Her piece on «The Price of Education» revealed how fragile school funding is in California, particularly
as teacher retirement costs rise amid econ...
Not exact matches
According to Fitzpatrick and Lovenheim: «Early
retirement incentives (ERIs) are increasingly prevalent in education
as districts seek to close budget gaps by replacing expensive experienced
teachers with lower -
cost newer
teachers.
These CB plans offer entering
teachers the same expected
retirement compensation
as existing plans, with the same expected
cost for taxpayers.
Couple this with various features of the plans themselves — for instance, early
retirement provisions allowing
teachers to retire in their early - to - mid 50s, unrealistic assumptions about investment returns, and
cost - of - living adjustments not tied to any inflation index such
as the Consumer Price Index — and you have a system that carries a hefty price tag.
In fact, the opposite is true, they argue: States depend on the constant turnover to keep pension
costs down, and pension rules are often to blame for pushing out the most veteran
teachers as soon
as they reach
retirement age.
It's not just that states and districts failed to save up for pensions they knew would come due, it's that they offered literally the cushiest pensions available to
teachers, notes a 2016 study: «
as a group, [
teachers] have by far the highest
retirement costs, even compared with other public - sector employees.
Charters that provide this
retirement benefit cite
cost and a wider range of investment options for
teachers as their top reasons to opt - out of the state
teacher pension fund.
Given the idiosyncratic incentives embedded in its current
retirement plan — and because it imposes mobility
costs on mobile
teachers — the state should at least offer a defined contribution (DC) plan
as a choice for its employees.
Meanwhile year - long exposes by newspapers such
as the Sacramento Bee into the high
cost of so - called pension spiking, or the practice of allowing
teachers and bureaucrats nearing
retirement to get double - digit pay raises in their final years of work in order to gain even fatter pensions, has also led to a state investigation, once again reminding families that they pay the price for 3,090
teachers (
as of 2010) getting more than $ 100,000 annually in pension annuities.
Early
retirement incentives (ERIs) are increasingly prevalent in education
as districts seek to close budget gaps by replacing expensive experienced
teachers with lower -
cost newer
teachers.
In Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Federation of
Teachers president Jerry Jordan has long railed against using 401 (k)
retirement plans for his union's members
as a way to curb skyrocketing pension
costs.
In fact, switching new
teachers to a new type of
retirement plan, such
as a defined - contribution plan, can be
cost neutral.
As we showed last year,
teachers have higher
retirement costs than any other major group of workers, even other public - sector employees.