Hugo McCloud (b1980, Palo Alto, California) is known for his large - scale abstract paintings that use materials such
as tar paper and metal, and engage with traditional woodblock printing techniques.
Not exact matches
It was
as if someone had slapped a piece of
tar paper onto an open phone book and ripped out a page, says nano researcher Philip Collins of the University of California, Irvine.
After layering
tar paper,
tar, foil sheets, and aluminum paint to make a «malleable canvas,»
as McCloud puts it, he then heats the surface with a blowtorch and hammers decorative patterns into it using a woodblock.
That
paper explains and assesses the IPCC SRES «scenarios»
as they are described in Chapter 2 of WG3 in the IPCC Third Assessment Report (the
TAR published in 2001): that chapter describes the origin and nature of the «scenarios».
Nowhere in the
paper is any justification given
as to why radiative transfer models give values for radiative forcing
as defined in Chaper 6 of the
TAR.
Quite simply, I have accused Michael Mann of committing fraud with his Hockey Stick
papers and actions
as a lead author of the IPCC
TAR to promote his own conclusions.
This thread is not because of these (4 or 5)
papers, it is over whatever Mann did or did not do
as lead author of chapter 2 of
TAR.
As I said in my previous post, that paper explains and assesses the IPCC SRES «scenarios» as they are described in Chapter 2 of WG3 in the IPCC Third Assessment Report (the TAR published in 2001): that chapter describes the origin and nature of the «scenarios»
As I said in my previous post, that
paper explains and assesses the IPCC SRES «scenarios»
as they are described in Chapter 2 of WG3 in the IPCC Third Assessment Report (the TAR published in 2001): that chapter describes the origin and nature of the «scenarios»
as they are described in Chapter 2 of WG3 in the IPCC Third Assessment Report (the
TAR published in 2001): that chapter describes the origin and nature of the «scenarios».
I said in that post: «That
paper explains and assesses the IPCC SRES «scenarios»
as they are described in Chapter 2 of WG3 in the IPCC Third Assessment Report (the
TAR published in 2001): that chapter describes the origin and nature of the «scenarios».
It currently takes
as many
as 3.1 barrels of water to produce one barrel of crude oil from the Alberta
tar sands, according to the
paper.