So I hereby coin Carey's Law, which holds that trite observations are more likely to be regarded
as sacred principles if someone happens to describe them as laws.
Not exact matches
As Hannah Arendt says, «What saves the act of beginning from its own arbitrariness is that it carries its own principle within itself, or, to be more precise, that beginning and principle, principium and principle, are not only related to each other, but are coeval,» 2 We will want to consider the act of conscious meaning - creation, or conscious taking responsibility for oneself and one's society, as a central aspect of America's myth of origin, an act that, by the very radicalness of its beginning, a beginning ex nihilo as it were, is redolent of the sacre
As Hannah Arendt says, «What saves the act of beginning from its own arbitrariness is that it carries its own
principle within itself, or, to be more precise, that beginning and
principle, principium and
principle, are not only related to each other, but are coeval,» 2 We will want to consider the act of conscious meaning - creation, or conscious taking responsibility for oneself and one's society,
as a central aspect of America's myth of origin, an act that, by the very radicalness of its beginning, a beginning ex nihilo as it were, is redolent of the sacre
as a central aspect of America's myth of origin, an act that, by the very radicalness of its beginning, a beginning ex nihilo
as it were, is redolent of the sacre
as it were, is redolent of the
sacred.
The canon carries within it the
principle that makes it
sacred for us — the meaning - giving testimony of Jesus, which we
as Christians recognize
as primary authority.
It is not possible, according to Catholic teaching, to avoid even the mere possibility of a conflict between
sacred theology and science by delimiting beforehand and on
principle the domain of reality to which the propositions asserted by each refer, in such a way that even the material object of each set of affirmations would be different from the start and
as a consequence no contradiction at all would be possible (Denzinger 2109).
With the coming of the Gentiles to Utah, the political direction of the state has, of course, passed from the church
as church, but even today the economic and social life of the Mormon community is still to an amazing degree determined by the
principles taught in their
sacred book.
But
as men became more and more aware of moral
principles and
as their thinking was «rationalized», the way in which the
sacred was understood, the way in which men came to interpret the more - than - human, was in terms of love and of «persuasion» (
as Whitehead put it), although it never lost the awesome quality which evoked from them worship and adoration.
The Establishment Clause thus stands
as an expression of
principle on the part of the Founders of our Const.itution that religion is too personal, too
sacred, too holy, to permit its «unhallowed perversion» by a civil magistrate.»
It is one evidence of how sweeping was this establishment of independent territories that the ideal of academic freedom now emerged
as the most
sacred of all
principles within the new academic professions.
The first is by treating
as sacred the trappings of civil religion rather than its
principles,
as in the case of superpatriots, for example.
Only after these
sacred principles are violated do people enter into a second realm of decisions, in which moral considerations are weighted
as against others, and calculations enter (e.g., people sometimes calculate how much to give — or if they give X, what it will do for their reputation, and so on).