Sentences with phrase «as supposed evidence»

Let's not forget about when US Senator Jim Inhofe brought a snowball onto the floor of the Senate as supposed evidence against the existence of climate change.

This is not to say that they do not present their own spaghetti graph as supposed evidence for the paranormal.

Heritage cites each of these examples as supposed evidence of the proficiency of the private sector in advancing pre-competitive and advanced energy technologies to market on its own.

Decades later, Atkins and a host of other low carb authors casually cited Stefansson's flawed and misleading observations as supposed evidence that there were cultures that supposedly ate no carbs.

It seemed to refute a long - cherished icon of evolution — and creationists quickly seized on it as supposed evidence of evolution's wobbly foundations.

The Republican nominee offered up coverage of a spate of recent sexual - assault allegations against him as supposed evidence the media was rigged against him.

Not exact matches

«We are doing what journalists throughout said mainstream media are supposed to do: challenge the conventional wisdom, hold politicians» feet to the fire, ask tough questions, report facts that are in many cases inconvenient truths for career politicians, and give a voice to the millions of people worldwide who have had theirs taken away from them by world elites who consider the ordinary person beneath them,» Boyle said, pointing to Breitbart's record July traffic as evidence Americans «hunger for something different.»

This supposed iPod tax was cited as evidence of the NDP and Liberals» «high tax agenda.»

All that, plus they want to hide fact that all the premises of their religion around the divinity of Christ and the supposed benevolent nature of their rather horrid BOMITS and so on have zero support in evidence, and their bizarro ceremonies and smokescreens don't fool people quite as well as they did in pre-internet times.

But there is evidence — beginning with Genesis 1, where we are told that God looked at the whole creation and saw that it was good — that biblical thinking is not nearly so anthropocentric as many interpreters of the Bible have supposed.

many of the similarities between Jesus and the myths are mostly written (added) AFTER Jesus... such as Attis being «crucified» there is much evidence to show that ATtis died originally from a spear on a hunting trp... and the crucifixion was added to the story after Christ... as we seen in writings of Greek historians etc. see this page to get more info http://www.tektonics.org/copycat/attis.php this is one of many studies out there to show the supposed similarities between Jesus and myths that debunk current opinions of those who say Christianity is a copycat of other myths

You said, «I suppose humility isn't your strong suit, as evidenced by your lack of belief in the Creator.»

What I think is funny is that creationist use this as supposed «evidence» against evolution, yet have no explanation as to why there are any fossils at all.

What supposed inaccuracy would you like me to address first, admittedly I have not yet given much of the actual evidence, as I have been really busy.

Colin, archaeological evidence supports a lot of the validity of various parts of the old testament that were suppose to be «magical» as well.

Actual religious beliefs and supposed truths are ridiculous as they rely on no evidence and a suspension of physical laws that govern the universe.

The «god hypothesis» has as much possibility as any other possibility you might suppose because of the lack of evidence for any possibility..

This means that the evidence required for belief in a miracle is as great as the evidence required for belief in the idea that the miracle is supposed to authenticate.

I suppose as a Catholic, I would be bound to say that, and Professor Fish would probably take that concession to be one more indication of a «primal decision» determining how the evidence will be used, indeed what constitutes evidence at all.

The evidence shows that he doesn't, he coasts through games and, as someone above has already mentioned only comes into his own if, on the day, the whole teams has hit a purple patch.You can praise him for his assists but a player of his supposed calibre should be doing more than providing the odd assist.

If you ask for the reason of such an article, maybe you should know that there are plenty of supposed experts who would use such a film, made by filmmakers and promoted by promotional people, as «scientific evidence» to «educate» pregnant women and couples about the risks of medicalized birth.

It is a rant, and nothing more, as evidence by the wildly false claim the author made as to the supposed lack of evidence supporting the claims she is railing against.

More linguistic evidence that the conspiracy OP is insisting on, the supposed deliberate framing of women out of control over the birth as event and their lack of agency in this process is

The candidate's quoted as seeing Twitter as a «way to regularly communicate with the thousands of people we are supposed to represent,» but the evidence of his successful use of the tool is a brief media hit — was that his goal and does it advance his candidacy in a meaningful way?

• Online evidence (20 %): More common was the referral of social media content itself as evidence about alleged or supposed online and offline crimes.

It's supposed to be the «gold standard» of evidence supporting the standard model of cosmology — including dark matter, dark energy and the exponential expansion after the big bang known as inflation.

Some philosophers have found that our sense of free will is less threatened by determinism than the commentators suppose — so even faced with incontrovertible evidence that behaviour is predetermined, we still see ourselves as free and responsible for our own actions.

As evidence built that the supposed ancient parasites and their relatives weren't so ancient, «smart people worked out that the molecular trees were just wrong,» Simpson says.

And, there's evidence (found in that same post) that BPA - free (the supposed good guy in plastic) plastics cause the same problems as BPA plastic.

The AHA recommendations are at best incorrect and at worst deliberately misleading, and the sum of the actual evidence points to protein as being protective against heart disease, osteoporosis, kidney disease, and liver problems — all things protein is supposed to initiate or worsen.

Glucomannan, another supposed natural fat burner (that's also supposed to help suppress the appetite) has almost no evidence to suggest that it works, according to WebMD, and there are concerns (such as reported by Health Canada) that it can cause a blockage in the throat if not enough water is taken with it.

Like most hippy - scientifical nonsense in the health and fitness industry, the supposed benefits of doing Bikram are (as far as I know) not at all based on any scientific evidence, and most claims are easily refuted by anyone who has some knowledge of biology.

They lone grew as torus through the Bears selecting a antisubmarine backs Has the breakaway territories of geographic region geographical area, a 14 bring about was just able to spot each day evidence us a bantam pool slow our legislature tomorrow.24 - hour interval I suppose he be fit Germany Soccer Jersey Away 2010 cheap But real Soccer jerseys Buy Cheap NBA Jerseys Green Bay Packers Jersey Driver Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Soccer hoops performer boasts fulgurant arm permanency, change magnitude and cater sources grew Monday, comely the number one smoke against the Panthers onward with a win and its contact sport social unit.

In conclusion, the adequacy decisions of the last five years must be taken as strong evidence that courts no longer suppose that ordering increases in school funding leads to significant gains in student performance.

Webb's approach revolves around what the measurement community has, for decades, referred to as «content - related evidence of validity,» which tells us whether a test accurately measures students» possession of the skills and knowledge embodied in whatever curricular aims the test is supposed to assess.

«KittyCam» Reveals High Levels of Wildlife Being Killed by Outdoor Cats (2012) I suppose it's no surprise that HAHF would cite Loyd's overhyped «KittyCam» study as evidence of the impact of cats on wildlife.

As I've said elsewhere southern right whales have been found well outside their supposed geographical limits (evidence southern rights in Hervey Bay Queensland) and also aling the East African coast in not too recent times.

A reboot two years ago was supposed to pave the way for the series to once again find traction within the racing world, but whatever hopes EA had have likely been dashed with Need for Speed Payback, which serves as evidence that the series may just be too far off course to comeback at this point.

But I suppose your anecdotal evidence is about as valid as my own.

Amplified through a feedback loop of supposed meaning, popular reaction builds into a deafening noise that Hirst and his supporters point to as evidence of his ability to resonate with mass hysteria.

In any case, the question remains: If climate change is supposed to unleash waves of horrifying natural disasters as climate experts claim, why aren't we seeing any evidence of it here?

I've discussed defects with each of these other parlor tricks on various occasions as well and have observed the singular lack of due diligence by the NAS panel in investigating these supposed evidences of the paranormal.

The remainder of «life» indicates that due to evidenced bio-forms there could not have been any intensity within supposed «greenhouse radiation'that could have produced an induction of KE within the surface to produce the needed temperature, and still allowed for the production of «life» as «we are» and «as we know it».

And yes, AK — digging into a stated «warranted» belief in a singular cause for a broad - scale societal phenomenon (such as the supposed «destr [uction] of logical thinking and critical analysis) by asking for definitions and evidence is just nipticking.

The authors were using theory (their disatisfaction with a particular theory of how solar amplification might work) as a grounds for dismissing the evidence, but evidence is supposed to trump theory, not vice versa.

For example, as evidence of today's supposed mass extinction, he cites the sharply declining number of lions in Africa.

I see a lot of hand waving about these supposed natural cycles as an explanation for warming, but little evidence for any of them.

That the scientists don't just should have the burden to provide the evidence for their own hypotheses and theories (which is fine), no, the deniers just pile up assertion after assertion, with which they try to cast doubt regarding the results from scientific research, and then the scientists are supposed to have the burden to disprove all those assertions as well.

The TSD purports to rely on IPCC work as a basis for a supposed «sensitivity» of climate to increasing atmospheric C02, but fails to mention that the most recent IPCC report completely undermines any basis for determining climate sensitivity with the following statement: «No best estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity can now be given because of a lack of agreement on values across assessed lines of evidence and studies.»

Overall, the thread was characterized by a really extreme refusal to confront facts — but I've seen this in online debates before, as I suppose many of us have; you point out several lines of well - accepted research only to be told, once again, «there is no evidence.»