There are other types of impact sensors you will see «certified this, certified that» but many of them attach to the helmet making the NOCSAE warranty invalid as well
as some helmet manufacturer warranties.
Not exact matches
In theory, foreign
manufacturers could benefit from the tariff reductions
as follows — reducing the tariff on, say, baseball
helmets increases the demand for those
helmets.
There is still confusion about the recent position, or should I say positions, taken by NOCSAE over the past month, first deciding that the certification of any
helmet with a third - party add - on would be viewed
as automatically void, then, this past week, making a 180 - degree U-turn and leaving it up to the
helmet manufacturers to decide whether affixing impact sensors to the inside or outside of a
helmet voided the certification.
The sad reality,
as I explain in detail in my article, is that NOCSAE, by its own admission, is
as concerned with the liability of
helmet manufacturers as it is with player safety, not surprising given the super-heated legal environment in which they now operate.
I recognize that NOCSAE's decision may have some technical merit; and that it may be to some degree be necessary to protect the integrity of its
helmet standard by weeding out what one football
helmet representative characterized in an email to me
as «snake oil salesmen» marketing supplemental padding products that, despite their overblown claims, likely do little if anything to reduce, much less prevent, concussions, and may, at least in theory, compromise the ability of football
helmets to protect players
as the
manufacturers intended.
: Instead of automatically voiding the certification, NOCSAE decided it would leave it up to
helmet manufacturers to decide whether a particular third - party add - on affixed to the
helmet, such
as a impact sensor, voided its certification of compliance with NOCSAE's standard
A strict reading of that language would appear to allow a
helmet to which a third - party, after - market product has been affixed so long
as the alteration does not «decrease protection,» and so long
as the
helmet met the NOCSAE test standard at the time it left the
manufacturer.
As such, I recognize and appreciate that there are some in the concussion community, especially scientists - who by their very nature are appropriately cautious in endorsing any new technology without validation via rigorous, peer - reviewed testing - and some
helmet manufacturers who believe that impact sensor technology has not advanced sufficiently to warrant widespread use in contact and collision sports.
As someone who has been writing about and following the concussion issue for many years, and as the producer and director of the new high school football concussion documentary, «The Smartest Team: Making High School Football Safer», I have been in the unique position of having direct, first - hand experience with with all football helmets and helmet impact sensor technology, and of having addressed the issue of whether the addition of such sensors to a football helmet would likely void the NOCSAE certification and manufacturer's warrant
As someone who has been writing about and following the concussion issue for many years, and
as the producer and director of the new high school football concussion documentary, «The Smartest Team: Making High School Football Safer», I have been in the unique position of having direct, first - hand experience with with all football helmets and helmet impact sensor technology, and of having addressed the issue of whether the addition of such sensors to a football helmet would likely void the NOCSAE certification and manufacturer's warrant
as the producer and director of the new high school football concussion documentary, «The Smartest Team: Making High School Football Safer», I have been in the unique position of having direct, first - hand experience with with all football
helmets and
helmet impact sensor technology, and of having addressed the issue of whether the addition of such sensors to a football
helmet would likely void the NOCSAE certification and
manufacturer's warranty.
As such, I recognize and appreciate that there are some in the concussion community, especially scientists - who by their very nature are appropriately cautious in endorsing any new technology without validation via rigorous, peer - reviewed testing - as well as some of the helmet manufacturers themselves, who believe that impact sensor technology has not advanced sufficiently to warrant their widespread use in contact and collision sport
As such, I recognize and appreciate that there are some in the concussion community, especially scientists - who by their very nature are appropriately cautious in endorsing any new technology without validation via rigorous, peer - reviewed testing -
as well as some of the helmet manufacturers themselves, who believe that impact sensor technology has not advanced sufficiently to warrant their widespread use in contact and collision sport
as well
as some of the helmet manufacturers themselves, who believe that impact sensor technology has not advanced sufficiently to warrant their widespread use in contact and collision sport
as some of the
helmet manufacturers themselves, who believe that impact sensor technology has not advanced sufficiently to warrant their widespread use in contact and collision sports.
, and now allows companies which make add - on products for football
helmets to make their own certification of compliance with the NOCSAE standards on a
helmet model,
as long
as the certification is done according to NOCSAE standards, and
as long
as the
manufacturer assumes responsibility (in other words, potential legal liability) for the
helmet / add - on combination.
The long answer is that, it is true that the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) initially decided in July 2013 that modification of
helmets with third - party after - market add - ons, such
as impact sensors installed inside a
helmet or to its exterior, would be viewed
as voiding the
helmet manufacturer's certification, and that the certification could only be regained if the
helmet was retested by the
manufacturer with the add - on, NOCSAE later issued a press release clarifying that position: Instead of automatically voiding the certification, NOCSAE decided it would leave it up to
helmet manufacturers to decide whether a particular third - party add - on affixed to the
helmet, such
as a impact sensor, voided its certification of compliance with NOCSAE's standard, and now allows companies which make add - on products for football
helmets to make their own certification of compliance with the NOCSAE standards on a
helmet model,
as long
as the certification is done according to NOCSAE standards, and
as long
as the
manufacturer assumes responsibility (in other words, potential legal liability) for the
helmet / add - on combination.
Whether you have purchased a brand new hog right off the
manufacturer's line or you're cruising in your trusty»89 Honda along Connecticut's beautiful country roads, motorcycle insurance is just about
as important
as wearing a
helmet.
You and your children should always wear and use
helmets as recommended by the
manufacturer.
Rasansky Law firm is familiar with the different laws covering motorcycle accidents in Dallas, Texas, such
as helmet laws,
manufacturer recalls, highway traffic laws and other statutes relating to motorcycle crashes.
Helmet use has grown in recent years
as safety education has increased and
manufacturers produce lighter - weight
helmets.