While these devices can function
as simple viewing screens, smartphones and tablets can be more than a portable television.
Not exact matches
Chamath Palihapitiya, the CEO of venture capital firm Social Capital, says he's a big fan of Bezos» letters because they serve
as a reminder to keep a long - term
view, while keeping things
simple.
After working
as a director and senior merchant at Victoria's Secret, Michelle Cordeiro Grant wanted to create a new experience and point of
view in the lingerie category, one that delivers
simple, quality products and reflects the healthy, confident, and beautiful women wearing them.
Our
view has been that, no, US is preeminent across a broad range, everything from
as simple a factor
as demographics, to something like innovation, to incredible corporate management.
A log, which can be
as simple as a well - kept electronic calendar, also provides an honest
view of where someone is spending his or her time and is a good way to assess if adjustments should be made.
Disabling «right - click»
as a way to
view your website code is annoying to users because it also disables every other «right - click» function, and there are
simple workarounds that every hacker knows anyway.
The truth is, a compassionate
view of marketing is
as simple to summon
as it is hopelessly unfashionable.
According to studies conducted by researchers in the U.K. and Turkey, something
as simple as the suit a man wears can have a direct impact on how people
view his character.
«The psychiatrist sees symptoms of diagnosable conditions in everyone from the grocery checkout cashier to his spouse; the economist
views the
simple buying of a cup of coffee
as an example of a macroeconomic phenomenon.»
In
simple terms, the EVM could be
viewed as one giant environment conducive for building bigger, better, and powerful smart contracts.
Many
view volume
as a validator of a move, since it is a
simple measure of participation.
That could be
viewed as even more valuable than executing
simple tasks.
This only conditions a child's mind to notice these things and
view them
as forbidden, rather than training them for self - control through the
simple acknowledgement that humans are by nature sexual beings, and that the female form is beautiful, something to be appreciated and not objectified.
Not all Jews believe this, BTW, but in Judaism I have yet to run across someone who believe that G - d would punish anyone for their «beliefs» and not their «deeds» (take a good look at the Tanach... the contract with the Jews (known
as the «teachings of G - d», not «the law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to
view «the teachings of G - d» (the law)
as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the
simple question..
Biblical interpretation naturally absorbs a lot of ink; but «modern biblical scholars» will be surprised to learn that many of them regard miracle stories
as fictions «designed to influence the common folk of an ancient and more
simple time»: a
view closer to old - fashioned anticlericalism of Thomas Paine's vintage than modern scholarship even of a radical stripe.
Regardless of your
views, I still have my personal faith, you may condemn me
as simple minded or living in a fantasy world, but having witnessed first hand good triumphing over evil, I shall leave you to decide your own journey in life.
All that Bergson asserts — and we shall see that in many of his texts Whitehead implicitly adopts the same
view — is that this difference, real
as it is, is nevertheless only that of degree, not that of nature, for one
simple reason: that the past is always totally immanent in the present, even though in different degrees of vividness.
Dreams, for example, were given a high place
as media of divine revelation; (Genesis 20:3; 26:24 - 25; 28:10 - 16; 31:24; 37:5; 41:1; 46:1 - 4; Judges 7:13 - 15; I Kings 3:5 - 15 etc.) omens were trusted, such
as the first word to be uttered at an expected meeting, (I Samuel 14:8 - 15) or a chance action regarded
as a sign, (Genesis 24:12 - 14) or wind in the mulberry - trees taken
as Yahweh's command to join battle; (II Samuel 5:22 - 24) and, in general, dealing with the superhuman world suggested nothing so
simple and spiritual
as private communion in prayer, but rather a whole array of magical techniques and, from the modern point of
view, incredible superstitions.
This is a result of the history [210] of substance metaphysics, with its multiplicity of historical approaches.4 The notion of a uniform,
simple concept of substance must itself be
viewed as the product of a critique of substance that began with Locke and was generalized in the nineteenth century.
You characterize opposing
views as rationalizations, point out what is complicated to others it
simple to you, your
views are based on faith and biblical study where others are based on emotion and whatever feels good, Etc..
Putting the focus back on chastity might help us remember that repentance and redemption are always possible,
as well
as encourage us to
view sexual behavior in a wider context of self - control, bodily respect, and patience, rather than
as a
simple prohibition against a particular physical action.»
Many will interpret his
views as a
simple capitulation to culture.
If they
view God's judgment
as a
simple negativity, and react defensively against it, he must acknowledge and articulate this error, and demonstrate that it is an error.
«14 Following the assumption of
simple location, 15 the cosmology derived from Galileo, Newton and Descartes persistently
views the objects isolated by scientific method
as though they were the fundamental units of the physical world itself.
To summarize this
view far too briefly: Privation,
as opposed to
simple absence or negation, is the lack of some part of a being's nature,
as when a human being is deprived of sight.
For a summary of some of the scientific research which supports the
view that the fetus is not a prepackaged human being (e.g., even something so relatively
simple as a fingerprint arises at least in part due to chance events not present in a fertilized egg) see Charles Gardner, «Is an Embryo a Person?
The now prevailing
view, and perhaps the
simplest and best, regards the Song of Solomon
as a collection of frank, uncomplicated poems of erotic love.
Here we see unknown writers in the hills of ancient Judah, seated in
simple homes that from the point of
view of our present - day luxury might be regarded
as little better than hovels, surrounded with furnishings more bare and austere than those of a medieval monastery, equipped with
simple reed pens and rolls of papyrus, or perhaps with broken sherds of old pots,
as they slowly indite in awkward, ancient Hebrew characters, words that have run like fire and are potent at this distant day.
This is the point where I can not accept Karl Barth's position
as a
simple restatement of the original Christian
view, not even his position in the Church Dogmatics (K. Barth, Die Kirchliche Dogmatik, II, I [1940], pp. 698ff; III 2 [1948], pp. 524ff, 714ff.)
In
view of the current brouhaha over foundationalism, so - called, it seems advisable to address the issue of wherein what I have grudgingly called foundational analysis consists, at least
as it is practiced by Ogden.26 Again, the point is a
simple one.
Whitehead obviously
viewed the applicability of the concept of a
simple occasion
as conditioned by a complex process of «extensive division».
That those who cling to evolutionism would strip us of what makes us human may seem far - fetched and conspiratorially minded, but try to
view the suggestion less
as an accusation of coordination and more
as a
simple statement that ideas matter.
From his point of
view the rejection of the nineteenth - century biographies
as modernizations need in no sense involve a rejection of the quest itself, for the
simple reason that an initial prejudice once detected does not justify the permanent end of a scholarly project.
And, since Whitehead defines «matter»
as anything which has this property of
simple location (SMW 72), his doctrine that all actual entities have prehensions that are vectors constitutes his rejection of a materialistic
view of nature.
Whitehead is prepared to have a
view of the passage of nature
as an actively patterning process, not
simple as succession in time, which is why the analysis of it
as sliced into events by itself is insufficient
as leaving out this active patterning aspect.
Basically, the Bible is more immoral than moral (Leviticus 20:10 - 27; Exodus 22:18; Judges 11:30 - 40; II Samuel 12:9 - 18; Numbers 31:17; Luke 19:22 - 31; and according to the myth, God, the creator and most powerful thing ever, let his son be killed when a
simple «timeout» would have been sufficient), and we'll all be better off when the Christian / Jewish / Islamic gods and stories are
viewed as myths, just
as today we know Zeus, Apollo, Ra, Thor, Buddha, etc. are myths.
This point of
view, which certainly seems to take dynamism
as intrinsic to all our experience such that we have
simple ideas of relational events, of change, is in keeping with the intent of Whitehead's belief in the primacy of process.
The agnostic note certainly creeps into St. Thomas's doctrine and one reason is that he saw the paradoxes involved in combining the
view of God
as simple, immutable, and impassible with the biblical language about God
as Father, Son, and Spirit, begetting the Son, and Creating and Redeeming the World.
If, unlike Mrs. R., a wife does not volunteer information about the husband's
view of his problem, a
simple question such
as, «Does your husband feel he has a problem with alcohol?»
It was, then, over two decades before he published Origin of Species that Darwin replaced biblical literalism with a «more
simple and sublime» theology, one in which God is
viewed as ordaining that creation operate without interference, through the natural law that he established.
It's
simple as this, Rick Santorum appeals to the less educated, extremely conservative and more bigot minded segment of rural America, which is largely dominated by Born again evangelicals, who
as the article points out have a misguided
view that that Mormons aren't Christian, and in their misguided bigotry seem to be voting against Romney based upon their religion rather than for a good candidate who can win the general election.
All Christians and Jews, and that meant nearly all Europeans, accepted this
simple view of origins
as a matter of course until about a hundred years ago, and some Christians still cling firmly to it with varying modifications.
In fact, it does not overstate the case to say that the Roman Catholic
view on justification sets it apart
as a wholly different religion than the true Christian faith, for it is ant.ithetical to the
simple gospel of grace.
Because of the complex interaction of religious broadcasting with other social characteristics such
as broader religious and cultural movements, changing social uses of mass media, and changing historical circumstances, it is unlikely that a
simple cause - effect relationship between the
viewing of religious programs on television and individual faith and church interaction could ever be isolated.
As a doctor, I'm surprised you have such a rather
simple view of the world.
In the context of the Newtonian world
view, this meant that God, if posited at all
as the cause of the world, was only the initiator of a much
simpler and less impressive world than ours.
Thus, Bergson's proto - mentalism is also interpretable
as the positive face of the critique of
simple location.4 The fallacy of
simple location is the basis for the
view, in both physical and logical atomism, that the «individuality of the atom [and of objects in general] is based precisely on its [or their] ontological separation from other simply located entities» (BMP 309).
Unfortunately, things are rarely that
simple in today's foodservice industry where growth aspirations serve
as clouds that can obstruct an organization's
view of their customers.
As consumers continue to search for healthy, natural and «simpler» products, water products are likely to be viewed as solution
As consumers continue to search for healthy, natural and «
simpler» products, water products are likely to be
viewed as solution
as solutions.
«I've always
viewed Boodles Gin favorably
as a baseline gin for all my drinks because it is
simple and clean,» explained Tom Walker.