Sentences with phrase «as particles in»

Moonbats: «Jacobson found that domes of increased carbon dioxide concentrations — discovered to form above cities more than a decade ago — cause local temperature increases that in turn increase the amounts of local air pollutants, raising concentrations of health - damaging ground - level ozone as well as particles in urban air.»

Thus, as particles in a system move around and interact, they will, through sheer chance, tend to adopt configurations in which the energy is spread out.

Over long periods of time, footballers playing a match change direction by the same amount as particles in churning fluid

Not exact matches

«In reality, the vast majority of the source term will never escape from the ocean as air - borne particles,» Spriggs said.

Using the suction apparatuses he saw in a sawmill as inspiration, he built his own vacuum that incorporated a cone - like cyclone system that could separate dirt particles from clean air.

This item is smaller than most others in its product category, but it's just as effective when it comes to eliminating pollen, dust, and other pesky particles.

Queensland University of Technology professor Lidia Morawska argued in 2007 that many common computer printer models cough up minuscule particles that, in her words, can be as dangerous as cigarette smoke.

In short, each star's extremely powerful winds of particles are colliding and heating up to roughly 50 million degrees, creating two lopsided «fans» of material that ultimately shape the innards of the dumbbell - like nebula, as this NASA simulation suggests:

A direct - drive exploding - pusher implosion as the first step in development of a monoenergetic charged - particle backlighting platform at the National Ignition Facility

However, over the past decade, industry operators have invested in green cleaning products and equipment such as floor scrubbers that use less chemical products and machines that ionize water to help lift dirt particles.

We have strict conservation of energy, not a strict conservation of matter... as in «matter can neither be created nor destroyed (because it can in particle annihilation)».

One virus - particle doesn't change color, but as it procreates mutations in that process can make the resulting child - virus differ from the parent - virus, so that the child - virus is capable of infecting a human as well as the original host thereby opening the possibility for a new human disease.

But in the context of the universe, time will never be up as long as there are any moving particles left, and even then its debatable.

There is at least one person alive today in my own field of theoretical particle physics who almost everyone recognizes as a genius.

And what about the entire ecological system of things, that works in harmony with us as humans for life to exist, from our atmosphere at 78 % nitrogen, 21 % oxygen down to the magnetosphere that comes from within the core of the earth and protects us from the sun's damaging electrically charged particles?

But for us, for now, his particles live on as minerals; mineral that might get in our water...

The simplicity criterion carries a heavy burden in Swinburne's argument, as it recommends theism's appeal to one being with simple (infinite) properties over materialism's appeal to many ultimate particles with complex properties.

If, for example, nature is seen as a great machine made up of lesser machines ultimately composed of particles of matter in law - abiding motion, then the cell also will be understood as being a law - abiding machine.

There is absolutely no evidence anywhere in the known univers, from the tiniest subatomic particle to the structure of the universe as a whole, that even remotely implies the faintest possibility thata deity exists.

At most simple levels of material synthesis, individual nodes of organization like subatomic particles are only determinate as functions within a bigger framework, so it is perhaps not surprising that their behaviour can only be expressed in terms of statistical probability.

You will find that the fields around these point particles are infinite, leading to inconsistencies such as infinite mass and infinite charge and so on (especially in quantum mechanics).

In addition, because part of the inertia of a particle is due to the electromagnetic field around it, as you speed up such a particle the electric field produces a magnetic field, the changing magnetic field produces a back EMF, and this whole reaction of the field produces a resistance to acceleration.

Brumbaugh agrees with Whitehead that it is a mistake to treat students as stupid particles in an insulating vacuum.

He spells out the neuroscientific view of our brains as a dynamic network of 100 billion neurons capable of 100 trillion different connections — a number larger than that of the elementary particles in the universe.

For the use of opening formulas and connecting particles by the Gospel writers in the Greek New Testament, there is no consistent renderings in any of the English as well as in most of the Indian versions.60 Therefore, the Indian versions, which are translated from English, lag behind to reflect the artistic mind of the author as well as the literary character of the narratives in the original source.

Starting out with the fact that particle means dust anyone who is interested in proving the truth to themselves can do some research as to exactly what the BBT is all about and then compare it to the word that God gave us on the matter.

Now then, what if it is made of particles with no extension at all, such as points whose tracks in space - time can be represented by lines?

If you assume that the mass was all electromagnetic or that it all behaved in the same way as electromagnetic (which was perhaps suggested by cathode ray experiments which showed that the ratio of e by m actually went as 1 divided by the square root of 1 - v2 / c2, then it follows that particles get heavier in this ratio.

Here goes another try... The Universe is a chaotic mixture of matter (sub-atomic particles) and energy (motion and, light) in space time, where matter, through evolution, recombines to raise up consciousness, such as yourself.

Not even in the examples you cited: «quantum phenomena... Radioactive decay, formation of particle pairs in a vacuum, etc.» can be described as «having the quality of being within themselves.»

We also know that the universe is primarily made of light when you look at what EM radiation and any particle is made of, just as is said in the Bible.

It is written on the canvas of the endless universe, as well as in the tiniest particle of the matter human eye have ever seen.

In this concept of existences as teleological processes, Whitehead thought, we find the proper way for the philosopher to perform his task, now that the basic idea of physics has become the flux of energy rather than the particle of Newtonian matter.

The particle and wave models themselves can not he regarded as simply descriptive of reality, but when taken together in this complicated way they can be regarded as giving us knowledge of the real world.5

The new consciousness is analogous to the new physics which denies there are any such entities as particles uninfluenced in their inner nature by other entities.

In consequence, with such models as their objective, physicists frequently formulate the content of quantum mechanics in the language of classically conceived particles and waves, because of certain analogies between the formal structures of classical and quantum mechanics... Accordingly, although a satisfactory uniformly complete interpretation of quantum mechanics based on a single model can not be given, the theory can be satisfactorily interpreted for each concrete experimental situation to which the theory is appliedIn consequence, with such models as their objective, physicists frequently formulate the content of quantum mechanics in the language of classically conceived particles and waves, because of certain analogies between the formal structures of classical and quantum mechanics... Accordingly, although a satisfactory uniformly complete interpretation of quantum mechanics based on a single model can not be given, the theory can be satisfactorily interpreted for each concrete experimental situation to which the theory is appliedin the language of classically conceived particles and waves, because of certain analogies between the formal structures of classical and quantum mechanics... Accordingly, although a satisfactory uniformly complete interpretation of quantum mechanics based on a single model can not be given, the theory can be satisfactorily interpreted for each concrete experimental situation to which the theory is applied.2

The extreme cases of unambiguous wave and particle behaviour occur in mutually exclusive laboratory situations.7 As one physicist puts it, you may have to use a wave model on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, and a particle model on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays.

This view comes very near to my own conception; however, it differs, because Schlick also writes (p. 293): «Consciousness can not be the essence of the brain particles for they are present even when consciousness is absent, as in death or sleep.»

Developments in quantum mechanics (with its emphasis on probabilities, wave - particle duality, quantum teleportation of information and tunnelling, and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle) may prove a useful, if limited, tool in speculating about topics such as free will, communication, matter - spirit and epistemology.

A negative particle mē accompanying the optative indicates that the speaker strongly deprecates what is before him — it can be rendered as a curse, as in Acts 8:20, an imprecation of evil.

In the early twentieth century, the particles were understood as atoms.

To talk about the leap from subatomic particles and probabilities to objects as we know them, and to talk about the leap from chemistry to consciousness, is in a very real sense to engage in metaphysics.

Moreover, while classical Greek uses the particles eithe or ei gar with the optative to construct a clause of wishing, later Greek (as in the case of Luke 1:38), omits these particles.

First: the basic building - blocks of the universe can not be neatly classified as either waves or particles in the traditional sense.

The mechanistic view conceived of reality as consisting in the least common denominator — a non-living, non-valuing and non-mental particle.

I personlly do believe in creation, as well as the big bang, and I don't see how discovering the higgs boson particle will disprove religion at all.

Penrose continues, «Even if we were to write a zero on each separate proton and on each separate neutron in the entire universe - and we could throw in all the other particles as well for good measure - we should fall far short of writing down the figure needed.

Some scientists believe that an electrical apocalypse could really occur, in the event of an electromagnetic pulse attack, described in one 2008 white paper as «a high - intensity burst of electromagnetic energy caused by the rapid acceleration of charged particles.»

We are in this matter trying to conceive what is most unlike ourselves but superior, as in dealing with atoms and particles, we are trying to conceive what is most unlike ourselves but inferior.

«Since the existence of the Higgs boson particle was first predicted almost half a century ago, thousands of physicists have spent many millions of pounds in an attempt to pin it down, as yet to no avail.