Not exact matches
Yet, thinkers from Edmund Burke to Russell Kirk have shown the deeply anti-conservative bases of the
social contract theory of Lockean (and Hobbesian) origin, one that is premised upon a conception of human beings
as naturally «free and independent,»
as autonomous individuals who are thought to exist by nature detached from a web of relationships that include family, community, Church, region, and so on.
The utilitarian interpretation stands, above all, under the archetype of the
social contract and is consonant with the modern
theory of natural rights
as derived from John Locke.
No matter how sophisticated, or at least complicated,
theories of
social contract may be, they are
as thoroughly made up
as nursery tales.
This notion,
as everyone knows, is called the
theory of «the
social contract.»
The former view, one that accepts the
social contract theory, leads to a hyper «individualism that, on the liberal side, fetishizes free speech and subscribes to a «do your own thing» morality, and, on the conservative side, is reflected in libertarian economics,
as in Margaret Thatcher's famous (or notorious?)
Whitehead repudiates the laissez - faire individualism of the Enlightenment.6 Whereas ancient societies failed to perceive man
as an individual,
social contract theory neglects man s essential sociality, which is more primal than his individuality:
contract presupposes custom.
Accordingly the state has entirely different moral obligations than an individual (see the SEP article on
social contract theory as well
as the «state» section of the article on Hegel).
The work concerns the structure of society and legitimate government, and is regarded
as one of the earliest and most influential examples of
social contract theory.
Kasper and I had actually first worked on a book about public art, and while we were working on all kinds of public art
theories, on the
social contract of art, we realized that,
as a matter of fact, there was still painting.