Sentences with phrase «as they are wrong far»

Not exact matches

«It will be a real huge downer if it blows up, but... if something goes wrong, hopefully it goes wrong far into the mission so we at least learn as much as possible along the way,» Musk told Business Insider's space correspondent, Dave Mosher, on the call.

As soon as I hear something like, «They worked for IBM,» or «They went to Harvard,» alarm bells start going off in my head because those are the wrong things to be looking at — at least as far as job qualifications gAs soon as I hear something like, «They worked for IBM,» or «They went to Harvard,» alarm bells start going off in my head because those are the wrong things to be looking at — at least as far as job qualifications gas I hear something like, «They worked for IBM,» or «They went to Harvard,» alarm bells start going off in my head because those are the wrong things to be looking at — at least as far as job qualifications gas far as job qualifications gas job qualifications go.

As far as CNBC's sources who said investors should expect more delays, Tesla said in its statement that this was blatantly wronAs far as CNBC's sources who said investors should expect more delays, Tesla said in its statement that this was blatantly wronas CNBC's sources who said investors should expect more delays, Tesla said in its statement that this was blatantly wrong:

If management is wrong, and hepatitis C sales accelerate to this downside even further, Gilead's shares are sure to print new lows as a result.

Everyone who called Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies a bubble has been proven wrong, or are at least suffering losses, so far, as the segment didn't look back...

As far as the donating goes, if they want to donate to a church organization then that's fine but to donate to groups that stand against my right to live free and have the same rights as everyone else is this god for sacking country then that's just wronAs far as the donating goes, if they want to donate to a church organization then that's fine but to donate to groups that stand against my right to live free and have the same rights as everyone else is this god for sacking country then that's just wronas the donating goes, if they want to donate to a church organization then that's fine but to donate to groups that stand against my right to live free and have the same rights as everyone else is this god for sacking country then that's just wronas everyone else is this god for sacking country then that's just wrong.

As far as living in wrong country... I served My Country this country to be exact where i was born and raiseAs far as living in wrong country... I served My Country this country to be exact where i was born and raiseas living in wrong country... I served My Country this country to be exact where i was born and raised.

And as far as the spineless «R» If taking a stand for commonsense is wrong, it's not Rush Limbaugh comments that will hurt the GOP in the election but their lack of morals.

But since you personally do nt like the possibility that your comfortable world view could be wrong, you rely on science (as far as it can take you) and theories (that do nt challenge your world view).

A historical compilation of man, his understanding of himself as far as what was right and wrong... and a means to control the masses.

And as for the clear admonition that homosexual sex is wrong... the scriptural case against such a notion is FAR STRONGER than any supporting it.

Unfortunately, though, with people being discouraged to pursue the liberal arts in the 21st century, openings for these positions are becoming few and far between, and people who have that philosophical blood running through their veins sometimes take on preacher positions as a way to make ends meat, which is wrong because it is the essence of living a lie.

Nevertheless, this coming reign of God involved the ending of social wrongs, and it is of importance to note that, so far as the records reveal, Jesus» concern about social iniquities always sprang from his indignant perception of their ill effect on individuals.

sorry; i must have hit the wrong reply button — this SHOULD have been tagged as a reply to a thread further down the page where i pointed out that the «Pastor» Knapp had shaved and was wearing a shirt made of a blended fabric — both also prohibited in Leviticus.

Hegel was wrong, so far as I can tell, about most....

He refuses to see atheism as the neutral default position of man because he has misspent his life chasing the coat tails of pedofiles and embezzlers and to admit now that he was wrong would just be too hard for him to bear, so he's going to ride out the wave of bullshlt and see just how far it takes him...

If someone can not further explain an answer without being accused of attempting to change their «wrong» answer (in your view) without admitting mistake then I guess you hold people to an impossibly high standard and as you say «one that you can not keep yourself.»

As far as I am concerned, most of the comments about the President's faith on this page, and the very topic of this article are what is wrong with ChristianitAs far as I am concerned, most of the comments about the President's faith on this page, and the very topic of this article are what is wrong with Christianitas I am concerned, most of the comments about the President's faith on this page, and the very topic of this article are what is wrong with Christianity.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

You raised some genetic doubts about that process and I can't answer that (so far) as I don't have the knowledge, so I don't know if they are right or wrong.

In this battle, a view which presupposes that it is not only impossible but wrong for authority to protect and further common beliefs and ways of life gains increasing control of our imagination, and as it does it erodes the foundations necessary for a church to remain a church.

As far as Rush speaking things that are wrong, its easy to tell for his mouth will be opeAs far as Rush speaking things that are wrong, its easy to tell for his mouth will be opeas Rush speaking things that are wrong, its easy to tell for his mouth will be open.

Whitehead thinks that Bergson believes spatialization is a really bad thing, which is wrong; an understandable conclusion, perhaps, but not accurate, as Gunter and Hausman argue, and I will further demonstrate below.

Why do you talk about only what he didn't menage to do, or what was wrong in his pontificate?Yes, I agree there were many things that could have been resolved in better way, but he was only a human and as everybody could make mistakes.To me what is important in his pontificate is that he was a first pope who «opened «the church to people, who travelled a lot, met with people, went to synagogue, did much to abolish communism.Sure, he wasn't ideal, but for me the best pope so far.

And as far as the Jerusalem controversy, I would suggest that that debate was a good display of God giving a view of how men bring in false teaching, only to have God use his voices to make right a wrong view being introduced to the Church.

Hegel was wrong, so far as I can tell, about most things, but he was right at least about this: the movement of thought is, in the sense just mentioned, dialectical.

To survive what is bearing down on us, we must learn four hard lessons: to acknowledge the natural law as a true and universal morality; to be on guard against our own attempts to overwrite it with new laws that are really rationalizations for wrong; to fear the natural consequences of its violation, recognizing their inexorability; and to forbear from all further attempts to compensate for immorality, returning on the path that brought us to this place.

The error arises from a wrong interpretation of the obvious fact that everybody wants to be a self, to have a sense of the value of his or her selfhood, and to realize, so far as may be, the potentialities given in that selfhood.

This causes further tensions in relations with the Canadian public and the perception of Sikhs, what we see as taking a stand and fighting what is wrong, many see as causing uneeded violence, it's a huge culture clash.

If you as believers and non believers think that what I call for is wrong or not a right of prevlage to think of or try to establish thinking in between then I must have been in the wrong place all this time and efforts... Religion is not Completion but rather Correction...!?! It is only then with such knowledge of foundations can mankind use the senses they been gifted to tell which is which for them selves rather than following blindly what ever they been told and not allowed to discuss or look further...!?!

lol, i may very well be wrong — but you are not doing a very good job at proving your stance... you seem more mad then anything in your words... maybe thats just me, but whatever — as far as the fair housing laws — as long as the condo mannagers don't allow anything like that from anyone they are not in volation of the law — but she break the contract she signed and that is that.

But it seems that we have often gone one step further: we justify our own confusion by being suspicious of any certainty, and we interpret the lack of easy answers to mean that any answer is as good as another, that we can not be sure about right and wrong.

In this the church is wrong, so far as the death and resurrection of Jesus are understood merely as given facts of history which may be determined and established by evidence.

I may be wrong, and hope that I am: but I have an uneasy feeling that they will not achieve this by seeing current events as further evidence of their founder's special closeness to God.

I don't think it's something that you can parade, but it's not a right or wrong thing as far as I'm concerned».

The others aren't wrong, they just don't go as far as God would like.

So far as has been shown to the contrary, there is nothing wrong with Premise X and nothing wrong with the standard view of omnipotence.

I often find «Christian Dramas» cheesey but not this one for some reason — I've watched it 4 or 5 times and I cry every time — as far as how you interpret what Jesus should or should not being doing during this presentation that is up to the artist who created the work — there is no right or wrong answer here.

As far as the Catholic Faith goes there have always been those in the Church who have done wrong, and more serious wrong than you are reading about here - namely the first Pope denying he even knew Jesus and all of the rest of the apostles abandoning God to that shameful horrifying death - when they could have stood by Him, defending Him against the authorities and even proving to them that He indeed was God - their Messiah before theAs far as the Catholic Faith goes there have always been those in the Church who have done wrong, and more serious wrong than you are reading about here - namely the first Pope denying he even knew Jesus and all of the rest of the apostles abandoning God to that shameful horrifying death - when they could have stood by Him, defending Him against the authorities and even proving to them that He indeed was God - their Messiah before theas the Catholic Faith goes there have always been those in the Church who have done wrong, and more serious wrong than you are reading about here - namely the first Pope denying he even knew Jesus and all of the rest of the apostles abandoning God to that shameful horrifying death - when they could have stood by Him, defending Him against the authorities and even proving to them that He indeed was God - their Messiah before them!

It is legaly used as both a deterrent for future offenders and to prevent the wronged party from furthering the problem through direct vengance.

If you think that birth control doesn't provide a benefit, such as alleviation of menstrual migraines, endometriosis, PMDD, and prevention of menorrhagia, then your nose has been buried in the wrong book for far too long.

So as far as Christians hating gay people and condeming them and telling them they are wrong..

Scruton devotes his book to proving Nietzsche wrong, and he makes a strong case, at least as far as Wagner's Tristan und Isolde is concerned.

Speaking personally, what a relief to discover that the I was not alone in experiencing spirituality this way and to be affirmed that experiencing God as on a far - distant horizon is not bad, wrong, a sign of spiritual weakness, or a conquest of Satan in my life.

The famous theologica negativa, so far as it was or is merely negative, was wrong all through, or not wrong at all.13 Thomas says it is not wrong at all; I say this is a more nearly logical position than that it is wrong here and there.

I think the recipe must be wrong as a tablespoon seems far too much.

As far as I am concerned you can't go wronAs far as I am concerned you can't go wronas I am concerned you can't go wrong!

Not a one thing wrong with moist as far as I'm concerned.

The two stars of this seasoning are cumin and paprika, so you can be sure that it's going to taste the way it should without worrying that you're doing anything wrong as far as following Paleo goes.

again I could be wrong (and I hope I am... cashews are yummy) AS far as almond butter I figured they probably had sugar added in..AS far as almond butter I figured they probably had sugar added in..as almond butter I figured they probably had sugar added in....