The third example shows how a list published by the Heartland Institute (which has been sponsored by Exxon) of 500 scientists «whose research contradicts man - made global warming scares» (6) turns out to be nothing of the kind: as soon
as these scientists found out what the institute was saying about them, many angrily demanded that their names be removed.
As someone who was educated
as a scientist I find the state of the «science» deeply worrying and the tone and content of the public debate almost frightening.
Not exact matches
In a new study based on mice,
scientists at Lancaster University
found that a drug that goes after three diabetes - related targets «significantly reversed the memory deficit» in mice who got the drug,
as measured by their performance in a maze test when compared to mice who didn't get the drug.
A study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
found that, when asked to rate junior
scientists based on scholarly accomplishments and job interview performance, academics in the traditionally male - dominated STEM fields rated female candidates
as being more hireable than their equally qualified male applicants.
Think of food companies» plight this way: The finest
scientists in industry have spent decades trying to
find or invent a no - calorie sweetener that tastes and feels
as good
as the stuff extracted from pure cane.
Applying what I've learned from behavioral
scientists such
as B.J. Fogg, Daniel Kahneman and Charles Duhigg, I've
found that by simply breaking habits down into their chain of actions, I can identify and target key moments to rewire behavioral tendencies — for my users and hopefully for myself.
A group of
scientists from Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany recently
found that they were able to identify what kind of films a group of subjects viewed — whether it was funny, sad or suspenseful — based on the different combinations of chemicals, or peaks of one in particular, such
as carbon dioxide, that were
found in the air in the theater.
But computer
scientists are
finding novel ways to use GPU acceleration to speed up applications off - screen,
as well.
While this is not
as exciting a
find as the planet covered with oceans of oil that everyone was hoping
scientists would
find, maybe the promise of untold riches is just the incentive NASA needs to get its space program in gear.
Tony
founded All4Cure after 27 - years
as a Professor of Medicine / Hematology and physician
scientist at the University of Washington (UW).
That same year, Shockley and seven other
scientists founded Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory, the «first silicon device and research manufacturing company in Silicon Valley,»
as a plaque marking the spot in Mountain View reads today.
Prior to
founding Porifera, Dr. Bakajin was an accomplished
scientist who performed pioneering work on fluid flow through carbon nanotubes, has co-authored 13 issued, and several pending patents
as well
as numerous publications that have been cited over 12,000 times.
«I
find it
as difficult to understand a
scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the existence of the universe
as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science.»
I
find it hard to take this event seriously,
as Bill Nye is hardly even an engineer, much less a
scientist who has spent any time whatsoever studying evolution or the hard sciences.
[2] Among
scientists who
find the evidence persuasive, a variety of natural explanations have been proposed, such
as the anthropic principle along with multiple universes.
As a genuine request, look into the scientific research that the RCC is and has been doing and you will find that their scientific division works on the same cutting edge problems as non-Christian Scientist
As a genuine request, look into the scientific research that the RCC is and has been doing and you will
find that their scientific division works on the same cutting edge problems
as non-Christian Scientist
as non-Christian
Scientists.
As long as some evolutionary scientists continue to protect their turf by attacking those with different views man will never find the answe
As long
as some evolutionary scientists continue to protect their turf by attacking those with different views man will never find the answe
as some evolutionary
scientists continue to protect their turf by attacking those with different views man will never
find the answer.
md2205 The basics of evolutionary biology are easy to
find,
as these others have indicated, but you really do have to get educated by actual
scientists, it seems.
@CaptainObvious «The vast majority of the scientific community
as a whole subscribes to intelligent design» Dr. Greg Graffin's PHD Thesis, which
found that the overwhelming majority of
scientists are atheists.
It
found that very successful
scientists are about 5 times
as likely to have no current religious affiliation (it's arguable if that equates more to atheism or agnosticism) than the general population.
In fact,
scientists have been unable to create a single left - hand protein molecule
as found in all animals.
To understand why Behe's argument is so uncontested in the realm of fact, and yet why so many
scientists find the concept of irreducible complexity not only difficult to accept but even impossible to consider, we should start by summarizing the modern understanding of Darwinism,
as set out by Richard Dawkins.
They've
found these buried in enough layers that it would make it appear we had these planes
as long ago
as the secular
scientists claim.
Although most mainstream
scientists see it
as Creationism by any other name, it is entirely possible that ID will soon
find its way into school curricula.
Dr. Cobb suggests that Christianity needs the actual adoption of already - developed ideas
as well
as new ideas: «It is
as important to liberate theology to pursue saving truth wherever it can be
found (
scientists, philosophers, Hindus...)
as to liberate particular groups of people from oppression.»
(Some
scientists now
find evidence for both forces in the universe.5) Gnostic and charismatic approaches assume the spontaneous inner energy of the known world, whether in the cosmos itself (the gnostic view), or by active spirit,
as the charismatic view has it.
The specific purpose of the church Eddy
founded is to be an effective agency for the spiritual awakening upon which,
as Christian
Scientists see it, the solution of humanity's manifold problems ultimately rests.
I also
found it ironic that somebody who claims to be a
scientist would quote Fred Hoyle
as if he were an authority on the theory.
This is one thing that bugs me about evolution
scientist is that they
find evidence for micro evolution and then lump into together with macro and pass it off
as validating scientific proof it's just poor science.
As it happens, I coined the original slogan in an attempt to keep together the western environmentalists and the Third World economists and church leaders; and of course I frowned when, subsequently, «the integrity of creation» was substituted, an expression which
scientists I know
find meaningless.
I know several
scientists and they have a hard time arguing against any of the
findings because evolution is not observable
as Mr. Nye claims.
Not what u see on CNN, not what your mum said nor your pastor or priest said and not what u see some Muslims neighbors of yours do... noooo nay,,, what have u searched your self... i dare u do...
find the true, i swear nothing makes any sense
as Islam does, those guys know the whole truth... even if it will hurt, just like Santa - clause when u 12 year or the rats that gives money to the de toothing kid in our Ugandan myth, u deserve to know the truth... and if no
scientist has come out and disproved the divine origin of this universe logically then there must be a mighty some one behind it and that Creator or whatever it is, HE has a way, a straight path to Him and we are obliged to know it... so my adverse to u is look hard for the true coz it is clear from false, even if u may hate it!!
Very well said Tim — You forgot to mention to have the unbelievers explain fish skeletons
scientists have
found over the years in the clefts of mountain top ranges, shark teeth discovered all in the Arizona deserts — Of course we know it was the flood — To a lot of non believers I speak to; it's sad because
as opposed to looking / researching God's many evidences that He has left there are so many willfully ignorant in listening to modern man's (& I might add) opinion with nothing to back up evolution theories.
Much has been written about science and religion in general, but little has appeared to help
scientists find Christian meaning in their jobs
as scientists.
The survey did
find that factors other than perception of stigma also deterred childbearing, such
as long hours, particularly for research
scientists running labs and applying for grants, and the difficulty of
finding affordable and reliable childcare.
Political
scientist Ruth Melkonian - Hoover
finds that white evangelicals who worship alongside immigrants are far less likely to view immigrants
as a threat (19.6 %) than white evangelicals
as a whole (50.7 %).
As one
scientist interviewed said, he «should be
finding layers of glassy droplets and fused rock in sea - core samples, the sorts of things we
find at all other similar impact sites.»
For any
scientist to say «I believe I
found god» is against the way a research project is to be conducted, meaning, you can not jump to conclusions,
as that is unscientific.
Leading contemporary paleontologists such
as David Raup and Niles Eldredge say that the fossil problem is
as serious now
as it was then, despite the most determined efforts of
scientists to
find the missing links.
So here's what I think about the election: The forecasts — based on complicated models —
found in the APSA's PS by real social
scientists — with the exception of the one by the astute James Campbell — are,
as usual, too timid in terms of picking up the impending surge....
No twentieth century
scientist has been willing to define life (which I
find supremely ironic
as some physicians testify before Congress about when life begins!).
Confronting the same constellation of objects
as before and knowing that he does so, he nevertheless
finds them transformed through and through in many of their details... Operations and measurements are paradigm - determined...
Scientists with different paradigms engage in different concrete laboratory manipulations.
Their
findings showed that some 34 \ % of their sample of
scientists described themselves
as atheist, and a further 30 \ %
as agnostic (3 \ % and 5 \ %, respectively, in the general population).
If you were a
scientist hoping to isolate the fan gene, Alabama would make the perfect laboratory... A recent poll by the Mobile Register
found that 90 percent of the state's citizens describe themselves
as college football fans.
The circular relationship between individual and social problems becomes increasingly clear
as the research
findings of the behavioral
scientists accumulate.
First, we must say that,
as a working hypothesis, reductionism is the major basic tool
found to be in use among the great majority of active experimental
scientists.
The voices of theologians who were receptive to this genre, like Ralph Burhoe,
founding editor of Zygon, a journal dedicated to the interchange between religion and science, were seldom taken
as seriously by theologians
as they were by
scientists.
The premise is straightforward enough: A woman's husband contracts a fatal illness from a quarantined region known
as the Shimmer, so she goes in with a team of
scientists to
find the source of the Shimmer and save his life.
I always
find it interesting when people list
scientists who happen to be religious,
as if that somehow validates their religious belief.
Then... to ignore the fossil records
found by
scientists,
as well
as all the other evolutionary discoveries just to maintain some sick devotion to an invisible deity... it absolutely staggers the imagination.