it's control.
With the philosophy of Rene Descartes (1596 - 1650), the
nature of reality was no longer seen
as writ large
over the universe only to be discovered by the exercise of reason but rather was what the human mind perceived, interpreted, made it to be («Cogito, ergo sum.
«Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, when he was about to offer himself once on the altar of the Cross to God the Father, making intercession by means of his death, so that he might gain there an eternal redemption, since his priesthood was not to be extinguished by death, at the last Supper, «on the night that he was handed
over», left to his beloved Spouse the Church a visible sacrifice, such
as the
nature of man requires, by which the bloody sacrifice achieved once upon the Cross might be represented and its memory endure until the end of the age, and its saving power be applied to the remission of those sins which are daily committed by us.»
This determination to live with
nature so far
as possible rather than rule
over it is not just an aesthetic preference, a taste for wilderness instead of gardens.
Why do we struggle so much because its our old
nature that fights against our new
nature in Christ which ever one we give into is the one that rules us.But
as a born again believer sin shall not have dominion
over us.The battle has been won by Christ so by believing in him we also walk
as he does
as a victor not a victim.Its his holy spirit that empowers us to do what is impossible in the flesh.But to do that our old
nature or heart must be crucified with Christ.brentnz
On the face of it Santayana rejects all three of these departures from the tradition, since (1) he makes no very explicit move from a continuant to an event ontology, (2) regards the inherent
nature of an object
as a matter of the individual eternal essence which it actualizes and (3) regards the distinction between matter and form
as at least a virtually inevitable way of expressing the obscure manner in which one state of things takes
over from another (see RB 278 - 284).
Geraldine here we see satans tactics to gain control
over our lives and he uses pride
as a means to control us if our hearts arent submitted to God we get lured into sin or our need for success or to please others or impress others of our worth.Being born again means to have our new identity in Christ we turn away from our old
nature and take on his
nature or identity.In the process we are redeemed through the blood of Jesus and our lives are transformed so we become
as he is.
He regards the world
as given
over to the power of judgment until the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ brings mercy and redemption, and he regards man
as by
nature vile and
as incapable of receiving pardon from God until the advent of Christ.
This could happen only if the guilty person were by
nature endowed with extraordinary stupidity, and presumably by shouting in antistrophic and antiphonal song every time someone persuaded him that now was the beginning of a new era and a new epoch, had howled his head so empty of its original quantum satis of common sense
as to have attained a state of ineffable bliss in what might be called the howling madness of the higher lunacy, recognizable by such symptoms
as convulsive shouting; a constant reiteration of the words «era,» «epoch,» «era and epoch,» «epoch and era,» «the System»; an irrational exaltation of the spirits
as if each day were not merely a quadrennial leap - year day, but one of those extraordinary days that come only once in a thousand years; the concept all the while like an acrobatic clown in the current circus season, every moment performing these everlasting dog - tricks of flopping
over and
over, until it flops
over the man himself.
But today's libertarians respond that biotechnology is not so much about changing
nature as increasing free beings» control
over it.
But this opinionativeness of truth is, to be sure, held in scant honor,
as also it is far from being the case that men in general regard relationship to the truth, the fact of standing in relationship to the truth,
as the highest good, and it is very far from being the case that they, Socratically, regard being under a delusion
as the greatest misfortune; their sensuous
nature is generally predominant
over their intellectuality.
«44 Yet
over against human activity, the role of
nature stands out
as the focus of the agricultural parables of Jesus.
No doubt the church has been right in acknowledging the deity of Christ and the Incarnation
as the fullest measure of the divine revelation of which human
nature is capable; though it should be pointed out that the church
as a rule undertook to stand fast and to hold the ground of the traditional, historical faith, enshrined in the New Testament, and —
as the histories of dogma make clear - only took
over metaphysical definitions which had already been hammered out on the anvils of logical and exegetical disputation.
The work of Evangelicals and Catholics Together has continued unabated
over the last twenty years, issuing documents pertaining to theological questions (such
as the
nature of justification)
as well
as those affecting the proper ordering of society (such
as the rights of the unborn).
Tommy God has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him
as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory
over.So where do you go from here
as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our
nature only Christ can do that our old
nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a real mess of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So
as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you
as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new man and sin will not have dominion
over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to have been set free by the power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz
C. S. Lewis once said that man's celebrated power
over nature «turns out to be a power exercised by some men over other men with Nature as its instrument.&
nature «turns out to be a power exercised by some men
over other men with
Nature as its instrument.&
Nature as its instrument.»
15.13), a God with «future
as his essential
nature» (
as E. Bloch puts it),
as made known in Exodus and in Israelite prophecy, the God whom we therefore can not really have in us or
over us but always only before us, who encounters us in his promises for the future, and whom we therefore can not «have» either, but can only await in active hope.»
By
nature, the present President of America has that element in him — I should not be saying this but I am being inherently made to convey this
as comment of exception for America and for Obama whose whole (Obama and his better half) stand
as an extension through the ex Presidential candidate's Charisma Of the Secretary Hillary Clinton that President Obama's Charisma has selflessly absorbed for function in the cabinet gracefully for America and the world.That shows the humbleness of President Obama and maturity of Hillary Clinton of acceptance without a feeling of high and low of ego regarded
as exceptional in Divinity.I was not supposed to make this comment and I have done so to urge the Republicans to accept their Light within of consensus through individual projections under control
as Obama's gesture of bipartisanship that will come to address.In short, this comment is all about health and health care where economics alone does not come into the picture with a rigorous analysis on it but should also extend
as leverage to the person in play (Obama) who is also selflessly poised with corrections on it
over the infra structure of it that he has proposed for approval
as ego of his working element
as the executive public ally chosen
as the President that had appealed to the public at large voting even putting behind able dleaers like McCain?George W Bush was the last to steer America into the Light
over the past of America and that stands
as the subtle truth even today
as on date with Bill Clinton the ex President of America giving support through his excellent independent caliber for Obama ultimately to head the show of America that was time bound of its reality that sees no barriers and to which he accepted well in his individual capacity
as the free lance ex President of America.
The unified understanding of the
nature of things
as they are in their being, to which we must conform, has been replaced by a dynamic interpretation of things in their creative becoming, with which we should cooperate, to which we can contribute, and
over which many of us attempt to exercise greater control.
They think of emancipation from its subject - object dualisms and the hegemonies these spawn (humans
over nature, men
over women, and the West
over the rest of the world)
as liberation indeed.
Referring to C. S. Lewis's much - cited claim in The Abolition of Man, Kass writes that if «man's so - called power
over nature is, in truth, always a power exercised by some
over others with knowledge of
nature as their instrument, can it really be liberating to exchange the rule of
nature for the role of arbitrary human will?»