Sentences with phrase «as their followers at»

In each of these cases, Apple has come off as pragmatic at best or as a follower at worst.

«It is now several years since McIntyre, McKitrick and Wegman showed that the methods used by Mann, Bradley and Hughes, as well as their followers at CRU to process hundreds of proxies lead to false conclusions.

Not exact matches

An «influencer» with 50,000 Twitter followers, for example, will get the same priority as one with 30, at least as far as the customer service department is concerned.

Take some cues from Natalie Jill, licensed sports nutritionist, functional trainer and the creator of Natalie Jill Fitness, who has more than 1 million followers between Facebook and Instagram and whose at - home fitness videos often receive as many as 2 million views on Facebook.

Followers do accept requests without complaint, and perform just as well as their counterparts, but the lack of independent thinking and leadership is a major fault when you look at your company from a distance.

As a presidential candidate — and now president elect — who has at present more than 800 thousand followers on the platform, Trump's comments are part of the mainstream political discourse, said Zuckerberg.

As you identify your high - potentials for leadership roles, the ones who will really get their tribes to respond and engage at a high level will listen with this modus operandi: how can I help my follower to be the best person and employee he / she can be?

As a CAT follower from way back, I was stunned at just how strong the company's earnings were.

There were also the Hussite Wars from 1419 to circa 1434 in which the Roman Catholic Church went to war against followers of Jan Hus, a priest, philosopher, and master at Charles University in Prague who had tried to reform the Church, condemning its sale of indulgences, which were the equivalent of a «get out of jail» card in the game of Monopoly in that the Church sold them as a means for believers to get out of Purgatory.

They don't have as many followers as you though, I doubt anybody would kill over them, try to impede science education, put public health at risk, or infringe on peoples happiness in their name.

also the antichrist put a specific picture for every human god to be easier for him to persuade the followers that he is the same god they were waiting for as he will appear for every one of thos at the same time in different places with the same picture and with the same mirecles they belive in.

It is far past the time that modernists such as yourself exit the doors and go find a good protestant Church to hang out with your girlfriends at, and leave the pious and devout followers of the faith to represent it.

Each side sends out as many gullible followers as they can find or buy and they send them to an agreed upon place where they bash eachothers heads in and stab at eachother with spears and arrows and eventually only a few survivors will wander back to their masters covered in blood and wounds and claim Truth for their side, since whichever side won was obviously God's chosen ones...

At one time the Catholic natural law philosophy of Thomas Aquinas and his followers dominated European thinking, but its metaphysical foundations were undermined as science replaced Aristotelian teleology and Catholic theology with a materialist worldview that considers only efficient causes.

While the statement made about government welfare during the time of Christ has some merit, I believe that Republicans should take a good look at themselves and ask are they doing anything to stop poverty around the world, as I believe Christ would want his followers to do.

So at the end of the day, even as a follower of the teachings of Jesus Christ (the name Christian has been so stained, refuse to call myself one to distance myself from traitors to God like Bush and just about every Conservative American), I'd vote for an astheist with good ideas and was brave enough to push for the interests of people, not corporations, then I would vote for them.

Weeellll, I wouldn't go so far as to call the Catholic church the whore and the Protestant church the false bride, but I do see your point and agree with you that much of institutional religion is not at all what God intended or wanted from followers of Jesus.

Mark himself pictures the dismay of his followers as they went toward Jerusalem; (Mark 10:32) if Professor Turner was right, there is pictured too the strain and tension that filled Jesus» own mind as he advanced at the head of his band of disciples.

The Qadiani organization is at present controlled from Ribwa, a small town in the Punjab which is peopled exclusively by the followers of Ghulam Ahmad, whose successor, known as the Second Messiah, is the head of the organization.

At the same time he maintained that he was still a follower of the Prophet of Islam and a non-lawgiving prophet, and since he brought no new law and adhered to the law of Islam as interpreted and codified by the jurists, he claimed to be a good Muslim.

If Jesus refused to acknowledge and fight for Israel as God's favored nation — even though it was the one nation in history that actually held this status at one time — how much more must his followers refuse to acknowledge and fight for America as God's favored nation?

The discovery was first made by a woman follower of his known as Mary of Magdala, either alone or in the company of other women, all of whom had been present at his death.

There are some great moments when Jesus looks at his followers with a smile almost breaking out, as if he finds them more endearingly comical than disappointing.

At some point will you describe for us what a group of gathered Jesus followers looks like (if they have a person who they call «pastor», what that looks like), what they do when they meet, and how they live out their lives as the church the rest of the time.

On Thursday, Pope Francis continued with his economic message by tweeting «My thoughts turn to all who are unemployed, often as a result of a self - centred mindset bent on profit at any cost,» to his almost 2.5 million followers.

How can we, as followers of Jesus, help others «feel at home» when they are in our presence?

As a result, now at the end of his adventures, Abraham is ready to replace the «reasons» for being a follower of God: Originally, he answered the call largely out of a desire for the promised reward; now, in a reversal, he is ready to follow out of awe - fear - reverence for the One Who promises.

From what I've read about those earliest times, it seems more likely that Paul and Peter were at odds, Paul won and (his followers) got to write the history as they saw fit.

So many people look at the church as a representation of Jesus, and if they don't like what they see, they think, «If that is what Jesus - followers are like, I want nothing to do with Jesus.»

If the Christian right seeks to gain earthly political power (something Christ himself rejected when tempted by Satan), why don't they at least try to find candidates who support the very issues Christ actually spoke about & challenged us to address as his followers?

The followers of Joey Smith, a man who was married to over 57 women at the same time, some as young as 14 years of age, and some a mother - daughter combo is your Mormon prophet.

The thing of it is, if you really, really investigate what Yeshua said, and not just what's in the latest translation of the white man's western Bible, You'd be forced to conclude that his followers perverted his teachings, and the whole thing was now being run as a confidence scam of the first order, to bilk billions out of the unsuspecting and influence social and political order at the same time.

two things first the term Christian means little Christ it was meant as in insult at first, as a Christian it should affect every part of my life, as a true follower of Jesus there is no way I could say I believe this is wrong (but because I am in politics) I will vote another way.

This post is the conclusion to the series on Giving up our Rights in which we have looked at some of the rights we think we deserve, and have seen that as followers of Jesus, we may be called upon to give up these rights for the sake of the gospel.

Haven't read your story yet.would like to share ours with u and your wife sumtime.read a bit here on your blog and already I'm like, that's so my husband and I at the moment!in my opinion you are one of the few people who I can actually relate to as a follower of christ.hopefully more people will become real about where they are at, going beyond the bullshit that is fed to us that has nothing to do with following Jesus.thanx for listening.

Please read genesis where there is no where it is mentioned that there was another partner with the Lord God... don't you think if what you are saying is correct than it will be mentioned in the OT... or OT and NT are contradicting each other... i could show more from the bible itself... i think most of the follower of it does not pay attention what to follow... they just follow blindly as Catholic church does not allow to have a copy of bible with the worshipper while they are at the church... they just have to be listening to the preacher....

When looked at this way, all the parables and teachings from Jesus about the Kingdom of God become much more clear, and we see that as followers of Jesus, we have a much larger role to play on this earth than just sitting around twiddling our thumbs while we wait for the rapture.

The first occasion, as described in the three earlier gospels, finds Jesus alone with his closest followers at a place outside the boundaries of Jewish Palestine, known as Caesarea Philippi.

For he [Mark] had neither heard the Lord nor been his personal follower, but at a later stage, as I said, he had followed Peter, who used to adapt the teachings to the needs of the moment, but not as though he were drawing up a connected account of the oracles of the Lord: so that Mark committed no error in writing certain matters just as he remembered them.

The idea, therefore, of a covenant as the foundation charter (so to speak) of the people of God was very much alive at the time, and there can be no doubt what Jesus had in mind when he invited his followers to drink of the cup of the covenant: he was formally installing them as foundation members of the new people of God.

Christians (real Christ - followers) don't look at it as much as religion vs science as they do faith in the supernatural.

It can also mean (as it is used at times in the New Testament) anyone who is a faithful follower of God.

I just hope that those that are looking for true Christians are not looking at Harold Camping or his followers as examples of what a Christian should be.

You really need to look back and take a long hard look at if you were really «all in» as a follower of Christ... thats all a Christian really is, just to believe in what he did for you and that his sacrifice and grace was sufficient not to be condemned by God.

If we should discover mistakes in the scriptures of their religions or should observe the misconduct of their followers we should not attribute these defaults and shortcomings to the founders of those religions, inasmuch as the perversion of scriptures is possible and it is possible that mistakes of interpretation might find their way into the commentaries, but it is not at all possible that a person should fabricate lies against God and should claim to be a prophet and should put forward his own compositions as the word of God falsely and yet God should grant him respite like the righteous and should bestow upon him wide acceptance by people (Tohfa Qaisariyyah, p. g 10).

The most we can say with certainty at this point is that Jesus may have thought of himself as the Messiah in the Son - of - man sense, and that his first century followers believed he had repeatedly made this claim.

If the followers of Jesus, for any particular reasons, were to regard Jesus as at least the equal of Elijah, then the knowledge of the way their master had died called for something more specific than the simple claim that God had «taken» him.

When we find ourselves at odds with our fellow Christians over issues that are important to us, it's easy to slip into the habit of expecting the worst in one another, forgetting just how much we have in common as followers of Jesus.

The hardest task, the more courageous task, the task to which Jesus calls all His followers, is to seek alternative methods to dealing with violence that both affirm our inherent dignity as humans, while at the same time, refusing to resort to violence.

At the same time, however, we may be permitted to entertain reservations about some interpretations of revelation, such as that of Karl Barth and his followers, which make revelation so absolutely interruptive and «different» that it casts all of our natural aspirations in a suspicious light.