Sentences with phrase «as right an interpretation»

That would be equally as right an interpretation.

Not exact matches

A preamble to an Act can not creates rights and obligation for persons but it can and should be used in the interpretation of the Act, and especially open textured provisions of the Act such as the power of the Minister under s 2 (3)(c) to consider any matter she considers relevant when making an order to require a person to obtain a licence for the export of natural gas, crude oil or refined fuels.

Doc it is unfortunate but as I wrote on a previous page interpretation is not right.

The law as all of the right wing want to claim is not subject to «judicial interpretation» but to be enforced as written.

There are two ways to get interpretation of scripture (as you said right and wrong).

Mason is exactly right in identifying as a key question in a reciprocal Whitehead / Heidegger interpretation the problem whether Whitehead «is a part of the metaphysical tradition which Heidegger seeks to dismantle» (p. 83).

«Although I disagree with painting sexual orientation and gender identity as a biblical sin, Wheaton has a right to that interpretation,» Knapp said.

If the purpose of the legislation of the Sunnah is to expound the legislation of the Qur» an, and if God's policy with His Prophet was to endorse Muhammad's interpretation when it was correct and to guide him to what was right when he made a mistake, then the Sunnah legislation is the same as the legislation of the Qur» an, and equally binding on all Muslims.

Somewhat dubious, I searched for the data, which reveals the pro-lifer was right on the facts but offering an unsupported interpretation: The study showed that the maternal mortality rate declined after abortion was prohibited in 1989, but that it had already been declining for more than a decade, probably as a result of rising levels of women's education.

But we could too easily replace this shallowness by another, cruel as sentimental attitudes inevitably are, which leaves out of account the presence in human life of the sheerly irrevocable, of that which has been done, and it is now too late to undo, of the damage inflicted on others that can not be put right and that no interpretation can possible render edifying.

The utilitarian interpretation stands, above all, under the archetype of the social contract and is consonant with the modern theory of natural rights as derived from John Locke.

But, like pacifism itself, this absolutist interpretation of the right to life found no echo at the time among Catholic theologians, who accepted the death penalty as consonant with Scripture, tradition, and the natural law.

The problem may not be with rights per se, whose articulation is invaluable to our conception of modern republicanism (and may even help more fully articulate what is true about Christian morality), but with an interpretation that takes rights as the whole of moral discourse and therefore, understands the abstract Lockean individual to be a comprehensive account of the human person.

See paragraph 89 of the Center's lawsuit, which alleges that «CRLP advocates» for «interpretations of existing treaties and other international human rights agreements that favor protection of reproductive rights, including abortion, as internationally recognized human rights.»

As J. P. Sanders once said regarding biblical interpretation, «Anytime we read scripture and find ourselves right away on Jesus» side, we have probably misread the passage.»

The Economist presents itself as a definitive source for news and interpretation, so it would help if it wasn't quite so tendentious when writing about the Catholic Church and was a little more careful to get its facts right.

Barr is surely right in insisting that while fundamentalists have made many changes in style (as evidenced, for example, by Christianity Today) on the theological level and especially with regard to biblical interpretation, there is more continuity than discontinuity.

This was never going to last, since heresy and relativism had, of course, never disappeared from the «papal agenda» and neither — perhaps more to the point — had his (and his predecessor's) analysis that disunity in the modern church was the result of a clash between two different interpretations of the Council itself, one right, the other wrong: as Benedict once more explained it, as his first Christmas as Pope approached in December 2005, «On the one hand, there is an interpretation that I would call «a hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture» [i.e., the line peddled by The Tabletfor thirty years]; it has frequently availed itself of the sympathies of the mass media, and also one trend of modern theology.

If I say that I am right, and everyone who agrees with me is going to heaven, and everyone who disagrees with me is going to hell, I have just placed my interpretation of Scripture above Scripture itself, and placed myself in the role of God as the judge over all humanity.

The fantasy story must be significant in its own right and not, as in allegory, always subservient to the interpretation — a situation that casts reins and boundaries upon the imagination.

There really is no such thing as private interpretation; what we do have, and must preserve, is the right of personal conviction.

what would not be allowed is a course that taught that christianity is the correct religion, or an our interpretation of the bible is right masquerading as a science course.

When I read about Calvin and others ideas on what Gods Word says, the Arminian, Lytheran, Wesleyan, Unitarian and various Church denominations and their interpretations, particularly when they hang their whole idea on one part of the Bible to prove how right they are, it affirms what I have always thought since before I was saved by God as well as after that amazing act of grace on His part, that man values and honors the mind far above the heart.

The Bible presupposes a right and a wrong interpretation of Jesus» coming and the nature and character of God, as it uses strong language against false teachers who promote doctrines that undermine the gospel.

The goal is to allow the coexistence of the most contradictory interpretations: maternity, contraception or abortion; voluntary sterilisation or in - vitro fertilisation; sexual relations within or outside marriage, at any age, under any circumstance, as long as one abides by the triple precept of the new ethic: the partners» consent; their health security; and respect for the woman's right to choose.Reproductive health is the Trojan horse of the abortion lobby and of the global sexual revolution.

As a result, he was unaware of the profoundly radical interpretation of Christianity expressed in his civil rights activity and proclaimed in his sermons.

If... it is open for «interpretation'then some of the Churches (and growing in numbers and denominations) have different views as to what the heck is... God's will... right..?

This discovery is riding across country on the irony wagon as I watch the «interpretation» fans lining up right next to the creationist imagineer's as they try to come up with anything and everything they can to dismiss it.

It reaches further than the question as to the right interpretation of Whitehead itself.

Each interpretation presupposed a particular pattern of eschatological outlook; and it is clear that the earliest Christology was really, as the term suggests, an eschatology, in which the central figure was the same — the risen, glorified Christ who had lived and talked and done mighty works in Galilee but had died on a cross outside Jerusalem, who was now at the right hand of God, and was soon to come in glory to inaugurate the New Age.

If the freedom of expression is interpreted in more than the classical negative sense, the positive interpretation makes it necessary to define this right not merely as a liberty but as a claim - right.

Wanda, The religious right want to mix religion with politics to further their agenda — creationism taught as science, public displays of their religious symbols on civil buildings, civil law based upon their interpretation of the bible, etc. etc..

He was challenging my interpretation of Matthew 19 and asserted that if he was wrong and I was right, he would be forced to confess his error to God and to men, but that if he was right and I was wrong, I would not only have to confess my error to God and men, I would also have to revert to living as a man because, he argued, this verse defined me.

A further objection against the existentialist interpretation is that in order to put the right questions to the text it is necessary to have in advance a vital relation to the subject matter of the text, whereas it is impossible to have such a relation to the revelation of God as it is testified in the Scriptures.

Who gave you the right to decide what sin is over some other Christian who doesn't feel the say way; who doesn't have the same interpretation of «the Word» as you??

Some scholars would defend the substantial authenticity of many continuous sections of the discourse, e.g. in the «rabbinical» arguments 7:15 - 24, 8:16 - 19, 10:24 - 38, but for the most part the discourses must be considered as artificially built up around genuine words of Jesus, in an attempt to give what the evangelist considered a right interpretation of some aspect of his teaching as a whole.

Balentine again goes his singular way by finding in God's two «whirlwind» speeches a much more upbeat interpretation than do most scholars, who generally deprecate the speeches as a denial of humankind's right to question God.

I mean, there has to be something to it, right?!? As a referee, I can safely say that there is no reason in the world to come to the conclusion that it's a legitimate goal, no matter what your interpretation is.

Thus, fourthly, some Member States raise point that while the burden - sharing is both legally and morally acceptable (IOW: we will take refugees, of course), the fact is that every country has every right to apply laws as laid down in treaties and can not be bound by their interpretation or suspension by other Member States (IOW: but we will decide who is a refugee and who is not).

As was said in the opening paragraph of this series, a well - rehearsed interpretation of UKIP is that they are a grouping to the right of the current Conservative party, dissatisfied with the old party's failure to stand up to Europe and its perceived leftwards shift under Cameron.

This trajectory parallels an interpretation of international human rights law as progressively abolitionist.

Importantly, the Court did not overturn existing precedent that some in the camp favoring a limit to gun ownership rights point to as an indication that the militia clause is important, but rather found a way to uphold that precedent by clarifying its interpretation.

«As the chief inspector of probation himself implies, the government's interpretation of its own laws on human rights have quite improperly been allowed to undermine public safety.»

The most common interpretation of such rights is that the «rights retained by the people» refer to the inalienable and natural rights as articulated in 18th century America, chief among them the right to self - government.

If they're right and the wave function is real, interpretations like Everett's Many Worlds, which take the reality of the wave function as a given, could start to seem more plausible.

Sathyananda — I follow your free lessons — My view on what the troubled lady is getting very upset about is — Reiki is a beautiful energy that can do no - one any harm, it is for the highest good of all — and when give or sent the higher self of the other person will accept only what is good and right for them — As for displaying the Sacred Symbols — well we must live and let live and not judge what others do - we must do what our own conscience lets us do — personly I do believe to keep them quietly sacred and only seen by us as Reiki Healers - but I do not get so angry and judgemental as it seems the Lady does — sorry just one more thing — Reiki symbols seem to have different forms of interpretation when drawn — there again I believe and trust that it is intention when using them — thank you for your tiAs for displaying the Sacred Symbols — well we must live and let live and not judge what others do - we must do what our own conscience lets us do — personly I do believe to keep them quietly sacred and only seen by us as Reiki Healers - but I do not get so angry and judgemental as it seems the Lady does — sorry just one more thing — Reiki symbols seem to have different forms of interpretation when drawn — there again I believe and trust that it is intention when using them — thank you for your tias Reiki Healers - but I do not get so angry and judgemental as it seems the Lady does — sorry just one more thing — Reiki symbols seem to have different forms of interpretation when drawn — there again I believe and trust that it is intention when using them — thank you for your tias it seems the Lady does — sorry just one more thing — Reiki symbols seem to have different forms of interpretation when drawn — there again I believe and trust that it is intention when using them — thank you for your time

A very popular look right now is «Boho - Chic» which can be sometimes referred to as minimalist farmhouse, or Fixer Upper style, although these are broad terms open to interpretation by the designer.

(And, as with Body Snatchers, Siegel's own liberal interpretation was trumped by a more forceful hard - right reading.

Although far from perfect, the first season of National Geographic's Genius avoided some of the worst cliches of hagiography thanks to Geoffrey Rush and Johnny Flynn's eccentric interpretations of Albert Einstein — and particularly Samantha Colley's fully inhabited performance as Mileva Maric, who was able to come across as exceptional in her own right and not just a flimsy female enabler of male brilliance.

Perhaps some input from remaining band members regarding their interpretation of HWY: An American Pastoral would have been the right move, because I was left craving more details about it as the credits rolled.