Sentences with phrase «as the scientists who»

Well at least my views aren't as crazy as those scientists who think we came from a fish or aliens!»

James Duddridge as the scientist who's spotted the rounding error which means the asteroid will hit earth after all https://t.co/MH5jB8nbVP pic.twitter.com/4gFBiy64 7P

Recent hires at her firm have included a scientist with expertise in both chemistry and pharmacology, as well as a scientist who specialized in computer science and bioinformatics.

As a scientist who has never had extensive ethics training, the other of us (Wendy Law), an SEP postdoctoral fellow, attended ethics courses at the University of Washington and Georgetown University, as well as teacher professional development workshops on using ethics in the classroom offered by the Washington Association for Biomedical Research and by UW's High School Human Genome Project.

In the global health community, Lange is remembered as a scientist who didn't just study problems but also tried to solve them.

These researchers assert themselves as scientists who don't fit the stereotypes that are typically applied to women in the field.

RobRDunn: As a scientist who also writes the writing also gives me an excuse to dig deep into the library and roam the shelves.

As a scientist who is also a Jesuit brother, Consolmagno suggests that science poses philosophical questions that in turn spark religious inquiries.

As a result, we are viewed by the research community not only as sales people, but also as scientists who can provide valuable input into the client's research.

«As a scientist who is grateful to have received Trust funding for my own work, I know first - hand how its flexible support makes such achievements possible,» he said.

1For the purposes of the CCAMLR Scholarship Scheme an early career scientist is defined as a scientist who is actively engaged in relevant PhD research, or has received their PhD in the last 5 years.

As a scientist who, as a teenager was enchanted with the concept of a molecule that instructed our inheritance, I am awed and astounded to be among the first to look across the billions of bases of DNA landscape of the black - footed ferret, an opportunity seemingly beyond the realm of possibility less than a human lifetime ago.

As a scientist who does both, it seems that you're in a good position to explain how the two tie together.

Dr. Ghannoum As the scientist who named the mycobiome (our body's fungal community), I am dedicated to helping people...

Worse yet, this unlikely character has been paired oddly with Naomie Harris as a scientist who used to work for the capitalists and knows the antidote that might shrink the animals.

Ken Watanabe and Sally Hawkins bring just he right amount of gravitas to their roles as the scientists who've been investigating these elusive monsters, and the electromagnetic pulses their activities create, for decades.

There's also Ken Watanabe and Sally Hawkins as scientists who have been given every single stock disaster movie scientist line of dialogue to say.

Rounding out the cast are Michael Stuhlbarg as a scientist who is uneasy about Strickland's plans to weaponize the creature, or worse.

«Don't cross the yellow line,» is what Jeff Goldblum says, as a scientist who wants to work alone.

The film stars Sarah Polley and Adrien Brody as scientists who defy the rules and forge ahead with dangerous testing in which they splice together human and animal DNA.

Based on the short story by Donald A. Wollheim, Mimic (1997), an early effort from Pan's Labyrinth writer - director Guillermo del Toro, finds Mira Sorvino (not long after her Mighty Aphrodite Oscar win) cast as a scientist who creates a new strain of insect to help combat a deadly disease that's being spread by cockroaches across New York City.

Rampage (PG - 13 for violence, mass destruction, brief profanity and obscene gestures) Dwayne Johnson and Naomie Harris co-star in this action comedy as scientists who save the day when three animals mutated into monsters decimate the Windy City in the wake of a genetic experiment gone terribly awry.

The original 1958 release, based on a short story by George Langelaan, was directed by Kurt Neumann, and starred David Hedison as a scientist who...

Garland's film version of Annihilation stars Natalie Portman as a scientist who sets out on an expedition to Area X, after her husband (played by Garland's Ex Machina star, Oscar Isaac) returns permanently and mysteriously changed, in the wake of his own year - long trip to the region.

In fact, the breed was designed for that trait specifically, as the scientist who created these dogs (a German named Karl Dobermann) wanted a pup that would stay active and be ideal for work.

As a scientist who studies vocal communication in mammals, she decided to investigate the manipulative meow.

As a scientist who pores over medical journals on a continual basis, I almost fell out of my chair laughing when I read that line.

As a scientist who hopes to be viewed as a responsible skeptic, I present this comment only as my personal opinion.

Science is only as good as the scientists who are doing the research.

[3] I explain in my presentations that as a scientist who is fully qualified to understand climate change, I seem dumber than the people who say they «know» the answers because I do not profess to know the future, especially of something so complicated as the global climate.

Such as the scientist who died too young who first put out the idea of lateral evolution when evolution had been considered a linear progression.

Such as those scientists who allow their ideological beliefs to dictate their views on what should be scientific issues?

Does someone who makes crayons or labor in a field all day really need to have the same weight in this discussion as a scientist who's devoted their lives to learning and sharing information about this subject?

I think he entered it as a scientist who was skeptical of the climate scientists» handling of their data.

Think of them as scientists who all run the same experiment sampling the same population, and some accept the null and others reject the null, since they get different samples.

And the handful who are tend to have a slim track record, with about half as many papers published as the scientists who accept the mainstream view.

As a scientist who does not work in climate science, my life and research are likely to be directly and negatively impacted by the fact that we are warming the planet.

Unfortunately, he was vilified on the grounds that he had receved financial support from Philip Morris — just as scientists who question the global warming scare are vilified if they have received much - needed funding from the fossil fuel industry — as you have described so eloquently elsewhere on your blog.

as I scientist who has cataloged many IPCC mistakes and omissions.

At the very least we will have a clear picture of which one's are vaguely acquainted with the core principles of Science, and those that are merely advocates masquerading as Scientists who must be rooted out.

Thinking people will see you as a scientist who should by nature be skeptical, even of their own findings.

Not exact matches

For example, as Taya Cohen, Ph.D., an assistant professor of organizational behavior and theory at Carnegie Mellon University, told New Scientist, people who score low on the Honesty - Humility factor might be more likely to cheat on their time sheets or steal office supplies.

As with Tinder, scientists who use the app (called «Papr») will be able to swipe left or right based on whether or not they like the, err, prospective paper.

In a new study based on mice, scientists at Lancaster University found that a drug that goes after three diabetes - related targets «significantly reversed the memory deficit» in mice who got the drug, as measured by their performance in a maze test when compared to mice who didn't get the drug.

Maybe the clearest and most dystopian glimpse of where all of this is headed comes courtesy of Tim Hwang, who breeds artificially intelligent «socialbots» as co-founder and chief scientist of the Orwellian - sounding Pacific Social Architecting Corporation.

Our «competitive advantage» was our creative genius family friend, Bill Keister, a retired Bell Labs scientist who invented puzzles as a hobby.

Trump, who's never served, hews to a different standard, as he makes clear when he cites the speculation of «many people» as evidence his Democratic opponent's emails got a scientist killed.

It was 1917, and although the calorie had been used in chemistry circles for decades — and is often credited to scientists such as Wilbur Olin Atwater and Nicolas Clément — it was Peters who was responsible for popularizing the idea that all we need to become healthier is knowing how much energy is in our food and fervently cutting back the excess.

Luckily, they're an easy sort to spot: The company seeks out engineers and scientists who are heavily involved in their communities (such as people who moonlight as Girl Guide leaders, soccer coaches or Rotary Club members).

Walmsley, who took over a year ago, is focusing on rebuilding GSK's drug pipeline by overhauling research and appointing heavyweight outsiders, such as veteran Roche scientist Hal Barron.