Sentences with phrase «as the heat sink at»

Finally, while both bulbs are a little on the large side, as the heat sink at the base is a bit elongated, they should fit fine in most fixtures.

Not exact matches

Manufacturer Options are as follows; 400HP Cummins Engine, Message / Heated Drivers and Passengers Seat, Radiant Floor Heating Galley and Bath, Light Cherry Wood Cabinetry, Elliptical Ceiling Treatment, Residential Refer, Travel Information Center, 37» LCD Front TV, 32» LCD Rear TV, Stacked Washer and Dryer, Advantium Oven, King Size Bed, 72 «W X 77 «L, 3rd Roof Air Conditioner with 10K Onan Generator, 8D AGM House Batteries, Tire Monitoring System, 3M Nose Coat, (2) Dual Directional Slide Trays in Basement, Solid Surface Vanity Sinks, Front Sunscreen's, Stained Glass Insert in China Cabinet, Safe, Tile Upgrade, We store our coach at Placer RV Storage, please contact Scott there for an appointment to see it in person at 916-899-8326.

As the sun sinks toward the ocean, heat up the barbecue for dinner at the al - fresco table, gather around the firepit or soak in the hot tub.

As the sun sinks toward the neighboring island of Molokai, heat up the barbecue, sample local seafood at the al - fresco dining area and try to stay awake for some stargazing — Hawaii is, after all, the world's most remote island chain.

(PS regarding Venus — as I have understood it, a runaway water vapor feedback would have occured when solar heating increasing to become greater than a limiting OLR value (Simpson - Kombayashi - Ingersoll limit — see http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/climate-feedbacks-part-1/ — although I should add that at more «moderate» temperatures (warmer than today), stratospheric H2O increases to a point where H escape to space becomes a significant H2O sink — if that stage worked fast enough relative to solar brightening, a runaway H2O case could be prevented, and it would be a dry (er) heat.

In any case, I know I have brought this up before, but another carbon cycle feedback is kicking in: heat stress is reducing the ability of plants to act as carbon sinks, at least during the warmer, dryer years.

As Hal Doiron, a NASA thermal engineer, bluntly puts it: «When I look at the ocean I see one of the largest heat - sinks in the solar system.

The second thing that must occur; after the water Temperature stalls at 273.15 Kelvins, is that 80 calories per gram of water, must be removed to some colder heat sink, again per the second law, and only after that heat energy, is sucked out of the water by a continuous thermal chain of ever cooler thermally conductive media, to some far cooler place, can the liquid water molecules close in on each other as the water turns to ice.

Many factors — like the thermohaline circulation, which reverses direction at the poles as warm salty water releases heat into the air and sinks down to the bottom — are heavily influenced by the ocean's salinity, and thus, the movement of freshwater into and around the Arctic plays an important role in shaping both regional and global climate.

So it's all gases at greatest density will be doing the same thing around the planet at the same time (*) and as these change with differences in density in the play between gravity and pressure and kinetic and potential from greatest near the surface to more rarified, less dense and absent any kinetic to write home about the higher one goes, then, energy conservation intact, the hotter will rise and cool because losing kinetic energy means losing temperature, thus cooling they which began with the closest in density and kinetic energy as a sort of band of brothers near the surface will rise and cool at the same time whereupon they'll all come down together colder but wiser that great heights don't make for more comfort and giving up their heat will sink displacing the hotter now in their place when they first went travelling.

Water (when present) is at the same temperature as the heat source / sink.

How about this logic... if the ocean is an enormous heat sink and ate their warming, and this was not anticipated or built into the models AT ALL, then the models are all cr @p, the huge sensitivity to C02 (amplification) is in the same crock of poo (i.e. the ocean provides damping and there is no amplification), and there really is no such thing as CAGW... there's only 134 pathetic excuses for climate models that are all wrong because the scientists didn't consider that 75 - ish percent of the globe was covered with water.

When I started to look at the global warming issue my initial inclination was to look at Ocean data, since it's such a huge heat sink, relatively constant backscatter, and potentially the source one would want to measure with as much accuracy as possible., Also, Seemed to me like it was a «natural» filter of noisy data.

JCH As a former sub sailor, sea water temperature was very important for a number of reasons, it being the ultimate heat sink for all electronics, cooling and propulsion equipment, as well as determining operational depth at timeAs a former sub sailor, sea water temperature was very important for a number of reasons, it being the ultimate heat sink for all electronics, cooling and propulsion equipment, as well as determining operational depth at timeas well as determining operational depth at timeas determining operational depth at times.

However, 1 W / m ^ 2 is sunk in the ocean heat sink and 1 W / m ^ 2 is returned to the atmosphere as latent heat due to the strong evapotranspiration at the surface.