Sentences with phrase «as supposed fact»

Not exact matches

As recently as 2012, the Times» former public editor was asking whether the paper's reporters were supposed to be «truth vigilantes» by fact - checking the statements of politicians during interviewAs recently as 2012, the Times» former public editor was asking whether the paper's reporters were supposed to be «truth vigilantes» by fact - checking the statements of politicians during interviewas 2012, the Times» former public editor was asking whether the paper's reporters were supposed to be «truth vigilantes» by fact - checking the statements of politicians during interviews.

«We are doing what journalists throughout said mainstream media are supposed to do: challenge the conventional wisdom, hold politicians» feet to the fire, ask tough questions, report facts that are in many cases inconvenient truths for career politicians, and give a voice to the millions of people worldwide who have had theirs taken away from them by world elites who consider the ordinary person beneath them,» Boyle said, pointing to Breitbart's record July traffic as evidence Americans «hunger for something different.»

In fact, what should be a celebratory coming - of - age moment for the Southeast Asian local champion is threatening to become nightmarish thanks to persistent regulators, panicky Uber staff and reluctant drivers who are supposed to switch to Grab as part of the arrangement.

It's owing to such guarantees — that is, to the fact that bank deposits are, or are supposed to be, readily redeemable in central bank notes — that bank deposits usually command the same value as the «money proper» for which they're a stand - in.

The detractors have heralded the lack of definitive policy platforms by Kenney as a weakness when in fact it is exactly how Grassroots involvement is supposed to work.

In fact, Mr. Paulson may be guilty of deliberate scuttling of the public interest that, as Treasury Secretary, he is supposed to defend.

All that, plus they want to hide fact that all the premises of their religion around the divinity of Christ and the supposed benevolent nature of their rather horrid BOMITS and so on have zero support in evidence, and their bizarro ceremonies and smokescreens don't fool people quite as well as they did in pre-internet times.

I suppose, as sad as it is, a way to prove that there is a god is through the fact that demonic possessions are real.

Considering that story wasnt even created until a few hundred years after the supposed «ressurection», and the fact that the story exists only in your fable book (also compiled, and edited hundreds of years later), I do nt think claiming it to be true is the same as, you know, being true.

Seems like an obvious contradiction to me; something that's only supposed to work as an apologetic against problems with the prevailing God model while, in fact, it works equally well against all the positive aspects of that same model.

That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll

After experiencing abuse as a leader in my ex-church, I struggled with the fact that many long - term relationships were completely destroyed and that we (as christians who were supposed to have a better way to live!)

So much for Gopnik's argument that Chesterton's «national spirit» and «extreme localism» led him to his supposed anti-Semitism: they were, in fact, precisely what gave him his respect for other nations and other cultures, including that of the Jews, to which the world owed its knowledge of God, «as narrow as the universe».

Statements affirming particular facts may be found to have value as pictorial expressions of spiritual truths, even though the supposed facts themselves did not actually happen.

he or she would go into slavery, and it was not an evil thing as you suppose, in fact as was the custom he or she could remain in slavery by having his ear awled to the doorway.

But I suppose she's uesd to cliaming the unprovable as fact.

That said, the case has been made that if the Christian god exists, then «God should be detectable by scientific means simply by virtue of the fact that he is supposed to play such a central role in the operation of the universe and the lives of humans», with the conclusion that» [e] xisting scientific models contain no place where God is included as an ingredient in order to describe observations.»

In fact, in spite of his insisting that most actual occasions are unconscious (and that there is much that is unconscious even in that series of actual occasions which constitute our successive mental states), his talk of their experience or feeling of themselves, the influence of their predecessors, and their subjective immediacy seems pointless unless each of them is supposed to feel its own being, in some genuine sense, however dimly, so that there is a truth as to what - it - is - like - being - it.

Indeed, most cultures in human history have generated no such marvel as the modern scientific movement, and even in our own culture, scientifically oriented as it is supposed to be, most people accept the benefits of technology and use the vocabulary of science but do not in fact choose to abide by the disciplines that alone make scientific productivity possible.

I guess we are supposed to forget the fact that Christianity and thr bible are just a bunch of stolen, rehashed versions of ancient civilizations such as Sumerian, Babylonian, Egyptian, etc..

But, no matter what your opinion is on actual marijuana usage, the fact that the DEA is open to revisiting a legal classification that many view as deeply flawed could be a sign that government officials are finally going to fix laws that have had serious affects on the society it is supposed to be serving and protecting.

Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever; Man will always have a battle between flesh and spirit; he is more flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot of modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do... old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls of those under his leadership; He must answer and atone to God for those actions, you think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we need to change.

Suppose the temporal order is not understood as it pictures itself, but rather as the recognizable fact that it is in reality.

The fact that there is a word for «rope» which is almost the same as the word for «camel» has tempted interpreters to suppose that Jesus spoke here of a rope, but to thread a needle with a rope is still impossible.

But that interpretation is unacceptable even as an interpretation of Paul's mind, because it runs counter to other texts, several of which I have quoted above, in which Paul evidently supposes that some are in fact lost.

Indeed, it has been supposed by some that the teraphim, household gods, (Genesis 35:4; 31:19; 30 - 35; I Samuel 15:23; 19:13, 16; II Kings 23:24) were originally images of ancestors; that they were honored as such and were part of the apparatus of popular religion; (Hosea 3:4) that mortuary customs which the prophetic school later condemned grew up around them; (Cf. Deuteronomy 26:13 - 14) that the right of performing the necessary ceremonies for one's ancestors devolved upon a son and that this fact underlay both the sense of tragedy in being sonless and the practices of levirate marriage and of adoption to avoid such disaster; (Cf. Genesis 15:2 - 3; 30:3 - 8; Deuteronomy 25:5 - 10) and that this set of ideas and customs was an integral part of the whole clan organization of early Israel.

As James characterized this approach: «A fact and a theory have not different natures, as is usually supposed, the one being objective, the other subjectivAs James characterized this approach: «A fact and a theory have not different natures, as is usually supposed, the one being objective, the other subjectivas is usually supposed, the one being objective, the other subjective.

I am having difficulty in understanding what the Latin Church would say to these positions, if in fact they are in disagreement as is supposed by these authors.

Suppose that for some reason the chemical doctrine had been highly prized throughout some district as the foundation of its social order — would it have been wise, would it have been candid, would it have been moral, to forbid the disclosure of the fact that the experiments produced discordant results?

The article isn't supposed to be a huge American circle jerk, it's supposed to cast a light on the fact that as broad minded as we want to believe we are, there are still obviously problems.

Here, in a strange fashion, the original fusion of supposed fact and faith - image, after an interim period of being dismissed by the religious mind as purely symbolic and crudely so, becomes in our day once again the vivid symbol for a faith - interpretation of literal fact.

It's like Fox is just having writers write on something as opinion instead of ascertaining facts, getting in depth facts, reporting facts... tainted and with a ludicrous taint that Americans are just supposed to read and not be active in their communties... that all these foreigners are just supposed to be able to come here, sue and costs us money, not get along and that we are just supposed to do what the governement says... while these foreigners change everything weith the help of people like Obama... Fox would do well to keep their forums.

Suppose we added just one additional clarification, namely that this text in fact refers to the events of Jesus» execution, to what actually took place as it is described in the Gospels.

Just as we sometimes fail to recognize how dependent we actually are upon the historical revelation, falsely supposing that our knowledge of God has been derived entirely or largely from nature and reason, so also often, having accepted the fact of revelation, we think of it as having been made directly to us as individuals and thus regard ourselves as being at every essential point independent of the community.

One is that if we wish to come as close as possible to historical fact, we shall not do it by supposing that the faith of the first Christians was based on imposture and fraud.

Love God doesn't include hate Jews in fact your supposed to «love thy neighbor as thy self - or better yet «do unt others as you would have done to you.»

One thing is for sure: If this act of terrorism was supposed to divide the people of London, I know for a fact that all something like this does is bring them closer together as one.

I suppose this wouldn't be a huge problem except for the fact that I live in the Pacific Northwest and make it a point to eat locally as much as possible.

whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch

In fact, Wilson was supposed to warm the bench as a rookie with free - agent acquisition Matt Flynn the expected starter.

He acts as if things happen quite independent of the fact he is SUPPOSED to be a coach with coaching skills.

In fact, we actually played as they supposed expected.

The fact that DO has not had to save the team single - handedly is really more of a compliment to the defence than an indictment of him — I suppose as Gooners we should not worry too much if these heroics are not called upon for some time yet.

The fact that it is Merson with these negative comments about the Chilean's potential state of mind should come as no surprise I suppose, because he has not had many nice things to say about his old club in recent years.

Of course they're going to resist change, and pretend, as an organization, that the process is essentially perfect, and in fact could be improved only by a) fewer grenades thrown by impudent non - members / non-voters like me, and b) the dissolution of the Veterans Committee, which after all was invented largely to redress any (supposed) errors made by the BBWAA.

As a matter of fact, Wilshere injury was a «blessing» as that deluded manager of ours put in his mind that he was to become our new «chef d'orchestre» when he clearly does not have the quality and the skills (15 games as a number 10 and we won only 5... This is where we lost the league if we were supposed to win iAs a matter of fact, Wilshere injury was a «blessing» as that deluded manager of ours put in his mind that he was to become our new «chef d'orchestre» when he clearly does not have the quality and the skills (15 games as a number 10 and we won only 5... This is where we lost the league if we were supposed to win ias that deluded manager of ours put in his mind that he was to become our new «chef d'orchestre» when he clearly does not have the quality and the skills (15 games as a number 10 and we won only 5... This is where we lost the league if we were supposed to win ias a number 10 and we won only 5... This is where we lost the league if we were supposed to win it.

But though we still love arsenal some things about this club baffle me a lot the way peeps live their lives in denial.There are some players who are not supposed to be starting and should have been sold but some way somehow they still get game time.Its like continuing to make the same mistakes and expect to progress in life.It is a fact that this club will not move forward until it learns from its mistakes as that is the right way in life.What a shame one wonders when all this will stop.We need to renew our mind for a change.The mentality in the club is terrible but i know who will save us.

there is some suggestion that wenger is backtracking on his fervent stance regarding what players would be staying at the club for the remainder of the season... some might deduce that this is all part of a much bigger, more elaborate plan... by shifting the blame wenger is attempting to, not so slyly, flip the narrative... by doing so he hopes to evoke empathy from his most ardent supporters, while attempting to rally any fence - sitters, whose faith was waning unless a more legitimate agent of blame emerges... unfortunately, and incredibly insulting to the fans, when wenger attempts to spin a tale and / or tries to eat his own words, he doesn't seem to play it all the way through in his head, so invariably gaping holes emerge... say we believed his version of the truth, would that not make him either an incredibly well - paid custodian of destruction or a spineless jellyfish because what manager worth his weight in salt would stay at a club that didn't give him final say after 20 years of supposed «success»... no matter the answer, neither bodes well for us... how ironic, in a way, since many pundits claim this team has lacked a «spine» for some years now... so whether we win, lose or draw on Sunday is frankly immaterial, as the problems will remain, and although it will be easier to digest if we left the Pool with 3 points, it might just be the worst result for the betterment of this club... a fact that both breaks my heart and baffles the mind

The bottom - line is the move from the Highbury was based on lies, it's clear to see that what was supposed to be a necessary evil to compete at the highest levels, was in fact an elaborate ruse concocted by the filthy rich as a means to increase their wealth at our expense.

Andres S I can't fault a word you have said.He made that change at half time that changed the shape just enough to get the job done and you have to acknowledge the team responding.This now leads us to the fact we have ANOTHER Wembley date that 90 other teams wish they had despite it being labelled a Mickey Mouse tournament.Win it and we have Europa Cup minimum next season (correct me if I'm wrong here) and that will keep him in the job next season no matter how much we recognise and want change.I suppose all the AKB's will be swinging from the chandeliers (note - that was for you JW) at what we still feel will be an under achievement but they would rejoice at us winning the Emirates Cup they are so blinkered.Yes he got the job done last night but let's not be fooled he is the manager that can take us forward.In spite of that we will all ba at Wembley and as we all know we NEVER LOSE there.