I'm a very sensual as well
as sexual person.
What is important is coming to terms with
yourself as a sexual person and knowing what you want and when you want it.
Not exact matches
«DEAFENING SILENCE:» TIME recently named the men and women who spoke out against
sexual assault and harassment
as TIME's
Person of the Year.
Polish scientists have shown that male and female preferences for a height difference (known scientifically
as sexual dimorphism) change based on how tall they are, perhaps so that
people can widen their own dating pool.
As more and more people opt to make their diverse sexual and gender identities public, and as choice - craving individuals seek clothing that perfectly reflects their personal style, retail and fashion insiders expect sales of androgynous duds to climb in the years ahea
As more and more
people opt to make their diverse
sexual and gender identities public, and
as choice - craving individuals seek clothing that perfectly reflects their personal style, retail and fashion insiders expect sales of androgynous duds to climb in the years ahea
as choice - craving individuals seek clothing that perfectly reflects their personal style, retail and fashion insiders expect sales of androgynous duds to climb in the years ahead.
The reports detailed other examples of
people having their warnings of
sexual assault at Mexican resorts taken down on the same basis
as Love's, or because the website claimed they were second - hand information.
As an employer, you are not permitted to ask questions about a
person's age, race, creed,
sexual orientation or marital status.
What constitutes
sexual harassment in the workplace varies, but
as theAAUW notes, it includes behaviors like «unwelcome
sexual advances, requests for
sexual favors, direct or indirect threats or bribes for
sexual activity,
sexual innuendos and comments, sexually suggestive jokes, unwelcome touching or brushing against a
person,» among others.
Under this law, it is illegal to distribute
sexual images or videos of someone without his or her consent, so long
as it is intended to cause serious emotional distress and so long
as the
person depicted experiences distress.
«Beginning with my first day at Uber, I have been committed to building a diverse Business Team that would be widely recognized
as the best in the technology world: one that is welcoming to
people of all genders,
sexual orientations, national origins and educational backgrounds,» he wrote, according to Recode, which obtained a copy of his email.
Diverse data: In a briefing with reporters, NIH officials said they are focusing on gathering health and genetic data from diverse and historically underrepresented groups — including ethnic and
sexual minorities,
as well
as people with disabilities, with less than a high school education, and with income below the poverty level.
As for Jesus, he mentions this passage once and I see his affirmation of 3 things (also found in rabbinic works): 2 becomes 1 in these ways --(a)
sexual union (closest we can get to the original creation); (b) children (2 seperate dna's in one
person); (c) Companionship — to combat our lonliness.
To be sure, there are those (such
as the three hundred plus self - described «lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and allied activists, scholars, educators, writers, artists, lawyers, journalists, and community organizers,» including such notables
as Gloria Steinem, Barbara Ehrenreich, and Kenji Yoshino), who have already signed on (quite literally) to the proposition that there are no reasons of principle (or valid reasons of any kind) for conceiving marriage or the equivalent
as a two -
person relationship,
as opposed to a relationship of three or more individuals (triads, quadrads, etc.) in a polyamorous
sexual partnership.
Beginning with my first day at Uber, I have been committed to building a diverse Business Team that would be widely recognized
as the best in the technology world: one that is welcoming to
people of all genders,
sexual orientations, national origins and educational backgrounds.
First, is there really a secret dossier about a network of
people inside the Vatican who are linked by their
sexual orientation,
as Italian newspaper reports have alleged?
But what is the reason of principle that can be given by those who, while rejecting the idea that
sexual - reproductive complementarity is an essential element of marriage, do not --- or do not yet --- wish to give up the idea of marriage
as the sexually exclusive union of two, and not more than two,
persons?
Also I suspect it would be easier to grow if
people would stop forming their safe world hypothesis of why they are gay and leave them the hell alone about something
as deeply private
as their
sexual orientation and let them get on with their faith.
It's not surprising that the
people who create movies are
as affected by the racism,
sexual abuse and violence that has pockmarked the news for the past few years
as the rest of us, but Hollywood is only offering a diagnosis here.
Or why you don't usually see gay characters in TV or movies unless their
sexual orientation is part of the plot —
as opposed to simply representing the statistically probably number of gay
people in any group.
But what is the reason for those who propose to ditch the conjugal understanding of marriage and replace it with a conception of marriage
as sexual - romantic domestic partnership (what one opponent of the conjugal conception describes
as your relationship «with your Number One
Person»)?
From this heavily fortified definitional base George and Bradley reason that
sexual acts of the reproductive type typically further the good of marriage, and
persons (whether married or not) who engage in
sexual acts of the nonreproductive type «necessarily treat their bodies and those of their
sexual partners (if any)
as means or instruments in ways that damage their personal (and interpersonal) integrity.»
But
as a human being he understands all kinds of situations, and he is open to all kinds of
people, including those with different
sexual characteristics.»
«Probably more
people have learned to think of us
as human beings, but they'll still think of us
as primarily
sexual human beings,» said one lesbian activist.
Ironically, it is somewhat homophobic to think that gay
people need a different rule from everyone else,
as if we are less capable of
sexual holiness than straight
people.
Following the widespread accusations of rape, harassment and
sexual abuse perpetrated by Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, actress Alyssa Milano wrote on Twitter, «If all the women who have been sexually harassed or assaulted wrote «Me too»
as a status, we might give
people a sense of the magnitude of the problem.»
There are few things
as deep to a
person's self - identity
as their
sexual orientation and gender identity... and few treasures held so deeply.
Biola then issued a «statement on human sexuality» saying, «God's design for marriage and sexuality is the foundational reason for viewing acts of
sexual intimacy between a man and a woman outside of marriage, and any act of
sexual intimacy between two
person of the same sex,
as illegitimate moral options for the confessing Christian.»
However, we are all created
as sexual beings and sex, or sexuality, also has a much wider sense in which the love held within the soul is expressed through our sexuality in warmth, affection and tenderness, without an erotic element, and done so in an appropriate way depending on the
persons involved.
Wesley Hill understands that,
as a faithfully Christian homosexual man, he is not in the only category of
people who are not called to
sexual activity.
This news was based on a confidential Oxfam report that cited Oxfam's chief official for Haiti relief among other senior staff members
as people who took part in the
sexual misconduct.
I am not one who would say that I approve of
sexual relations outside of marriage, but I have come to be less judgmental and more compassionate; I have come to understand behavior patterns
as appropriate for some
people in some circumstances even though they could never be called ideal nor could they ever be fully acceptable to me or for me.
I have met many
people like this
person in my life and they all try their best to get me to accept their
sexual behavior
as something they were «born» with.
Stop focusing on the
sexual aspect and focus on two
people becoming one,
as written in Ephesians.
The real test of love
as seen in the deeper moral traditions of mankind, and in the Christian faith, is the willingness of
persons to commit their lives and
sexual being faithfully to one another «till death do us part».29
Indeed those
people who are so afraid of exploring a new basis for
sexual morality might well examine their own unconscious motivation, for fear frequently masks desire which is regarded
as unacceptable; when the superstructure of repression is threatened that fear becomes violent anger.
During the Independent Inquiry into Child
Sexual Abuse (IICSA), one
person who gave evidence was asked how the church can deal with the abuse of power and replied: «It needs to stop squelching discussion, it has a way of crushing
people when they try to speak and it needs to treat
people as adults not children.»
Sexual orientation has been the focal point for quite some time for special attention in law to overcome disadvantage (real or alleged) for those with attraction to
persons of the same sex; and now, increasingly those who wish to change sex or dress
as a
person of the opposite sex.
Your tone is
as if it delights
people to promote the idea of
sexual purity for some offhanded reason when in fact the only reason someone would believe it is because the Bible suggests that it's God's command.
I object to Stanton Jones» use of the words homosexuality and heterosexuality
as equivalent descriptions of different kinds of
sexual behavior, because doing so ignores the facts that 1) «heterosexuality» is the result of the allocation of genetic material at conception that determines which reproductive organs
people are born with» male or female» and 2) «homosexuality» is
sexual action by
people who are heterosexual.
The Concordant Literal translates the two words
as «sodomites» (those who practice sodomy — either anal sex (an act not limited to m / m pairs, although they do practice it; the NIV uses the phrase «shrine prostitute») or zoophilia (
person / animal)-RRB- and «catamites» (young boys kept by older men for
sexual purposes; it is suggested by some scholars that the boy the Centurion asked Jesus to heal in the Gospels was a «kept boy»).
Indeed, homosexual
persons are called to live out the inclination which is natural for them, namely, in fidelity to another
person of the same sex, and enjoying
sexual acts not primarily for pleasure but
as expressions of love.
The physical and emotional attraction of another
person laden with the possibilities of
sexual fulfilment may lead to the will to unite one life with another, and to an acceptance of the needs of the other
as redirecting the course of life.
People who have self - control don't eat like pigs, buy things they can't afford in order to feel better about themselves, or engage in
sexual activity
as if it were only a game.
While I think it's irresponsible to blame family and friends for a loved one's suicide, I believe it's just
as irresponsible to ignore the reality that gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth are four times more likely to attempt suicide
as straight peers, that nearly half of young transgender
people have considered taking their lives, and that LGBT youth who come from families who reject their gender identities or
sexual orientations are more than eight times more likely to attempt suicide than those who come from supportive families.
Again, sorry for the long post, but I do believe that there are many aspects that I touch on, that many
people haven't considered, in their questioning of some forms of
sexual expression
as being a «sin».
Treating homosexual activity
as a private matter (and some
people now treat group
sexual activity this way
as well) shapes our society's mores.
Some
people using church
as a venue for exhibitionism / voyerism isn't healthy or functional, and isn't about the mutual / consenting / healthy
sexual pleasure of the parties involved.
We've isolated and condemned homosexuality
as an especially egregious sin because 1) it's a
sexual thing (and we're obsessed with sex), 2) it's relatively easy to identify and name, (unlike gossip and materialism and greed, which are condemned more often in the Bible and are more pervasive in our culture), and 3) it is «other,» (when you're straight, and in no danger of committing homosexual acts yourself, it's easy to call it an abomination because it's easier to remove specks from others
people's eyes.)
Every
person has a need for the pleasures of the mind and the body; these include
sexual, intellectual, aesthetic, interpersonal, and spiritual satisfactions,
as well
as adventure derived from new experiences.
All they had to do was refrain from things that Jewish
people found incredibly offensive, such
as sexual immorality and from eating food sacrificed to idols.