Sentences with phrase «as testimony in court»

Your depositions — formal statements, either oral or written, that carry the same importance as testimony in court — play a different role in a Virginia divorce, depending on whether the divorce is contested or not.

In addition, George Papadopoulos, a foreign policy advisor to the Trump campaign, made misleading statements to FBI investigators, which is also illegal - statements made to FBI investigators are essentially the same as testimony in court, with the same penalties for not being honest.

Not exact matches

As it turned out, 18 minutes of sworn testimony from Redstone, presented in court Friday, was all it took to resolve the case — but not in Herzer's favor.

(Chicago constructed this story from thousands of pages of federal court records, police reports, and court testimony from related cases, as well as from official government reports and dozens of interviews with federal and local law enforcement officials and attorneys for some of the defendants; through a spokesman, prosecutors in the Zambada case declined comment.)

When witnesses to an event have given their testimony and been cross-examined — even repeatedly and in all courts of appeal — their role as witnesses is played out.

In that culuture, you would appear to men, as women's testimony wouldn't even hold in courIn that culuture, you would appear to men, as women's testimony wouldn't even hold in courin court.

The jury must determine whether the facts of the case as established by testimony in court fit the legal definition of the offense with which the defendant is charged — a definition likely to be complicated at best, incomprehensible at worst.

Kane acted after Superior Court Judge Eugene Kelly, who has been sitting and will continue to sit in Hartford as a special one - man grand jury, heard testimony on widespread corruption in the sport.

Sometimes, her testimony seemed to aid the defense, like when she smiled as she identified Percoco in court and when she agreed that Percoco would protect Cuomo from political adversaries and hecklers at events.

Richmond Ayayi, the interdicted CID / Investigator who investigated into the case, finds himself in a very tight corner — as he continues to give contradictory testimony of what he told or tells the court and what the complainant in the case, Asamoah Gyan's manager, Samuel Anim Addo, told the court.

The councillors» counsel, Zi, in his reaction to the judgement, described the stance of the appeal court justices as «very satisfactory and a further testimony to the fact that there was hope for the common man».

For his part, Fitzpatrick doesn't seem interested in actually retiring yet: he spoke briefly as he was leaving court during the second day of testimony in a 33 - year - old cold case trial.

The testimony in Nassau County matrimonial court was part of a hearing to determine whether the former senator will keep temporary custody of the couple's two children, ages 7 and 9, as the D'Amatos go through a divorce.

In another case, an Erie County court judge described an officer's testimony as «inventive.»

Todd Howe, center, exits court on Monday after his first day of testimony as a government witness in the corruption case against Joseph Percoco and three other defendants.

«In the face of such orders and the ethical dilemmas to which they give rise, medical professionals likely would decline to serve as expert witnesses in lethal injection cases in the first place, robbing the parties and the courts of appropriate expert testimony that would assist them in accurately adjudicating the important constitutional issues this and similar cases present,» the authors write in the brieIn the face of such orders and the ethical dilemmas to which they give rise, medical professionals likely would decline to serve as expert witnesses in lethal injection cases in the first place, robbing the parties and the courts of appropriate expert testimony that would assist them in accurately adjudicating the important constitutional issues this and similar cases present,» the authors write in the briein lethal injection cases in the first place, robbing the parties and the courts of appropriate expert testimony that would assist them in accurately adjudicating the important constitutional issues this and similar cases present,» the authors write in the briein the first place, robbing the parties and the courts of appropriate expert testimony that would assist them in accurately adjudicating the important constitutional issues this and similar cases present,» the authors write in the briein accurately adjudicating the important constitutional issues this and similar cases present,» the authors write in the briein the brief.

Reese Witherspoon mugs it up shamelessly as Cooper, a hapless, pint - sized Texan police officer assigned to escort a Mexican mobster's wife to a court case in Dallas where she and her husband will give testimony against a notorious drug lord.

Crawford sits there in court, sketching in his legal pad, as damning testimony is presented, not even taking advantage when the judge recommends he object to one of Beachum's leading questions.

Consistent with NSBA's position as outlined in its «friend of the court» (amicus) brief, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the Court's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.&rcourt» (amicus) brief, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the Court's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.&rCourt's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.&rcourt substitute for trial testimony.»

As per my last post about the second day in court in Santa Fe, New Mexico, I was purposefully ambiguous about one of the two articles written in The Santa Fe New Mexican regarding my testimony.

David's initiative seeks many of the same objectives as Vergara v. California, the state's most significant teacher rights case in two decades, which recently concluded the testimony phase in California State Superior Court.

Recalling testimony from Harvard economist Raj Chetty, he told the court that if as few as 3 percent of California teachers were ineffective, the academic impact on their students would be the equivalent of $ 11.6 billion in lost lifetime earnings.

Witnesses in court will usually tell what they see or remember as the truth — but how many innocent people have been convicted based on the testimony of a sincere and objective bystander who is, unwittingly, mistaken?

As per the assignment writing team of psychology experts, the forensic psychologists perform child custody evaluations, provide testimony in court cases, assess the mental competency of criminal suspects, and testify criminal cases.

As for her specific testimony, the court does not find it comports with other evidence in the record which shows that a change in share class can be accomplished in substantially less time and with the testimony of Dr. Witz that such a change could occur in a day.

As a result, many of the credit bureaus» dispute practices remained an industry secret, apart from snippets that were revealed in court cases and through congressional testimony, and the bureaus largely escaped serious regulatory scrutiny.

As a work of conceptual writing, Allen's book is squarely in line with the repurposed court documents of Vanessa Place and even bears a distant resemblance to Reznikoff's Testimony.

It's likely that courts will be seeing more of this Dr. Upton in the next couple of years, as he testifies on his actual area of expertise, agreeing that wind turbines will not cause epileptics any problems, but then proceeds to submit unsupported testimony in unfamiliar areas.

The court observed that although prosecutors did not produce additional evidence or testimony regarding the «import of these items, the State explicitly sought in both opening and closing to link these items with the so - called «gothic lifestyle» and to characterize them as evidence of «satanic influences.»»

In addition, in a separate holding that could deter police in the future from acting like K - 9 sniffer dogs, the court found that the officer's testimony that he sniffed alcohol on Koch's breath was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain a convictioIn addition, in a separate holding that could deter police in the future from acting like K - 9 sniffer dogs, the court found that the officer's testimony that he sniffed alcohol on Koch's breath was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain a convictioin a separate holding that could deter police in the future from acting like K - 9 sniffer dogs, the court found that the officer's testimony that he sniffed alcohol on Koch's breath was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain a convictioin the future from acting like K - 9 sniffer dogs, the court found that the officer's testimony that he sniffed alcohol on Koch's breath was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain a conviction:

It transfers Davis» habeas corpus petition to the U.S. District Court in Georgia and instructs the court to «receive testimony and make findings of fact as to whether evidence that could not have been obtained at the time of trial clearly establishes petitioner's innocence.&rCourt in Georgia and instructs the court to «receive testimony and make findings of fact as to whether evidence that could not have been obtained at the time of trial clearly establishes petitioner's innocence.&rcourt to «receive testimony and make findings of fact as to whether evidence that could not have been obtained at the time of trial clearly establishes petitioner's innocence.»

As noted today by Scott Greenfield on his Twitter feed, a recent marijuana case in federal court in Illinois turned on the testimony of Richard L. Doty, Ph.D., who was permitted to testify as a marijuana odor experAs noted today by Scott Greenfield on his Twitter feed, a recent marijuana case in federal court in Illinois turned on the testimony of Richard L. Doty, Ph.D., who was permitted to testify as a marijuana odor experas a marijuana odor expert.

As to whether the trial court, applying its discretion, should allow or disallow a new expert witness in the refiled case, the criteria are: surprise, prejudice, the nature of the testimony, the diligence of the adverse party, the timeliness of the objection and the good faith of the party seeking to add the new witness.

Ellacott had been properly sentenced even though the Superior Court Justice had erred when he used Ellacott's testimony and his denial of guilt as aggravating factors in his decision.

The appellate court also upheld the testimony of the Conde Nast employee over wife's objection, as the employee had first hand knowledge of the terms and basis for the stock purchase agreement in her position at the company.

Mr. Morley has submitted evidence as an expert in courts in the United States, Canada and Australia, in the form of testimony, affidavits or affirmations, as to such international family law matters as:

In the absence of expert testimony, there was no triable issue of material fact as to whether a defect in the speed control deactivation switch installed on a pickup truck was the proximate cause of a fire that damaged a brake shop, a federal court in Mississippi ruled, granting the pickup truck maker's motions for summary judgment on the business owner's products liability and negligence claims (the latter of which was subsumed by the products liability claim), and on the punitive damages claim (Mildemont, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., January 13, 2017, Ozerden, H.In the absence of expert testimony, there was no triable issue of material fact as to whether a defect in the speed control deactivation switch installed on a pickup truck was the proximate cause of a fire that damaged a brake shop, a federal court in Mississippi ruled, granting the pickup truck maker's motions for summary judgment on the business owner's products liability and negligence claims (the latter of which was subsumed by the products liability claim), and on the punitive damages claim (Mildemont, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., January 13, 2017, Ozerden, H.in the speed control deactivation switch installed on a pickup truck was the proximate cause of a fire that damaged a brake shop, a federal court in Mississippi ruled, granting the pickup truck maker's motions for summary judgment on the business owner's products liability and negligence claims (the latter of which was subsumed by the products liability claim), and on the punitive damages claim (Mildemont, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., January 13, 2017, Ozerden, H.in Mississippi ruled, granting the pickup truck maker's motions for summary judgment on the business owner's products liability and negligence claims (the latter of which was subsumed by the products liability claim), and on the punitive damages claim (Mildemont, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., January 13, 2017, Ozerden, H.).

Witnesses are given the necessary preparation to give effective testimony in support of the Release Plan, as well as necessary notice and preparation about the atmosphere and procedures of bail court which is often crowded and fast moving.

While the legal profession wrangles over the relatively minor issue of allowing testimony by Skype and other technologies, there are those that are looking at resolving millions of disputes in ways that are arguably better, faster and cheaper as compared to traditional courts.

As any trial lawyer will tell you, getting expert testimony admitted has been tougher since 1993, when the Supreme Court decided in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals that scientific testimony must be not only relevant, but reliable.

Whenever authorized by the Judge, automatic voice recognition and transcription of testimonies in his laptop: as witnesses (or anyone for that matter) is speaking in the court room, testimonies and verbal exchanges are automatically transcribed into text;

Today, the Supreme Court decided to let lower courts decide the admissibility of testimony by employees other than the plaintiff regarding workplace discrimination, also known as «me too» evidence, in discrimination cases.

As discussed in that post, prosecutors are likely to introduce counselor testimony in hopes of circumventing our Supreme Court's holding in State v. Kromah, 401 S.C. 340, 737 S.E. 2d 490 (2013).

More specifically, the trial court might well have proscribed extrajudicial statements by any lawyer, party, witness, or court official which divulged prejudicial matters, such as the refusal of Sheppard to submit to interrogation or take any lie detector tests; any statement made by Sheppard to officials; the identity of prospective witnesses or their probable testimony; any belief in guilt or innocence; or like statements concerning the merits of the case.

In other words, it is likely that courts will rely upon this provision, as well as article 279 (hearing witnesses at a distance), to allow testimony by video - conference and other such things.

It provides an overview of the essential role that treating and expert practitioners play in the lawsuit, tips on how treating practitioners can avoid hurting their patient's case, details about «experts» and their duties, guidelines for preparing medical - legal reports, as well as tips to provide effective expert testimony in court.

«In fact, ASCLD / LAB could more properly be described as a product service organization,» Schechter wrote, «which sells for a fee a «seal of approval» covering diverse laboratory systems, which laboratories can utilize to bolster their credibility through in - court testimony by technicians, plus ancillary services such as protection from outside inquiry, shielding of internal activities and, where necessary, especially in the event of public condemnation, a spokesperson to buffer the laboratory from media inquiry.&raquIn fact, ASCLD / LAB could more properly be described as a product service organization,» Schechter wrote, «which sells for a fee a «seal of approval» covering diverse laboratory systems, which laboratories can utilize to bolster their credibility through in - court testimony by technicians, plus ancillary services such as protection from outside inquiry, shielding of internal activities and, where necessary, especially in the event of public condemnation, a spokesperson to buffer the laboratory from media inquiry.&raquin - court testimony by technicians, plus ancillary services such as protection from outside inquiry, shielding of internal activities and, where necessary, especially in the event of public condemnation, a spokesperson to buffer the laboratory from media inquiry.&raquin the event of public condemnation, a spokesperson to buffer the laboratory from media inquiry.»

In Smuk, McFarlane J.A. stated at paragraph three: When a witness, whether an accused or not, sits in court and hears the testimony of another witness on a subject matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conforIn Smuk, McFarlane J.A. stated at paragraph three: When a witness, whether an accused or not, sits in court and hears the testimony of another witness on a subject matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conforin court and hears the testimony of another witness on a subject matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conform.

When a witness sits in a Court and hears the testimony of another witness or other witnesses on a subject - matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conform, but that is a factor to be considered by the tribunal of fact and relates to the weight of the evidence.

The Court found that the evidence of Worme against Campeau met the criteria of necessity and reliability under the principled exception in Khelawon (Campeau at para 14) as the testimony was not obtained by abusive police conduct.