Searches of electronic media, permitted by law and carried out at borders and ports of entry, are vital to detecting information that poses serious harm to the United States, including terrorist plans, or constitutes criminal activity — such
as possession of child pornography and trademark or copyright infringement.
Not exact matches
A North Dakota psychologist who served
as an expert witness in hundreds
of sex - crime cases in multiple states has admitted an addiction to
child pornography and now faces federal charges for
possession of child porn.
Our firm represents clients charged with serious Felonies, including Sex Crimes, Rape, Sexual Assault and Sexual Battery; Failure to Register
as a Sex Offender,
Child Abuse,
Possession of Child Pornography,
as well
as Capital Murder and Manslaughter.
Whether a person is «in
possession»
of a thing is an important legal issue in many different kinds
of criminal law cases, including criminal drug
possession cases, criminal gun
possession cases, certain sex crime cases such
as child pornography and computer crime - related cases,
possession of stolen property or receiving stolen property cases.
As mentioned,
possession of child pornography is illegal.
Selling, production, or distribution
of child pornography can also face the same penalties
as possession.
Federal crimes such
as bank robbery, kidnapping, health care fraud, mortgage fraud, insurance and securities fraud, and
child pornography possession are often the result
of long - term investigations that involve multiple interviews and searches.
For example,
as criminal lawyers in San Jose we have represented clients in Santa Clara County who have faced life in prison for three - strike cases; two - strike cases; serious or violent felonies, i.e., attempted murder, car - jacking, robbery, first degree burglary, gang - related stabbings;
child pornography sex offenses requiring mandatory lifetime sex offender registration;
child molestation, felony
possession of methamphetamine for sale; felony
possession of marijuana for sale, weapons offenses and many more.
As well, he represented John Robin Sharpe, who was charged with
possession of child pornography.
Section 163.1
of the Criminal Code prohibits the production, distribution, sale and
possession of child pornography, which is defined
as follows:
One proposed solution to the perceived problem would be to make simple
possession of offending material ie downloading, illegal —
as in
child pornography offences.
Florida cyber crimes defense attorney David S. Seltzer wrote
of this that «I do not believe that our
child pornography laws were designed for these situations... A conviction for
possession of child pornography in Florida draws up to five years in prison for each picture or video, plus a lifelong requirement to register
as a sex offender.»