Sentences with phrase «as proof of anything»

Though wholly unreliable as proof of anything (I am, after all, a non-scientist), the results of this brief review confirmed my suspicions:

I look forward to your future condemnation of attmepts to use regional weather as proof of anything global.

Anyone resorting to waving this graph about as proof of anything at all is simply claiming «proof by repeated assertion.»

Indeed, you will see plenty of statements pointing out the fallacy of taking one event or season as proof of anything.

It is rare that one paper can be pointed to as proof of anything — most papers are bricks in the wall, albeit some bricks are more important than others.

Once, not all that long ago, artists could establish their dissidence through the innovative originality of their work, but the avant - garde strategy of rupture, the creation of an iconoclastic artwork, has become so thoroughly assimilated as to no longer serve as proof of anything more than that the artist is a good student.

to John Aga, I don't take the DOJ's action against the book publishers as proof of anything meaningful.

Not exact matches

It's just further proof that many investors don't mind losing a steady trickle of money paying for hedges, so long as they're protected to the downside, should anything shock the market.

As for the one god being more valid than any of the other thousands, that things you attribute to him (technically to Jesus), still haven't been proven in anything outside of the bible, which no one of a scientific mind can accept as convincing prooAs for the one god being more valid than any of the other thousands, that things you attribute to him (technically to Jesus), still haven't been proven in anything outside of the bible, which no one of a scientific mind can accept as convincing prooas convincing proof.

You have yet to prove anything I stated as incorrect and even added proof by admiting to fitting into the definitions of a religion

The story of a resuurection is not proof of anything, as the story you've been told since birth was NOT recorded by anyone who was there, rather it was FINALLY written down 2 generations after the so - called «fact».

Personally, I feel that if there is a god, and he wants me to believe he exists, he can come over here and tell me himself, I don't accept the Bible as «proof» of anything, because it is self - contradictory and appears to be heavily influenced by the governing culture of the time.

You have a strong bias toward wanting anything you observe as a part of your testing to be proof of what you believe.

As if it was proof of anything other than an individuals belief.

I just had to come back to this blog due to the mentioning of infllation as a «proof» of anything.

In the light of Bible teaching that nobody can be called a murderer or a killer without proof and how God prescribes a fine if a man causes a miscarriage as opposed to anything more severe it is clear that if a woman has an abortion it is not murder for if there is a soul there God moves it elsewhere.

Now, it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind - bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some have chosen to see it as the final proof of the NON-existence of God.

@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

However, I can plainly admit — if someone asked me for actual proof of God — I can not show them anything as proof.

The bible is not proof of anything, I've read Greek Myths as well it does not mean Zeus exsists.

As far as Jesus» followers facing death and punishment for being outspoken — 100 % certainty is no proof of anythinAs far as Jesus» followers facing death and punishment for being outspoken — 100 % certainty is no proof of anythinas Jesus» followers facing death and punishment for being outspoken — 100 % certainty is no proof of anything.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

how about the proof of the life of Jesus — this has monumental historical proof — even liberal atheists state that the fact of Jesus» life is as sure as anything historical ever can be

Given I and millions have personally experienced these transforming truths as written in the Bible and given there is no proof that anything in the Bible is not as presented there is no logical reason to doubt the Bible is not the word of God translated so that we can begin the journey.

If God exist in the real world, then yes I will need at least enough proof of it as anything else that exist in the real world, If, however, God does not exist in the real world then no proof is possible or necessary.

The popularity of Allen Ginsberg is often cited as proof that anything goes if you're a poet these days, but there are still many who despise him and his kind.

When I ask you what type of proof you require, your answer is to define what you will NOT accept as proof (anything having to do with human invention, testimony, etc.), but when it comes to what you WILL accept as proof your response is «God should know exactly what would work for me.»

When you offer their writings, as proof of what they were writing about... just doesn't prove anything.

There is no expectation to succeed and anything good which does come from it is held as proof of Wenger's genius.

If anything, look for Mr. Barron to use the paper's endorsement of Mr. Jeffries as further proof that he is the insurgent running against the establishment.

I am not aware of any planetary scientist who believes that these features are anything more than natural formations.One problem with using the Viking images as proof of something is that they are low resolution.

I've essentially made myself bonk - proof, and with fat as my primary source of fuel, I don't need to eat anything at two hours anymore.

Phoenix provided further proof, if any were needed, that he can be one of the most magnetic performers around in last year's «The Master,» and he's absolutely terrific too in the as - yet - undated «The Immigrant,» so we can't wait to see him tackle this role, which appears to be in a more touching, albeit probably more off - kilter, register than anything we've seen him in recently.

More than anything else, the students and staff needed self - belief and proof of their abilities and worth as a group.

As far as wiring or having the bank send a check themselves, they are highly unhelpful as they want a written request + ID + change - of - address proof mailed or faxed to them before they will do anythinAs far as wiring or having the bank send a check themselves, they are highly unhelpful as they want a written request + ID + change - of - address proof mailed or faxed to them before they will do anythinas wiring or having the bank send a check themselves, they are highly unhelpful as they want a written request + ID + change - of - address proof mailed or faxed to them before they will do anythinas they want a written request + ID + change - of - address proof mailed or faxed to them before they will do anything.

The purpose of puppy proofing is to make sure you remove anything that could be harmful to your new pet such as cleaning products, electric cords or breakable glass.

It's all quite humorous as each CPU has their respective regions within Gamindustri, like Planeptune, Lastation, Leanbox and Lowee» «apparently, anything out of Lastation is «future - proofed.»

Martin, whose work is currently on view at the Whitney's figural - painting show «Flatlands,» has become a buzzy emerging artist for these perplexing images, and now, at Bodega, he'll show more of them in a show titled «Eczema Song,» which, if its loopy press release is any proof, will be as weird and hypnotic as anything else he's done.

[Response: There are websites devoted to showing the moon landings were faked as well, but that is hardly proof of anything.

This is not to prejudge whether the data will prove one side right or wrong but no one can claim to have proved anything so long as any part of what they assert as proof is opaque.

Greg (we almost feel a little bit bad for having a go at someone who describes himself as «A high school science teacher in the process of burning out «[EDIT: especially now that Greg — not Gary — pointed out to us, much more politely than would have been perfectly reasonable, and to our embarrassment, and for which we apologise, that we got his name wrong first try]-RRB- presents «inescapable proof» that it is definitely better to «do something» (anything?)

You know, BBD, you're straining your hive - conditioned, party - line flunky, pea - brain just a bit too hard with your little, over-wrought, unconvincing, reductio ad absurdum «proof» that «consensus» climate scientists are not, in the main, sell - out, toady, enablers of the CAGW scam — toiling away (as much as a bunch of parasite, suck - up, goof - off, sloth - freak dorks with a spoiled brat sense of entitlement can ever be said to «toil away» at anything) on behalf of your trough - provider, make - a - buck / make - a-gulag, ripoff - the - taxpayer betters.

As I recall I said (citing the source) 8 cm for forty years (which I don't recall characterizing as «dramatic» or much of anything at all other than proof of Rocks» errorAs I recall I said (citing the source) 8 cm for forty years (which I don't recall characterizing as «dramatic» or much of anything at all other than proof of Rocks» erroras «dramatic» or much of anything at all other than proof of Rocks» error).

Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.

The difficultiy is, of course, that since no general public was ever onsulted about bringing these organisations into existence, and since no general public ever gets any say in any of the appalling policies they emit, it's hard to see how we can get any purchase on the problem — the entire degenerate system has been set up so as to be proof against anything external which might influence it.

My understanding of this is that Steve is correct in using PCA as an exploratory method, while strongly cautioning against viewing the results as definite proof of anything — even if the residuals would happen to be impressive!

Journalists won't tell you about the deadly effect of either until 10 p.m. Government minions will latch gratefully on to anything «significant» as proof their budget (and therefore power) should be increased.

But when you pick up threads and only show them as proving no AGW and have not done anything like as much checking of those facts as you demand from the pro AGW proofs, you aren't being skeptical, you're denying AGW.

As people keep saying, the Earth have seen bigger CO2 concentrations, therefore this temporal perfturbation, no matter now bad it is for us, is no proof of anything.