Sentences with phrase «as saying they object»

Not exact matches

Proponents say such laws are necessary to give businesses run by owners with strong religious principles a legal exemption should they be asked to perform a service — such as cater or photograph a same - sex wedding — to which they object.

(It's a complicated argument that boils down to two sides: One saying many games treat women as sexual objects and the other side arguing that «social justice warriors» are trying to change the hobby they enjoy.)

«Bennett has become a master of storytelling through character, and while there are clearly no people in these films, it was clearly a very human story, which we knew a director such as Bennett would zero in on and draw out very real human - like emotions from these poor inanimate objects,» Lennon said.

Col. Patrick Touron of the gendarme service said DNA samples have been taken from objects provided by victims» families, such as combs or toothbrushes, that could help identify them.

That ruling says businesses may object on religious grounds to offering health services stipulated by the ACA, such as abortion services and fertility drugs.

Of all the candidates, Cuban says he would most like to sit down with Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, even though he objects to Sanders's stance as a democratic socialist and plan to levy a special tax on billionaires.

It only took seven hours for the team to whip out the object as opposed to the 22 hours it took the team to make the prototype using more traditional methods, she said.

If one were to count small objects like fasteners as unique parts, Pincus said each MakerBot typically comprises several hundred parts.

«We want them to go to companies that will put them in the sorts of applications we know they can succeed at,» says Brooks — tasks such as picking up an object from a conveyor and putting it into a bin.

«This unusually big variation in brightness means that the object is highly elongated: about 10 times as long as it is wide, with a complex, convoluted shape,» said Karen Meech from the Institute for Astronomy in Hawaii.

He said he was planning to oust several lower - down State and Defense Department officials who might object to economic war with China; he named Susan Thornton, the principal deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, as one example of someone he wants to fire.

A person involved in the investigation said, however, that experts from Boeing and the National Transportation Safety Board who had seen the object, a piece of what is known as a flaperon, were not yet fully satisfied, and called for further analysis.

«The radars they use are apparently meant for detecting moving objects (as typically used in adaptive cruise control systems), and seem to be not very good in detecting stationary objects,» he says.

Needless to say, competing Canadian stations (who had to meet Canadian content obligations as part of their licence conditions) objected.

The sources said Pruitt's decision to put Greenwalt in charge of his international travel, which came just months into his tenure at EPA, fit a pattern of Pruitt assigning the most sensitive responsibilities to his small cadre of aides who had previously worked with him in Oklahoma before he became EPA administrator — aides who sources said were more likely to acquiesce to his demands, even as other EPA staffers objected to Pruitt's spending and travel decisions.

Reason says that an object that's twice as heavy as another falls twice as fast.

The official objected, saying, «I love your children as much as you do, Senator».

As Martin Luther once said, «Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying the object which is abused.

A daughter at the table says it quietly, head over her dinner, «Women aren't made as an object for man's purposes.

His comments drew fire from secularists, with a letter to The Daily Telegraph signed by 50 public figures headed by the president of the British Humanist Association, Professor Jim Al - Khalili saying: «We object to his characterisation of Britain as a «Christian country» and the negative consequences for politics and society that this engenders.»

As Whitehead says,» «Change» is the description of the adventures of eternal objects in the evolving universe of actual things» (PR 59 / 92).

As Whitehead says in Science and the Modern World (p. 160), «Since the relationships of A [an eternal object] to other eternal objects stand determinately in the essence of A, it follows that they are internal relations.»

In terms of eternal objects we may say that he reaches as far as the most distant standpoint he has made relevant by associating it with a specific eternal object (thereby perhaps making that eternal object first relevant).

Whilst our spiritual intellect's knowing of physical things is said to need as object the uniquely knowable universal, the final object of our spiritual, intellectual knowing is proposed as the non-universal individual.

It is not a natural thing for people to draw a sharp separation between religion and politics as distinct realms, to demand responsible participation in both and simultaneously to say that the object of one (God) is the criterion for the object of the other (the exercise of power).

Even though Whitehead says «the novelty received from the aggregate diversities of bodily expressions... requires decision» to reduce it to a coherent expression (Modes 36), still the diversities once received are determinate object / parts logically required to remain as they are in order to retain the self - identity of the process / whole.

In order to interpret this core - principle of revelation, we must understand its essential presupposition; namely, that events are present «in» other events - present not just abstractly (through «eternal objects»), i.e., mediated by the «general,» but as singular events that effect their further history by their unique concreteness (PR 338).12 Whitehead recognizes precisely this constellation when he says:» [T] he truism that we can only conceive in terms of universals has been stretched to mean that we can only feel in terms of universals.

He says «indetermination [as to how inherited objects will fit into the actuality's satisfaction], rendered determinate in the real concrescence, is the meaning of «potentiality»» (Process 23), but indeterminacy is not about which of several «modes» (Process 23) will be fulfilled; the mode to be fulfilled has not yet been exactly specified.

Any entity, thus intervening in processes transcending itself, is said to be functioning as an «object».

4 And there is the relativistic motion of objects moving near the speed of light (wavelength shifts red as its, let's say rate of time, diminishes) and this is not dependent on direction as the Doppler effect is.

- «The scholarly community will need to see the full report and images of the artifacts to make a judgment in regard to the interpretation of these objects as coins,» Steven Ortiz, associate professor of archaeology and biblical backgrounds at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth, Texas, said.

As I said, regardless of our «orientation», sexual drive is so complex we can not always know why we are «turned on'to the object of our desire.

Preachers who allow themselves a playful measure of «pastoral omnipotence» over the text - as - object stand to discover things in and through it that elude their more timorous colleagues, he says.

«Each «section» of the stream, says James, «would then be a bit of sciousness or knowledge of this sort, including and contemplating its «me» and its «not - me» as objects which work out their drama together, but not yet including or contemplating its own subjective being» (PP1 304).

He is the ruler of the church just as He had been the leader of His little band of followers: He is the head (or, we would say, the heart) of the church just as He had been the center of interest and unity among them; He is the object of devotion, even worship, in the church just as He had been the object of His disciples» loyalty.

The physical prehension as conformal feeling, we have said, reproduces the object by assuming the subjective form of one of its prehensions, but as vector it is, and remains throughout the «life» of the subject, an essential relation to that individual object as other, as there and then.

He does not say so in so many words, but the objective lure seems to be constituted of all the eternal objects making up the various past actual occasions physically prehended, as these eternal objects are mutually interrelated.

In this version the sense presentation as symbol is said to stand for the physical object with which it is causally correlated, not to another experience.

It is true, as Professor Buchler points out, that Whitehead says that «agency belongs exclusively to actual occasions» and that he also speaks of an eternal object as being «an agent in objectification.»

For Sherburne, then, the art object, as a proposition, is about meaning, or theory; it is something that may or may not be said about events that may or may not belong together.

In doing this, says Trüb, the analyst must avoid the intimacy of a private I - Thou relationship with the patient, on the one hand, and the temptation of dealing with the patient as an object, on the other.

It also says that electrons and protons are societies, but it gives no indication as to whether they are spatially thick, structured societies (my view) or enduring objects (Cobb's view) except where Whitehead speculates about the dimly discerned «yet more ultimate actual entities — this could be taken to imply that electrons and protons are complex, made up of distinct types of subordinate entities, and this would support my claim that electrons and protons are structured societies.

Just as an eternal object, say, redness, gives no information about itself save when it ingresses in or is realized in the red shirt or the red book, so too, a proposition as such «tells no tale about itself» (PR 256f / 391 -3).

He is often said to have inaugurated the «subjective turn» — credited with recognizing that we have to start from an analysis of consciousness and treat all the «objects» of our knowledge as shaped, distorted, conditioned by our «subjective» filters.

If he had said that many Protestants view their churches as human constructs, or even that many Protestants have never given a moment's thought to whether their churches are «human constructs,» I would not object.

According to Kant, to say nothing of common moral sense, human beings are subjects and as such should never to be treated as mere instruments or objects.

Take, bless, break, give — the bread was taken and offered to God; thanksgiving was said over it — and here we need to recall that for the Jew, all blessings have always been in the form of a thanksgiving to God for the objects which are to be blessed; the bread was broken, as Christ had done at the Last Supper and as His physical body was broken on the Cross; the bread was given — distributed, so that the believer might partake of it and thereby, as the Church believed, partake of Christ Himself and become one with Him.

That is to say, man is not, as pure naturalism would have it, merely an object in nature which is acted upon and reacts according to fixed general laws, a passive receiver of prior causes and a non-willing, non-responsible transmitter of future effects, whose consciousness and action are completely caught up in the causal nexus of matter and time.

«From indetermination accepted as a fact,» Bergson claims that he can «infer the necessity of a perception, that is to say, of a variable relation between a living being and the more or less distant influence of objects which interest it» (MM 24).

What does Kant say about freedom as the object of the postulate of practical reason?