I identify this approach as «fundamentalist» because the Task Force treats its selection of these particular «competencies» and «understandings»
as res judicata, requiring no further explanation than the fact that eminent and experienced lawyers have signed their names to the report.
Accordingly, a restitution order does not operate
as res judicata to the institution of civil proceedings for incurred damages.
Taking a broader view of the matter, we queried whether the matter might be more appropriately argued
as res judicata, and found an old SCC case to support that position in nearly identical circumstances.
This fourth action was dismissed by Wood, J.
as res judicata and an abuse of process.
Not exact matches
In particular,
as part of a more qualitative approach, one needs to have a look whether the current perceived «turbulences» have also by now reached the more fundamental layers of international law, i.e. meta - rules such
as the ones on sources, State responsibility, State immunity, treaty interpretation, or
res judicata effect of international court decisions must
be abided by the parties involved, to name but a few, the general acceptance of which
is indispensable for a functioning international legal system.
As I reported last May,
Judicata recently came out of several years of stealth mode to unveil what it had promised would
be «a better legal research service.»
[5] Whether this scope will extend to the «recognition» of settlement agreements, however, has not
been finalized
as this recognition could confer a
res judicata effect on agreements in certain jurisdictions, precluding further negotiation.
It followed that if a general challenge had succeeded the matter
was not
res judicata as between the individual and the agent and that had to
be as true for future contracts
as current contracts.
Judicata is finally removing the wraps and beginning to offer access to its service, which its redesigned website describes
as «unprecedented in its precision, relevancy, and simplicity.»
Masters
is now president of the Thiel Foundation and principal at Thiel Capital The other co-founder, Adam Hahn,
is a software engineer who serves
as Judicata's CTO.
[79] In response to perceived difficulties in demanding strict adherence to the constituent elements of
res judicata, modern Canadian courts have developed the independent but related concept of abuse of process
as a means of barring relitigation where permitting it to proceed would offend vital principles such
as judicial economy, consistency, finality of legal disputes, and, perhaps most importantly, the integrity of the judicial decision - making process.
For example, a judgment in rem against an asset outside of England and Wales can not
be enforced for the reason that the assets fall outside of the jurisdiction of the English court; however, a party may seek recognition of that judgment for several reasons, such
as defending claims within England or relying on the findings of the foreign judgment in other proceedings (
res judicata).
The words «without prejudice» in their general adaptation, when used in a decree, mean that there
is no decision of the controversy on its merits, and leaves the whole subject in litigation
as much open to another suit
as if no suit had ever
been brought... When the words «without prejudice» appear in an order or decree, it shows that the judicial act done
is not intended to
be res judicata of the merits of the controversy.
It would then make the substitution for ICBC impossible
as the matter would
be res judicata.
Analytics tools such
as those used by Ravel and other start - ups including Casetext,
Judicata, JustisOne and Lex Machina greatly reduce the amount of time and money that lawyers need to spend on legal research - an area that has not traditionally
been seen
as an area where savings can
be made.
Over the course of the coming months, Color will
be available for an increasing number of cases
as it becomes an integral part of legal research on
Judicata.
Enmax Energy Corp. v. TransAlta Generation Partnership 2015 ABCA 383 Arbitration — Estoppel Summary: The appellant appealed a chambers judge's decision where he held that the parties to an arbitration
were not bound by a prior arbitration award involving the same parties, that a party (in this case, the respondent)
was not estopped from taking certain positions in the current arbitration
as a result of the prior arbitration decision, and that the doctrines of
res judicata and issue estoppel did not apply to arbitration awards.
Since this process did not quality
as litigation between the parties, the doctrine of
res judicata did not bar the Buyers» lawsuit.
185 DOS 05 DOS v. Britt - disclosure of conditions affecting the value or desirability of listed premises; DOS fails its burden of proof;
res judicata; judgment rendered in civil court between buyer and seller
is not controlling in administrative proceeding against licensee where DOS and licensee
were not parties in the civil suit and professional conduct of the licensee
was not litigated; duty of disclosure to a buyer by a seller's agent
is derivative; seller's agent must make the same disclosure to a buyer that the law requires a seller to make; disclosure by seller's agent to buyer's agent of the condition of the property
as known by seller's agent
was timely, proper and essentially a disclosure to buyer of that information; DOS has failed to prove by substantial evidence its allegation that basement flooding
was a common occurrence or that broker
was fully aware that homes in the neighborhood where the property
is located encountered frequent flooding; complaint dismissed
380 DOS 03 Donati v. DOS — prior misconduct; reconsideration;
res judicata; applicant's prior license
as a real estate broker
was suspended by administrative decision (50 DOS 94) requiring respondent to pay restitution
as a condition of consideration of any application by the applicant for a license under Article 12 - A; prior administrative decision
is binding both upon the applicant and the tribunal; tribunal must consider, however, whether under current circumstances, the continued imposition of the condition
is unreasonable; applicant
is 62 years of age, has
been divested of all property, faces destitution and seeks to work
as a salesperson under the direction and supervision of a broker; applicant admits the unlawful acts, expresses remorse and states that under the current circumstances, the prior decision
is a «life sentence;» under the current circumstances, the continued imposition of the prior decision
is unreasonable; application for real estate salesperson license granted