Sentences with phrase «as slave owners»

In past paintings, including a monumental mural commissioned for the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art's atrium, Marshall has called attention to Jefferson and Washington as slave owners, and their respective estates — Monticello and Mount Vernon — as plantations operated via slave labor.

The group, armed with knives, axes and whatever they can find, goes on a killing spree, using the Bible as justification, just as slave owners used the Bible to show that slavery has always existed

No just as the Slave owners of our first Civil War, who needed African slaves on their Plantations, to make them economically viable for the Southern Aristocracy to maintain their affluence, the Anti Gov forces of today seek a totally deregulated American economy.

Regardless, Slaves as well as slave owners were subject to punishment.

It's not entirely clear and doesn't provide near as much evidence to oppress a people as the slave owners of the south, had!!!

«Tell Massa»,» he said, an apparent reference to Mr. Trump as a slave owner, «tell Mr. Trump not to miss his ride.»

Fassbender is wild - eyed as the slave owner emasculated by his shrewish, controlling wife (Sarah Paulson), Cumberbatch is warm and paternal as the slightly - more - compassionate Ford, and Pauls Dano and Giamatti have a particular flair for playing despicable characters that they display here.

Correspondence from home forced his attention to his responsibilities as a slave owner.

Not exact matches

Trump grouped former presidents George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, who fought to create the United States, together as «slave owners,» with southern leaders Lee, Jefferson Davis and Stonewall Jackson.

As such, was He not, in so many words, calling for the land owners, slave owners and wealth hoarders to cede their ownings for re-distribution, as the Torah proclaimed should happen every 50 yearAs such, was He not, in so many words, calling for the land owners, slave owners and wealth hoarders to cede their ownings for re-distribution, as the Torah proclaimed should happen every 50 yearas the Torah proclaimed should happen every 50 years?

I think it's funny how this article describes the martyr Felicity as a slave girl, but leaves out the fact that her owner was her fellow martyr Perpetua!

Why didn't your omnipotent god tell slave owners that owning people was wrong and that they should instead pay their slaves as free workers?

However Christian bashing and discrimination — ESPECIALLY Catholic bashing in modern society is regrettably as alive and well as a bigotted southern plantation slave owner in the 1840s.

I would be speculating as to why one should not free these acquired slaves into a land where they (slaves) could not survive without an owner.

when he sent the letter in Philemon... he told the slave owner to «love the slave as a brother» if again, one truly loves another... they would not enslave them

The book of Philemon is a letter from Paul that exhorts the slave owner to accept the return of his runaway slave as an equal... a brother.

God's answer to slave owners taking a rod and beating their elderly female slaves (even breaking their bones as long as they didn't die «in a day or so») was there was to be NO VENGEANCE taken on them.

And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter.

This is part of the approach abolitionists and first wave feminists propose as they developed a method of interpreting Scripture that exposed both theological errors and the self - interest of slave - owner.

If you were active in opposing things like gay rights people a hundred years from now will remember you at least as well as we remember slave owners these days.

But all people are no Christian secondly we as African Americans was taught by our slave owners of Christianity.

In his life as a slave who was passed from one owner to another in the manner of chattel property.

e. man + brother's widow, («Levirate» marriage) f. rapist and his victim, (Deuteronomy 22), g. male solders and their female prisoners, which can include virgin girls, who are still children, h. as «assigned», (female slave to the owners male slave).

And even Paul in his letter to the salve owner Philemon tells Philemon to treat his runaway slave as «a brother in Christ,» and to recieve him and have grace and mercy upon him.

His attempts to justify slavery are nonsensical and take the typical dishonest approach of equating slavery with modern day employment or indentured servitude (glossing over verses that permit «owners» to beat their slaves so long as they do not die immediately).

Paul's little note to Philemon, for example, hardly more than a page long and concerned largely with an owner's relations with a slave, refers to Jesus as many as ten times.

And just as we no longer countenance slavery, which both Old and New Testaments regarded as normal, so we also no longer countenance the use of female slaves, concubines and captives as sexual toys or breeding machines by their male owners, which Leviticus 19:20 f., II Samuel 5:13 and Numbers 31:17 - 20 permitted — and as many American slave owners did slightly over 100 years ago.

A slave could be beaten as severely as the owner desired, short of directly killing the slave and so long as the slave's eyes and teeth were not damaged (Exodus 21:20 - 21; 26 - 27).

First off, this ignores the distinction between Israelite indentured servants and foreign slaves which were explicitly described as personal property of the slave owner which could be passed on to the slave owner's descendants.

Consequently, one of the greatest problems of the early church was in getting Christian slave owners and Christian slaves to treat each other as spiritual equals.

But that same God also told the owners to love and treat their slaves as brothers.

While insiders characterize Luter's anticipated election as a watershed moment for a denomination started by slave owners, some observers outside the SBC voice skepticism about the true potential impact on race relations.

When the owner sends his slaves to collect the produce, the tenants beat them and even kill one of them; when he sends his son, they kill him as well.

But if the early church could survive — and in fact, thrive amidst persecution — when it included both Jews and Gentiles, zealots and tax collectors, slaves and owners, men and women, those in support of circumcision and those against it, those staunchly opposed to eating food that had been sacrificed to idols and those who felt it necessary, then I think modern American Christianity can survive when it includes democrats and republicans, biblical literalists and biblical non-literalists, Calvinists and Arminians... so long as we're not rooting for one another's demise.

Maybe you prefer to teach «Christian values» such as murder and torture a la the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Holocaust, being most all the slave owners in the USA, the Salem witch trials, etc, etc. you are an ugly bigot.

Indeed, one law in Exodus, intended to make the lot of slaves more tolerable, goes only so far as to declare the owner liable to punishment if, in beating a slave, he kills him outright, whereas if the wounded slave «continue a day or two» the owner escapes penalty, «for he is his money.

Legislation was passed that was intended as preparation for the emancipation of slaves, but the slave - owners would not co-operate.

Religion can teach people that owing slaves is OK, remember that just a short while ago in history our white slave owners based their right to own slaves as religious right because of the mark of Cain.

From our role as wet nurses in slavery being forced to breastfeed and nurture our slave owners children often to the detriment of our children, to the lack of mainstream role models and multi-generational support, to our own stereotyping within our community — we have a different dialogue around breastfeeding and it needs special attention.

Freedom understood as non-domination, or the absence of arbitrary power, captures the experience and injustice of having a master, whether they are a king, a slave - owner, a capitalist, or a patriarch.

Advaible to be owner as of Slave is looking to give total control over to master as soon as possible.

Six months later (as we enter the middle third of the movie), after the duo have become bounty hunting partners, the pair finally set off in search of their main goal — rescuing Djagno's wife Broomhilda, a slaved played by Kerry Washington who has been sold to a nasty Mandingo baron and plantation owner Calvin Candie (played with delicious relish by Leonardo DiCaprio).

I know folks will want to look at DiCaprio's Calvin Candie as the villain, but in the end he's only as evil and devious as the times would suggest or allow; he was a slave owner who thought his slaves less than human.

The first opens on a dusty road on the eve of the Civil War, as the avuncular Dr. Schultz (Christoph Waltz) claims chain gang slave Django (Jamie Foxx) by violently disposing of his two owners (one of them is James Remar, who crops up later in the second of these three films in a different role).

Jamie Foxx as the slave who comes into his own, Kerry Washington as his lost wife Broomhilda, who works for DiCaprio's plantation owner and Mandingo purveyor Calvin Candie, and German bounty hunter Christoph Waltz are all excellent.

In 1860, as the American Experiment threatened to explode into a bloody civil war, there were as many as four hundred thousand slave - owners in the United States, and almost four million slaves.

Halle Berry stars as the title character, the daughter of a slave and a plantation owner.

While revenge narratives are often highly problematic in the way they represent certain aspects of society as deserving a violent death, Tarantino creates revenge narratives against characters that nobody in their right mind would sympathise with — Nazis in Inglourious Basterds and now sadistic slave owners in Django Unchained.

Jackson, buried under makeup and adopting an elderly stoop and geriatric traits, is outstanding in what must have been a challenging role as the «house nigger» - aside from a black slave owner, the most despised of roles for a black man in this era - and shows that he can be as ruthless as his master.

Solomon is soon re-named Platt and his story of twelve years of slavery and bondage under many slave owners is told as he thinks of ways to regain his freedom.