Sentences with phrase «as some property owners determined»

Not exact matches

Finally, a new Illinois divorce law is recognizing that cat owners don't view their pets as property, but as family members, granting a judge the power to determine which party was the better pet parents and grant custody of the animal accordingly.

A lot of determining liability in a common slip and fall case depends on whether or not it is a business owner or a private property as well as whether or not the injured individual is a trespasser, invitee, or a business invitee.

Our Houston premises liability lawyers can skillfully determine who was responsible in your accident case by proving your legal status and whether the property owner met the reasonable standard care as required under Texas law.

As a starting point, you can educate yourself on factors the court will consider in order to determine whether the property owner is at fault.

The Court determined that the owners» refusal constituted a breach of section 117 of the Condominium Act, 1998 (the «Act») as the unremediated mould in the unit was likely to cause damage to property or cause injury to an individual.

With premises liability, the lawyer could go so far as to determine negligence in which they find that the property owner was well aware of the danger but invited the person onto the property without warning them of the danger.

Lawsuits claiming injuries as a result of some unsafe condition are dependent on determining what duty, if any, the property owner or occupier owed the injured individual.

To determine whether a property owner is responsible for an injury that occurred on his or her property, it's important to identify the victim as an invitee, a licensee, or a trespasser.

The panel determined that this form of communication does not harass a property owner, as would telephone calls or direct personal contacts.

If a constructive trust is imposed, the court will determine that the damaged party is in fact the owner of the property and that the party currently in possession is merely holding the property as trustee for the other party.

So long as the description allowed the broker to know which property the owner was offering to prospective buyers, the court determined that the description satisfied the requirements for a written brokerage agreement.

In an unreported decision, a California appellate court reversed an award made in favor of the former property owner because it determined that a commercial real estate broker was not responsible for property sale not closing, despite the fact the broker erroneously valued the property and also acted as an undisclosed dual agent.

Reiser, Inc. v. Roberts Real Estate (292 A.D. 2d 726)-- claims that broker breached listing agreement based on extrinsic evidence can not survive the explicit language of the listing agreement granting to broker «full discretion to determine the appropriate marking approach» for the listed properties; broker establishes its entitlement to commission under the listing agreements by introducing uncontroverted evidence that three properties sold as a result of broker's efforts while the listing agreements where in effect; owner's claims of breach of fiduciary duty fail where owner, builder / developer, did not list all of its properties with broker as broker's duty is limited to protecting its principal's interest only with respect to properties which have been listed with the broker; broker's duty to refrain from taking action adverse to its principal's interests is necessarily tied to the transaction that formed the agency relationship; owner's claim of fraud in the inducement under one of two listing agreements survives motion for summary judgment

Property is offered for lease on the following or other terms acceptable to Owner: a) Price as listed below (Owner is solely responsible for determining the appropriate listing price).

An exemption equal to the assessed value of the property to a person who has the legal or equitable title to real estate with a just value less than two hundred and fifty thousand dollars, as determined in the first tax year that the owner applies and is eligible for the exemption, and who has maintained thereon the permanent residence of the owner for not less than twenty - five years, who has attained age sixty - five, and whose household income does not exceed the income limitation prescribed in paragraph (1).