Sentences with phrase «as permanent loss of capital»

We define risk as a permanent loss of capital, controlled at the portfolio and stock level via allocation limits, our focus on private market value (PMV) and our in - depth understanding of the companies we choose.

We think of risk as permanent loss of capital, not short term price fluctuation which merely represents volatility.

Answer: We think of risk as permanent loss of capital, not short term price fluctuation which merely represents volatility.

«Following a strategy that involved no real risk — defined as permanent loss of capital — Walter produced results over his 47 partnership years that dramatically surpassed those of the S&P 500,» wrote Buffett, whose stewardship of Berkshire

We define risk as the permanent loss of capital.

I define risk as the permanent loss of capital.

Not exact matches

As an active investor, I am seeking the highest after - tax return on my capital with low risk to permanent loss of capital.

«My job, as manager and fellow owner, is to allocate the vehicle's capital to produce the highest absolute return on invested capital while minimizing the risk of permanent loss of capital» Michael Burry

It has the propensity to significantly underestimate the probability of extreme volatility, known as tail events, that can lead to the permanent loss of capital.

This should matter for all investors as in a world of low returns, ensuring the avoidance of permanent loss of capital is paramount.

Rather simple, when you ponder it a while» Frank Martin «I think volatility is so widely used as a risk - metric simply because it is easy to measure, not because it is a good gauge of risk of permanent loss of capital.

You have to balance the benefits of a buy - and - hold approach — such as lower taxes and transaction costs, the historical upward bias of the market and the peace of mind that comes from removing yourself psychologically from active investing — against the possibility of a major drawdown or a permanent loss of capital.

Instead, consider the small $ $ loss of a teenager as a permanent loss of «seed capital» - seed capital that would have grown over time to become much larger.

While we don't think using volatility as a proxy for risk is appropriate (we view risk as the potential for permanent loss of capital), investors should be well - aware of the nature of the investments to which they will likely be exposed.

We learned even though some of our highest returns were from opportunistic investments, our performance was below average when we considered our losses and permanent capital losses such as with retailer Body Central.

Lu on the other hand views risk as the possibility that you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.

That said, I think the holistic approach of sticking to high - quality companies that have lengthy track records of paying and growing dividends is fairly low in risk as far as permanent capital loss.

Obviously at Rebalance IRA you're cognizant of those realities too and so it sounds to me as if a goal is also to avoid the permanent impairment of capital, which is to avoid losses.

I personally define risk as the loss of permanent capital over a medium term, say five years.

But I think the key points to make to the investors is that risk should not be defined as short - term volatility but permanent loss of capital, which can happen in the bond markets, as investors in Greek bonds found out.

As so often proclaimed here on the blog, risk is the probability of a permanent loss of capital.