Sentences with phrase «as stadium wave»

Your finding that it manifests itself as a stadium wave is new and useful.

Not exact matches

The stadium filled with the screams of the innocent as the anti-clockwise wave overwhelmed and destroyed its clockwise rival.

Rather than undulating its entire body, Aegirocassis probably moved its lower flaps up and down in sequence, similar to the way a cuttlefish undulates its fleshy mantle (or sports fans repeatedly stand and sit as they «do the wave» in a stadium).

Those waves spread in somewhat the same way that a wave ripples through a baseball stadium as fans stand up and sit down in a coordinated fashion.

Much as I would welcome a cogent explanation for the widespread, but only spottily coherent, multi-decadal variations, Wyatt's «stadium wave» conjecture doesn't provide such.

A stern lesson from history Wyatt / Curry stadium waves require confirmation from analysis and computation; otherwise they risk being regarded as one more statistics - driven model, of which the climate literature already contains innumerably many... this large corpus of cycle - seeking pure - statistics climate models is (rightly) ignored by most scientists, due to the dismal track record of cycle - seeking science in regard to explanatory and predictive power.

Dr. Curry implies (as far as I understood it) The «stadium wave» hypothesis is based by interplay between North Atlantic Ocean temperatures oscillation (AMO) and the changes in the sea ice volumes in the Siberian Arctic Ocean region.

If the «pause» continues into the 2030s, as predicted by Wyatt / Curry, then the «stadium wave» hypothesis has been corroborated as a plausible explanation for (at least) a significant portion of the past warming and current slight cooling — and, while not falsifying AGW itself, it will most likely have falsified the IPCC hypothesis of CAGW (as outlined specifically in its AR4 and AR5 reports).

The stadium wave is an interesting idea especially as various waves starting at different times and combining sometimes into one, thereby amplifying the effect, is a reasonable analogy for why the effects could vary at times from limited to extreme.

So I would stadium - wave model is not entirely silent, as one simply needs to compared it, vs the the existing seal level record.

It could also be, as Wyatt and Curry have suggested, that this might not occur until the mid 2030s (or two decades from now), as a result of the described «stadium wave» phenomenon.

ii) The 60 year PDO Oscillation appears to be internal to the ocean system as the initial ENSO effects carry into the other ocean basins and then feed back to the Pacific by way of what you call a stadium wave but which I previously called he net interaction between the various ocean oscillations.

The stadium wave idea — an important idea in climate — defines a new way of understanding the interactions of physical sub-components in the evolution of a climate signal as it propagates through the network nodes over characteristic times.

As the paper says «We suggest that the stadium wave hypothesis holds promise in putting in perspective the numerous observations of climate behavior; offers potential attribution and predictive capacity; and that through use of its associated proxies, may facilitate investigation of past behavior that may better inform our view of future behavior.

The stadium wave is of immense significance — although as with the best science it describes what is abundantly obvious after the fact.

Is the «stadium wave» (personally I prefer to think of such geologic systems as Rube Goldberg mechanisms) strictly a Northern Hemisphere phenomenon?

Rather than «stadium wave» I would think that a mobile (as in kinetic art) would be a better analogy for a number of oscillators that oscillate individually and interact in such a way as to create a chaotic action.

The 60 - year pattern is definitely there, as Scafetta showed, but the stadium wave signal was weak in the SLR.

The stadium wave holds promise in putting into perspective numerous observations of climate behavior, such as regional patterns of decadal variability in drought and hurricane activity, the researchers say, but a complete understanding of past climate variability and projections of future climate change requires integrating the stadium - wave signal with external climate forcing from the sun, volcanoes and anthropogenic forcing.

In fact, I have already attempted that and my New Climate Model not only incorporates that «stadium» wave» as it works through the ocean basins but also places it within an overall climate change description.

And fear not, Vuc, as your solar variability and stadium wave is included and provides a small but distinguishable factor from the much larger CO2 control knob signal: http://contextearth.com/2013/12/18/csalt-model-and-the-hale-cycle/

As far as the parameters of the CSALT model are concerned — the value of CO2 can easily be extrapolated to 2016, the value of the stadium wave won't change much, and the TSI value can be projecteAs far as the parameters of the CSALT model are concerned — the value of CO2 can easily be extrapolated to 2016, the value of the stadium wave won't change much, and the TSI value can be projecteas the parameters of the CSALT model are concerned — the value of CO2 can easily be extrapolated to 2016, the value of the stadium wave won't change much, and the TSI value can be projected.

This would be some combination of warmings and coolings due to natural and / or human influences such as aerosols, instabilities in ocean currents, Length - Of - Day (LOD) fluctuations, the stadium wave (Wyatt and Curry), the 3M effect (me, December 17, Global Environmental Change section, this AGU Fall Meeting), etc. etc..

Did the editor use any of the authors of the stadium wave paper as reviewers?

As for the «sterling track records» of the other authors of the paper, even assuming them all this new paper does is raise valid questions regarding the «stadium wave».

In an actual stadium wave, the rules are something like: 1) stand up as the upward wave approaches you, 2) lift your arms as you rise, 3) hold your arms up as long as the people near you do, then 4) lower your arms and sit down.

The «stadium wave» as a partial systemic or meta explanation of the natural evoultion of climate affecting factors is an intersting, cogent and logical step to understanding this sort of thing — it might mot be right, but at least it's an attempt, even if it will take years or decades to determine if it's on the right track and what other factors need to be added / removed to make it an effective and usefully predictive tool.

IOW, while I regard the «stadium wave» approach as far superior to the «equilibrium with «external» forcing» approach based on obsolete «science», it's just a baby step in what I consider the right direction.

And as for «wishful thinking», I'm not especially enamored of the «stadium wave» hypothesis; IMO the regularity they seem to find is probably an artifact of the short period under study, while it's much more probable that actual fluctuations are much more «random».

In some way, that's the engine where all the other variations must be hanged (specially variations in albedo because of clouds - maybe connected with solar cycles as other authors are trying to prove -, variations in albedo because of sea ice extention, linked with the oceanic currents - as in the «stadium wave» that was presented by Curry and others, etc., variations in heat exchange between atmosphere and oceans, and so on.

OMG — could the stadium wave be right and we are looking at substantial temperature declines across much of the NH as the AO turns negative and AMOC declines?

I sure haven't read the paper, but I try to imagine what they could mean with a «stadium - wave» as anything physical in the atmosphere to be noticed.

I use a stadium wave component in my own model, scaled against the LOD changes that Dickey from JPL proposed as a temperature proxy.

As identified in the stadium wave analysis, the Atlantic Ocean is the driver, with the Pacific being the slave — the basins are linked as per the stadium wave argumentAs identified in the stadium wave analysis, the Atlantic Ocean is the driver, with the Pacific being the slave — the basins are linked as per the stadium wave argumentas per the stadium wave arguments.

As per stadium wave analysis, prior analogue periods to the current hiatus are ~ 1940 - 1976, and (1880)-- 1915.

As I said, the regimes you refer to have an amplitude of + / - 0.1 C, and correspond to the stadium wave.

Oh, then they didn't account for the log sensitivity to CO2 properly, and they didn't include the LOD variant of the stadium wave as a natural variation.

Aussie, That is an OWN GOAL as the LOD stadium wave peaks and valleys coincide with those times.

As Curry alludes to, the stadium wave hypothesis posits that there is a regular, propagating, approximately 60 - year oscillation in the climate system that, among other things, affects global temperatures.