Parent capacity orders aim to reduce the need for FACS to intervene, such
as removal of a child from the family home or a decision not to return a child to their parent's care.
Not exact matches
According to the letter, one list posted includes the names
of all Boston Archdiocese clergy who have been found guilty
of sexually abusing a
child by the Catholic Church or under criminal law,
as well
as any accused individuals who voluntarily requested
removal from the clergy.
«O
children of Adam, do not let the devil dupe you
as he did when he caused the eviction
of your parents from Paradise, and the
removal of their garments to expose their bodies.
[7:27] O
children of Adam, do not let the devil dupe you
as he did when he caused the eviction
of your parents from Paradise, and the
removal of their garments to expose their bodies.
An analogy to baptism would be the
removal (either literally or figuratively)
of a
child from the slums
of a great city, where the
child has been surrounded by influences that might cause him or her to grow up
as a young delinquent, into a healthy and wholesome atmosphere where in loving acceptance there will be provided a healthy and glad acceptance, with deep friendships, happy environment, and enriching circumstances.
The belief that every single person is precious in God's sight has inspired some Christians to work for social changes such
as the abolition
of slavery, an end to the exploitation
of factory workers, the
removal of racial discrimination and apartheid, and the prevention
of cruelty to and the sexual abuse
of women and
children.
For example, to condemn lethal organ harvesting, or pre-viability
removal of an unborn
child from its mother, it is not necessary to claim that the surgeon «must» have intended the foreseen death for the unborn
child or the organ donor —
as a result
of what he did intend for the object
of his assault.
Transplanting
children — whether this occurs
as the result
of remarriage,
removal, adoption, parental loss, or change in custody — constitutes the most difficult challenge in raising
children.
I look forward to the
removal of this offensive graphic
as quickly
as possible so that parents applying for passports for their
children do not receive messages from the Government
of Canada that promote artificial feeding.
As an example, if kitchen clean up and trash
removal occurs immediately after the last bite
of food is consumed at the table, and homework is done immediately after clean up, then your
child will develop routine habits that leave less room for argument.
When the AAP felt youth tackle football had «no place in programs for kids» in the 50's; now in 2015, this is a game so sacred to our society that while, modifying «would likely lead to a decrease in the incidence
of overall injuries, severe injuries, catastrophic injuries, and concussions» the AAP can not recommend limiting tackle for young
children as «the
removal of tackling from football would lead to a fundamental change in the way the game is played.»
However, while «positive» punishment involves the addition
of an undesirable consequence in response to an action — think detention after school — «negative» punishment involves the
removal of something the
child enjoys, such
as a cherished toy or a scheduled playdate.
As New York City Administration for
Children's Services requests for the removal of children rise, advocates say low - income parents of color with few resources are being punished, with the criminalization of parenting choices nicknamed Ja
Children's Services requests for the
removal of children rise, advocates say low - income parents of color with few resources are being punished, with the criminalization of parenting choices nicknamed Ja
children rise, advocates say low - income parents
of color with few resources are being punished, with the criminalization
of parenting choices nicknamed Jane Crow.
It is certainly not an illustration
of courage or leadership on the part
of the council members, legislators, mayor or county executive, who have joined in the chorus
of racist and incompetent Board
of Ed members seeking my
removal, so
as to push back on me to not disclose their culpability in rigging the recent teacher's contract, or their complicity in trying to unfairly settling the Board's $ 450 million lawsuit against Lou Ciminelli, for fleecing the citizens and
children of Buffalo.
«It is certainly not an illustration
of courage or leadership on the part
of the council members, legislators, mayor or county executive, who have joined in the chorus
of racist and incompetent Board
of Ed members seeking my
removal, so
as to push back on me to not disclose their culpability in rigging the recent teacher's contract, or their complicity in trying to unfairly settling the board's $ 450 million lawsuit against (developer) Lou Ciminelli for fleecing the citizens and
children of Buffalo.
Instead
of arriving at the position
of either backing the government's welfare bill or forever being depicted
as the friend
of the scrounger, shadow ministers should have been making a big argument about the regressive nature
of the Budget, the lamentable symbolism
of effectively scrapping
child poverty targets and the
removal of in - work benefits to those eponymous hard - working families.
An extraordinary Sally Hawkins is Elisa, an orphan discovered by the banks
of a river, her neck scarred from the
removal of her larynx
as a
child.
If reducing
children's exposure to school
removal as punishment is a national priority, then our study points to one potentially effective strategy: increasing the number
of teachers
of color in public schools.
As Barton (1998) said, «Inclusive education is about the participation
of all
children and young people and the
removal of all form
of exclusionary practices» (pp. 84 - 85).
Numerous provisions contained in S. 1177 represent a huge step forward from current legislation: the elimination
of adequate yearly progress and the 100 percent proficiency requirements, tempering the test - and - punish provisions
of No
Child Left Behind; the continued requirement
of disaggregated subgroup data;
removal of the unworkable school turnaround models required under the School Improvement Grant and Race to the Top programs; clarification
of the term school leader
as the principal
of an elementary, middle or high school; inclusion
of the use
of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention
of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use
of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effective.
Edie's eternally patient husband, Russell, sees the
removal of his last
child as something
of a relief, after all Ben is 22 years old and has only gone
as far
as Walthamstow, at the other end
of the tube line, to live with his girlfriend in her mother's house.
As Reswob and I discuss the coyote and his research into the attempted
removal of it from parts
of the midwestern United States, I begin to wonder why I, like countless other
children, took pleasure in watching the many creative deaths
of the immortal Wile E.
As my co-blogger Robert Ambrogi pointed out here, law bloggers did indeed miss a fairly big story when they, generally, failed to address the significant legal questions raised by Texas officials»
removal of 416
children from a polygamist sect's compound.
As Carolyn Elefant noted here yesterday, I was critical in an earlier post
of legal bloggers» silence over Texas's wholesale
removal of more than 400 FLDS
children.
A care order application will normally propose a permanent
removal,
as the Adoption Agency Regulations Guidance places an onus on social services to provide a permanent placement for any
child who has been in their care for a period
of more than four months, and until April last year local authorities received large cash incentives for reaching government targets based on the number
of children adopted out
of care.
That act, referred to in this article
as the «Implementing Act» states that, «A person whose rights
of custody with respect to a
child are breached due to
removal to or retention in Japan may file a petition against the person who takes care
of the
child with a Family Court to seek an order to return the
child to the state
of habitual residence pursuant to the provisions
of this Act.»
The court considers whether the proposed
removal is in the best interest
of the
child by considering certain factors, such
as the motives behind the proposed move.
Again, the court considers whether the proposed
removal is in the best interest
of the
child by considering certain factors, such
as the motives behind the proposed move.
B), and its implementing legislation, the International
Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. § § 11601 - 11610 (2000), were adopted to «protect
children from the harmful effects
of their wrongful
removal or retention and to establish procedures to ensure their prompt return to the State
of habitual residence,
as well ast o secure protection for rights
of access.»
The Preamble states that the Hague Convention seeks «to protect
children internationally from the harmful effects
of their wrongful
removal or retention and to establish procedures to ensure their prompt return to the State
of their habitual residence,
as well
as to secure protection for the rights
of access.»
«This legislation has nothing to do with the faster
removal of foreign criminals,» Mamann said, adding that typical
removal order cases involve permanent residents who were brought to Canada
as children, and are entitled to citizenship, but have never taken it out for a variety
of reasons.
If the parent proposing the move or
removal has sole legal or joint legal custody
of the
child and the
child resides with that parent for the greater period
of time or the parents have substantially equal periods
of physical placement with the
child,
as an alternative to the petition, motion or order to show cause under par.
(c) A change
of the residence or the
removal of a
child as described in subsection (a) may be considered a material change
of circumstances which justifies modification
of a prior order
of legal custody, residency,
child support or parenting time.
As a result, the retention
of a
child after the expiration
of a consent period constituted a wrongful
removal or retention in breach
of the Convention mechanism.
This applies especially to mothers whose babies are taken away at birth for «risk
of emotional abuse» and later adopted by strangers; Sir James Munby President
of the family courts recently described the
removal of children from families
as the most drastic matter handled by the courts since the abolition
of capital punishment (hanging).
The Court held that it is unpersuasive to read the Abduction Convention such that summary return is available if, by the time
of the act relied on
as a wrongful
removal or retention, a
child is habitually resident in the state where the application for return is made.
If you are facing a family law challenge such
as divorce,
child custody, domestic violence or
removal of your
children, or you are in need
of simple estate planning, call me at 239-963-8895.
She has experience in a wide range
of contentious family issues including private
children law encompassing the full range of Section 8 Children Act applications and others with international elements, such as permanent removal of children from the jurisdiction, wardship and child ab
children law encompassing the full range
of Section 8
Children Act applications and others with international elements, such as permanent removal of children from the jurisdiction, wardship and child ab
Children Act applications and others with international elements, such
as permanent
removal of children from the jurisdiction, wardship and child ab
children from the jurisdiction, wardship and
child abduction.
If a court has issued an order on non-return pursuant to Article 13
of the 1980 Hague Convention, the court must immediately either directly or through its central authority, transmit a copy
of the court order on non-return and
of the relevant documents, in particular a transcript
of the hearings before the court, to the court with jurisdiction or central authority in the Member State where the
child was habitually resident immediately before the wrongful
removal or retention,
as determined by national law.
In cases
of wrongful
removal or retention
of a
child, the return
of the
child should be obtained without delay, and to this end the Hague Convention
of 25 October 1980 would continue to apply
as complemented by the provisions
of this Regulation, in particular Article 11.
[13] He considered (1) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the
children and Ms. G; (2) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the
children and Mr. S; (3) the desirability
of maximizing contact between the
children and both parents; (4) the views
of the
children, which had not been canvassed; (5) Ms. G's reason for moving; (6) the disruption to the
children of a change in custody; (7) the disruption to the
children consequent on
removal from family, schools, and community; and (8) various other factors, such
as Mr. S's economic stability, the importance
of the paternal grandparents, the location
of the proposed residence at Moyie Lake on a leased lot at an RV park, the girls» relationship with Mr. G and his
children, and Ms. G's inflexibility.
As previously confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Thomson v Thomson, [1994] 3 SCR 551 (CanLII), evidence of «settling in» is not relevant under Art. 12 of the Hague Convention where an application to return a child is brought within one year of the wrongful detention or removal, as was the case on the facts her
As previously confirmed by the Supreme Court
of Canada in Thomson v Thomson, [1994] 3 SCR 551 (CanLII), evidence
of «settling in» is not relevant under Art. 12
of the Hague Convention where an application to return a
child is brought within one year
of the wrongful detention or
removal,
as was the case on the facts her
as was the case on the facts here.
It will concentrate on two high risk populations: those immigrants with
removal orders against them and DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) recipients — undocumented immigrants who came to the United States
as children and have spent most
of their lives here.»
Her periods brought her nothing but pain and discomfort and, furthermore, pregnancy, childbirth and the
removal of the
child would be a catastrophe,
as would the psychological and emotional consequences
of an abortion.
19 In upholding the
removal of the adult
children as their mother's litigation guardian, the Court noted that they could not act in their mother's best interest because they failed to meet this particular criterion
of «indifference».
specialty practices, such
as oral and maxillofacial surgery (
removal of teeth and correction
of facial deformities), orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics (straightening teeth with braces or other appliances), endodontics (root canal treatment), periodontics (treatment
of gum problems), prosthodontics (replacement
of lost teeth) and pediatric dentistry (treatment
of children)
If a
child's habitual residence changes
as a result
of a wrongful
removal or retention, jurisdiction may shift only under very strict conditions.
At a reception at Adelaide Town Hall, more than 60 Indigenous representatives heard Dr Lowitja O?Donoghue outline the policies and effects
of child removal and her own experiences
as one
of the stolen
children.
There was standing room only
as 350 people crowded into the Uniting Church hall on Tuesday evening to hear Mick Dodson, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, and Barbara Nicholson, a local Indigenous woman, speak
of the past policies
of forcibly removing Indigenous
children from their families and to share stories
of their own
removal.
Apologies addressing the
removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
children acted
as a catalyst for wider apologies
as the contemporary representatives
of a people who dispossessed another people.