Sentences with phrase «as random people»

You don't need to worry about having friends to play with, as random people are just as much fun.

It's also distracting to see notifications constantly popping up as random people try to join your game, even though it's already full.

This isn't a drop - in and play co-op game where the second player joins as a random person never mentioned or as an exact clone of the single player.

There is no main playable character per se and you start off as a random person waking up in a bunker.

Not exact matches

Some of the people you'll hear spreading anti-Semitic views are blatant apologists for extremism, justifying a car barreling into an Israeli bus stop or a random knife attack on the street as a legitimate expression of frustration at the lack of a Palestinian state, Jewish victims be damned.

Companies such as MarketTools and other market research firms can develop random sample populations and help compile lists for specialized market segments, such as women between the ages of 25 and 40 who live in the San Francisco Bay area, or people who have children or pets.

Granted, as the son of a fireman who wouldn't let me light my own candles until I was college - aged, the idea of random people on the internet now having the ability to expel two - foot flames on a whim is enough to make me subconsciously recite my family's emergency escape plan.

It was 20 - 30 % faster than more optimized boarding methods such as random boarding, when people get on without regard to where their assigned seats are.

«I think when the American people hear from my client, who will provide details, very specific details relating to this threat, they will conclude, as I have, that this was not a random threat by some wing nut... this was a threat not by some wing nut out of the blue, and that's all I'm going to say.»

On April 26, 2012, the results of a study which tested their subjects» pro-social sentiments were published in the Social Psychological and Personality Science journal in which non-religious people had higher scores showing that they were more inclined to show generosity in random acts of kindness, such as lending their po.sse.ssions and offering a seat on a crowded bus or train.

I generally like to find out things for myself instead of believing random people on a comment board, so I'm curious as to your statements.

Conclusion: for us to explain how a loving God could cause us to suffer as a test, we have to assume that God's knowledge is limited, we have to explain the apparently random selection of people to be tested, and we have to postulate a complicated system of rewards in the life to come in order for the different degrees of severity of the test to be appropriately rewarded.

JW, «Billions of people believing in God and Jesus can not be just a random thing... If there were probably hundreds I would probably dought as well!»

As people begin to ask whether our beautiful but fragile world is part of a godless and random universe, on course for an inevitable extinction event, how can we show that it is in fact held in the hands of a sovereign and loving God?

Smalling and Schuklenk exhibit contempt for religious people, whom they regard as dimwitted literalists nursing «arbitrary and random» moral beliefs.

To say, as Joe says, that «God making evolution appear undirected is similar to the idea that he planted dinosaur fossils and created geological strata to fool us into thinking the earth has been around more than 6,000 years,» is in my view completely to misunderstand what scientists and ordinary people mean when they speak about random processes.

So, nature selects for people who perceive even random occurrences as something they have to protect themselves from.

Another theme in the new wave of street evangelism is to seek to love people through what could be described as random acts of kindness.

This is almost as bad as those shows where random people were asked about other world cultures («How many Eiffel Towers are there?»)

As a result, I am always amazed when people read my (sometimes) random meanderings and musings about life, Scripture, and theology.

On purely moral issues, judges are no more competent or trustworthy, as Justice Scalia observed in Cruzan, the Missouri «right to die» case, than «nine people picked at random from the Kansas City telephone directory.»

Some people feel as though there is more to the universe than a random scientific reaction, but do not agree with the idea of taking rules and ideas that were written down by MEN thousands of years ago as the word of GOD.

The Bible also say,» The fool saith in his heart that there is no God» If you are an intellegent person you would question so as to why everything is systamatic and not random.

This doesn't mean we must now go and have random meals with random people (although we might as well seize the opportunity and embrace adventure).

If the majority of society put half of the effort into developing their intellect and forming their own beliefs that many put into living a life controlled by what any random man who claims they are spreading God's message, perhaps people would actually come to their own conclusions rather than simply accepting the ones presented to them as the one and only truth.

Nevertheless, the first and even the subsequent early councils were not called at random but because there were people ---- like Arius, Sabellius, the Nestorians (though not Nestorius), and others ---- who were teaching things about Jesus, the Father, or the Holy Spirit that, so far as our evidence can tell us, were not being taught by the majority of the Church.

Some general points: I think we can all agree that there's a difference between any random group of, well, anyone versus a group of people openly acting as a hate posse such as klansmen in full klan regalia.

A person's chances of survival were dictated by something as random as their location in the building when the plane hit, not by whether they prayed.

not sure i said this before or not, i have been on cnn.com for over a year — anyway — i have been going to random churches, temples, really place that worships any form of the of abraham and others — i have yet to get anywhere but where i started from — which is what i am, what i am meant to be, and what i was... only this has been gained — gained is a gift of a word for i knew all of this before i started and so i view my time as wasted only for this the reason of getting somewhere — i did meet many great people with great views but all required the very real existence of god which was something lacking and why they had a constant failure yet what they called «keeping the faith» att itude type results... something was missing or missunderstood — your take?

To pick (somewhat at random) another example of how sound philosophy acts as a corrective to unsound theology, we could imagine someone holding the opinion that bilocation (as experienced by some saints) implies the simultaneous location of a person (body and soul) in two places at once.

This collection of short stories describes the random acts of kindness that Thompson has experienced at the hands of people she describes as «angels»...

And a person's religion, thrust upon them at random, also happens to be used by most to guide their actions in many ways based upon those false writings as they use their distorted perceptions of the world to channel and shape what comes forth from each person..

That would at least give people a better understanding of, as Hawking professes, it was all just random.

Experiences I had, subjects I studied, professional positions I held, people who had a profound impact on my thought — much of this, seemingly random at the time, came into focus as remote preparation for becoming the papal biographer I never intended to be.

On a random but nice food note, I've just discovered, as a thyroid person (those who have it get it) that one of the foods I should avoid is kale!

Yesterday as I stood in the kitchen trying to figure out what to make for dinner I wondered to myself, how do those people do it on those shows where they are given random ingredients and are suppose come up with something genius.

Better Than Takeout Orange Chicken - StumbleUpon Yesterday as I stood in the kitchen trying to figure out what to make for dinner I wondered to myself, how do those people do it on those shows where they are given random ingredients and are suppose come up with something genius.

I can hear it now — random internet person: you are as crazy as Arsene Wenger!

As an example lets say someone had 13 matches correct and someone had 10 but the person with 10 got all the random questions right.

Some random person making an innocuous comment on their blog, twitter, at a playgroup, whatever about their kids tv consumption or lack thereof is not meant as a dig at me or any other person.

I mean, not that she didn't get any attention, but a lot of the time she was quite content to do her own little baby thing (people watching, or chewing random things, or whatever) with no particular attention from me, as long as I was there.

As you know, I thought some random person answered your Craigslist add and you swapped milk for money one day.

This launched a whole bunch of play that involved the red rollers as people and the large random shape we had made on the desk as a castle.

While stranger rape can be understood by the victim as a random, one - off event, the betrayal of trust in date rape can have a much more devastating effect on a person.

More specifically, for easy and quick interaction with «strangers», society as a whole needs to have the understanding, that they are safe from arbitrary violence (put simpler: people must believe that they won't get killed by a random stranger when walking down the street).

Finally, as President Ben Ali fled and the country risked disorder and random violence, people across the country used social media to dispel misinformation and organize themselves to counter security forces, regime - supporters and looters alike.

If you don't want to be bombarding Congress with random emails (they get more than enough as it is), try posting a petition or some other alert that doesn't immediately send a message to a target — people will feel like they've done something, you'll get new names, and you won't be bothering that legislative staffer whose just a bit hacked off at being pestered by your messages.

If you have doubts, compare level of life of the poorest people in the an urban ghetto in USA vs. random poor worker or peasant in USSR who lived far from the center in late 1980s or 1960s (when people were not artificially subcidized by selling oil to the west as under Brezhnev).

RANDOM STAT: Alarmingly the Tories had a 10 - point lead in Labour - held marginal seats, though take this with a pinch of salt as the sample size was only 186 people.

Because there haven't been enough random people coming out of the woodwork to take on Kirsten Gillibrand, why not add the father of American Idol judge Kara DioGuardi into the mix as well?