Sentences with phrase «as subatomic»

Of course, the story doesn't end there, as Subatomic released Fieldrunners Attack!

Birch and Cobb maintain that the ecological model is more adequate than the mechanical model for explaining DNA, the cell, other biological subject matter (as well as subatomic physics), because it holds that living things behave as they do only in interaction with other things which constitute their environment (LL 83) and because «the constituent elements of the structure at each level (of an organism) operate in patterns of interconnectedness which are not mechanical» (LL 83).

Not exact matches

The entire universe was far too hot for subatomic paticles to form — everything existed as energy.

When physicists investigated the subatomic realm, however, they discovered that the principle of least action is just a limiting case of the much more subtle and sophisticated path integral principle, which is the basis of quantum mechanics, as Richard Feynman showed in the 1940s.

And yet, many decades later, quaternions were put to use to describe properties of subatomic particles such as the spin of electrons as well as the relation between neutrons and protons.

Since employing alternately the mathematics associated with particles and that associated with waves has led to a vast expansion of information about the subatomic world, many scientists have come to regard this new approach as satisfactory and adequate.

In itself this would have had minor philosophical consequences if the subatomic entities could be understood as smaller exemplars of the sorts of entities that physicists had been studying.

There is absolutely no evidence anywhere in the known univers, from the tiniest subatomic particle to the structure of the universe as a whole, that even remotely implies the faintest possibility thata deity exists.

At most simple levels of material synthesis, individual nodes of organization like subatomic particles are only determinate as functions within a bigger framework, so it is perhaps not surprising that their behaviour can only be expressed in terms of statistical probability.

While I can not develop the argument here, I believe it makes sense to understand unilateral power as a special case arising out of the more basic relational power, much as determinism arises statistically out of subatomic indeterminancy.

As such they would be instances of, rather than exceptions to, the very kind of experiential activity that occurs in all living things and, so process thinkers speculate, in all existents, even subatomic events.

At the subatomic level we may speak of tiny bits of mass and various forces (e.g., electromagnetism, gravity», the strong force), but Bergson is betting that insofar as these forces really» are forces, they are one force, and insofar as they» are composites of matter and élan vital they are energy.

She argues that it has been a serious mistake for interpreters of Whitehead «to limit the application of his basic ontological category of existence — his actual entity — to just two kinds of existents: subatomic entities, such as electrons, protons, photons...

The very notion of a «field», such as the Higgs field, is a mathematical and physical model describing the interrelationship of matter at the subatomic level, what Holloway would have called an «equational» relationship since in this vision (that espoused by Faith movement) the cosmos is a vast, ordered equation.

To talk about the leap from subatomic particles and probabilities to objects as we know them, and to talk about the leap from chemistry to consciousness, is in a very real sense to engage in metaphysics.

How do subatomic whatever - they - are acquire color and solidity and identity as a chair?

It is fundamental to the subatomic level as well as the human level.

As with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, there is an interconnectedness at the subatomic level that defies simple causal explanations from the macroscopic world.

Also, it seems more reasonable to think of these periodic events as aggregate events which are the outcome of coordinated activities of constituent occasions than to think of them as acts of single individuals (although Whitehead does identify subatomic pulses with single actual occasions).

think of god as an elusive subatomic particle they you have to look for... THEY NEVER STOP LOOKING FOR SUBATOMIC PARTICLES AND SUCH BUT THEY SURE WILL DISMISS GOD QUITE QUICKLY WITH NO SEARCHING Wsubatomic particle they you have to look for... THEY NEVER STOP LOOKING FOR SUBATOMIC PARTICLES AND SUCH BUT THEY SURE WILL DISMISS GOD QUITE QUICKLY WITH NO SEARCHING WSUBATOMIC PARTICLES AND SUCH BUT THEY SURE WILL DISMISS GOD QUITE QUICKLY WITH NO SEARCHING WONT THEY?

The analysis of the subatomic entities leads to quanta of energy that are much better described as energy - events than as substances.

If both human occasions of experience and subatomic events are best understood as syntheses of prehensions of other events, then their relation to one another is not as puzzling as has been supposed in the modern epoch.

Explaining Bohm's work, Timothy Ferris suggests that «the universe began as a hyperdimensional bubble of space, all but four of the dimensions of which compacted to form what we today call subatomic particles.

As for isness or is - notness, I find the universe too complex for that either / or; I'm not a fan of either / or either:) On a human - eye scale I'm mostly a human being; on a cellular level, I'm mostly water / liquid; on a subatomic level, I'm mostly vibrations; on a sub-sub particulate / vibrational level I'm mostly not there.

The usual answer is that the structure which Whitehead imputes to his functional feeling is «micrological» in character, i.e., that feeling, as the function of actual entities, belongs to an impalpable subatomic realm lying at the basis of things.

She argues that it has been a serious mistake for interpreters of Whitehead «to limit the application of his basic ontological category of existence — his actual entity — to just two kinds of existents: subatomic entities, such as electrons, protons, photons and the like, and human percipient experience.»

The implication of the new subatomic physics was that certainty was replaced by probability, or the notion of tendencies rather than absolutes: «we can never predict an atomic event with certainty; we can only predict the likelihood of its happening»... This directly contradicts the mechanistic model we explored above, and it implies that a subject such as normal birth needs to be looked at as a whole rather than its parts...»

Positron A subatomic particle with the same mass as an electron, but bearing a positive charge.

A major criticism of Russell's view of uncertainty as God's tool for shaping the world is that quantum events usually play out only on the subatomic level.

According to the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics (although «orthodox» seems an odd description for such a radical world view), subatomic entities such as electrons or photons are either waves or particles — depending on how the physicist chooses to observe them.

These are unstable subatomic particles similar to electrons but about 200 times as heavy.

Solar wind creates a huge magnetic bubble, known as the heliosphere, that protects Earth and the other planets from energetic subatomic particles that constantly zip around in deep space.

They probably use some of the terms he invented like [eigen] function and various things like that; and some of his mathematics, for example, the equation with regard as the central driving equation of quantum theory, which we call Schrödinger's equation, which governs the behavior of the subatomic matter.

The uniquely geometric nature of gravity has made it frustratingly difficult to contain within the same framework as the laws governing subatomic phenomena, namely quantum mechanics.

«The frontiers of fundamental physics have traditionally been studied with particle colliders, such as the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, by smashing together subatomic particles at great energies,» says UCSD physicist George Fuller, who collaborated with Paris and other staff scientists at Los Alamos to develop the novel theoretical model.

As you read this, physicists around the world are slamming millions of subatomic particles together at nearly the speed of light, creating conditions that mimic the universe shortly after the Big Bang.

Devised by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1925, it describes subatomic particles and how they may display wavelike properties such as interference.

As you rightly say there began two theories of quantum mechanics: The Schrödinger one, where you look at things like electrons, subatomic matter, in terms of waves, you look at their behavior in terms of waves.

As material in the disk falls toward the black hole, some of it forms dual jets that blast subatomic particles straight out of the disk in opposite directions at nearly the speed of light.

Known as cosmic rays, they have revolutionised our understanding of matter at the subatomic scale.

Using a metaphorical map as his guide and an imaginary boat as his vessel, he sets sail through subatomic waters.

Quantum mechanics govern the behavior of matter at the atomic and subatomic levels in exotic and counterintuitive ways as compared to the everyday world of classical physics.

Physicists can confirm that subatomic matter exists as both wave and particle by observing interference patterns, or overlapping waves.

With great precision, it describes all known matter — all the subatomic particles such as quarks and leptons — as well as the forces by which those particles interact with one another.

These machines accelerate subatomic particles, such as protons, to velocities exceedingly close to the speed of light.

Well, the magnetic field deflects particle storms and cosmic rays from the sun, as well as even more energetic subatomic particles from deep space.

Just as his earlier work paved the way to harnessing the smallest subatomic forces, the general theory opened up an understanding of the largest of all things, from the formative Big Bang of the universe to its mysterious black holes.

«Once the body dies, some part of our consciousness leaves us and travels to a new plane,» the scientist explains, evidenced by his machine that measures, as another character puts it, «brain wavelengths on a subatomic level leaving the body after death.»

For decades, physicists have sought the sources of the most energetic subatomic particles in the universe — cosmic rays that strike the atmosphere with as much energy as well - thrown baseballs.

If the result is correct, these ghostly subatomic particles, which fly through the Earth as if it were transparent, could be a major component of the mysterious dark matter that fills the Universe and which governs its ultimate fate.