Sentences with phrase «as the tank warms»

Not exact matches

Moreover, a warm mist humidifier is good for killing bacteria growing inside the humidifier's tank, as it boils the water it releases.

They also make awesome nursing tanks that both cover your belly to keep you warm and keep those mama hormones from being interrupted by the chill or self - consciousness we sometimes have as new mamas about our bellies, especially if someone were to walk in on our pumping session.

There's also a feast of human skin available, as people in warmer climes often wear tank tops, flip - flops, and shorts.

That fits with the views of the Republican primary electorate, which tends to see warming as a low priority, according to Jerry Taylor, president of the Niskanen Center, a libertarian think tank that supports conservative policies to address rising temperatures.

I had thought there was a legitimate scientific debate about the role of global warming and hurricanes, but it appears that the deniers, although they are legitimate scientists, seem to have fallen in with the think tank ideologues and PR lobbyists who masquerade as scientists.

Since we're heading somewhere warm by plane before the cruise, I'm most likely going to wear this tank, throw this on as a layer, and have my scarf nearby for extra warmth.

Secret Weapons: I always pack a couple of silk tanks or camisoles to wear as a base layer underneath my tops on warmer days.

Wear this tank dress as a cover - up at the beach, a warm - up at the gym, and a straight - up classic everywhere else.

For the walk home, as the weather cools down, a fun tassel scarf should keep you warm ~ wear silk tank + tube skirt + pumps + biker jacket + scarf.

Here in Arizona is it much warmer and I mostly wear leggings and tanks or even shorts if I exercise late in the day (as seen in last picture below).

I love the idea of a cardigan worn as a top and you can layer a cute tank underneath if it warms up during the day.

If the day starts out chilly and then turns warm, you have the option to remove a layer and still have a pulled - together outfit, as long as you opt for a nice tank underneath.

I layered it over a white tank, which is perfect for warm days — but as it cools down, I plan to layer it over a leather jacket, long - sleeved tee or sweatshirt.

For warmer weather I would do Bravado nursing tank + infinity scarf (to use as a nursing cover) + skirt / shorts

Tossing away the Volt altogether would be a misstep in my eyes, especially as the climate for plug - in hybrids warms and consumers cozy up to the idea of plugging their vehicles in rather than simply filling the tank.

It is a deliberate lie, scripted by ExxonMobil - funded propaganda mills disguised as «conservative think tanks», that is demonstrably false and as such it does not belong in the debate about what to do about anthropogenic global warming.

It's clear this is already happening and we can expect more op - eds in major newspapers from the likes of George Will, more full - page adverts from industry - funded propaganda mills masquerading as «conservative» think tanks, and more comments posted on every blog where global warming is discussed, denouncing the «vast liberal hoax» of anthropogenic global warming, because, you know, it's been proved that the earth isn't warming, and if it is, it has nothing to do with fossil fuels.

The Global Warming Policy Forum» and is a «London - based think tank which conducts campaigns and activities which do not fall squarely within the Global Warming Policy Foundation's remit as an educational charity.»

Nigel Lawson describes the GWPF as an «all - party and non-party think - tank and a registered educational charity which, while open - minded on the contested science of global warming, is deeply concerned about the costs and other implications of many of the policies currently being advocated.»

The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is a United Kingdom think tank founded by climate change denialist Nigel Lawson with the purpose of combating what the foundation describes as «extremely damaging and harmful policies» designed to mitigate climate change.

Any analysis on this issue coming out of a think tank that has engaged in global warming contrarianism must be regarded as valueless unless its results have been reproduced independently, after taking account of possible data mining and cherry picking.

(Dunlap and McCright, 2011:144) The mainstream conservative movement, embodied in conservative foundations and think tanks, quickly joined forces with the fossil fuel industry (which recognized very early the threat posed by recognition of global warming and the role of carbon emissions) and wider sectors of corporate America to oppose the threat of global warming not as an ecological problem but as a problem for unbridled economic growth.

As I mentioned yesterday, the Swedish scientist Lennart Bengtsson, former director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, winner of the 2005 Descartes Research Prize and the 2006 World Meteorological Organization IMO Prize and a man whose contributions to science far outweigh Michael Mann's, recently revealed that he was joining the advisory board of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a think - tank for rational skepticism founded in London by Nigel Lawson.

Darwall, an economist and CPS - listed expert, is best known for his book The Age of Global Warming, which has been touted by notorious climate denial think tank the Heartland Institute as being «the first book to tell the full story of the concerns over global warming.Warming, which has been touted by notorious climate denial think tank the Heartland Institute as being «the first book to tell the full story of the concerns over global warming.warming.»

Speaking at a conference hosted by the Heartland Institute, a denier think tank, Moore went on to say «Let's hope for a little warming as opposed to a little cooling.

What you describe is exactly the outcome that Exxon - Mobil and other fossil fuel companies desire, and have achieved by their funding of right - wing propaganda mills, disguised as «think tanks», that spew a steady stream of fake, phony, pseudoscientific bunk and employ cranks and liars to create the completely false impression that there is a genuine «debate» about the reality of anthropogenic global warming.

For much of the 2000's, left - leaning think tanks sprang up around the nation with a common mission — to dream up strategies for countering the Bush administration with progressive policy solutions, and answer the loud horde of rightwing think tanks (just as this site has so powerfully done on global warming).

Nigel Lawson founded a climate - change think - tank, The Global Warming Policy Foundation where he currently serves as Chairman.

The quotations from Greenpeace, Tony Juniper and Reuters are similarly distorted by the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank that also employs Milloy and that opposes action to address global warming, as well as by the Cybercast News Service (which used to call itself the «Conservative News Service» before changing its name, in an evident effort to disguise its political agenda).

In July 2010, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), a British think tank that is skeptical about global warming policy, [21] hired Montford to lead an inquiry into the three British investigations into the Climatic Research Unit email controversy, commonly known as «ClimaWarming Policy Foundation (GWPF), a British think tank that is skeptical about global warming policy, [21] hired Montford to lead an inquiry into the three British investigations into the Climatic Research Unit email controversy, commonly known as «Climawarming policy, [21] hired Montford to lead an inquiry into the three British investigations into the Climatic Research Unit email controversy, commonly known as «Climategate.

The task of the climate sceptics in the think tanks and PR companies hired by fossil fuel companies was to engage in «consciousness lowering activities», to «de-problematise» global warming by characterising it as a form of politically driven panicmongering.

Limiting global warming to 2 - degree rise will require $ 180 / t carbon price says energy think tank (11/13/2008) In a report released Wednesday the International Energy Agency warned that a business - as - usual approach to energy use would result in a 6 ° - degree rise in temperatures putting hundreds of millions at risk from reduced water supplies and diminished agricultural production.

Except for picturing the baptismal tank as the most wonderful home spa, I just couldn't warm up to the idea.