Sentences with phrase «as to what»

-------- Interesting take... Please explain how I have injected my opinion as to what the scripture means?

As to what the Scriptures have to say about homosexual orientation, my brother, you not only have to do deeper research, but most importantly approach Scripture in the Spirit of Love, as a child who knows nothing, seeking the guidance of his Father.

A question might be raised here as to what might be the character of this complex structure of enduring objects, upon which the presiding object, the dominant thread, stages its private satisfactions.

I am trying to be suggestive as to what a Whiteheadian perspective may contribute on a variety of topics.

Even within Christianity there is a huge divide as to what God has declared on this issue.

His notion of the concept of the «Map is not the Territory» really fits here as to what you are saying.

herbeey... you totally missed the point as to what I was saying, Andrew and mustard seed chose the public venue, not I... and on the blog, most anything goes.

They have radically differed as to what is happening to the physical universe as a whole.

In all the Abrahamic religions idolatry is strongly forbidden, although views as to what consti.tutes idolatry may differ within and between them.

You have no clue as to what you are saying and until you provide evidence that your god is real, you sound like the idiot, not the guy writing the article!

It can not make up its mind as to what kind of person the humanities should cultivate: a person who criticizes in pursuit of the truth or an unmasker of ideologies who has given up the quest for truth and settles for constantly unmaking and remaking the world.

Whatever one thinks of Rawls» recondite and demanding theory, it is probable that no more than a few thousand people have read it with care, and most of them are not in agreement as to what it means.

Why would you object to me calling it the real truth, to me that's what it is, why would that bother you, It wouldn't bother me as to what you called it, that's up to you, who cares, it doesn't offend me what you believe, why should it bother you what I believe.

You tell others they don't understand your god and yet you have no idea as to what they know, outside of the fact that they grew up and left imaginary friends (aka god / jesus) behind.

Well, if we translate the Greek word baptizma in Matthew 28:19 - 20, we get a clue as to what Jesus might have actually been teaching... and this leads to the one crazy suggestion about Matthew 28:19 - 20 that might help solve this particular baptism debate.

Perhaps the question as to what their church - relationship means is asked less searchingly among us because of the apparent self - evidence of the answer: we are preparing ministerial leadership for the churches.

Topher Feeling mellow at the time and knowing what the editors will permit, my ad hominems were quite mild as to what I really think in regards to you, use your imagination.

There remains a lot of uncertainty among evangelicals as to what exactly is «postliberalism.»

My main concern is that too many of these «leaders» are restored just with the passing of time and no concern as to what has really taken place in the heart.

Most of the fear about the unpardonable sin comes from the fact that there is much confusion out there as to what exactly this sin is and how it is committed.

As these things commonly go in the post-closet period, we sought out resources as to what we should next.

When asked, I couldn't get an answer as to what they were.

It is important to be clear as to what we have been up to here.

And for sure it depends on the group you are going from as to what their reaction is.

In response to your question as to what my reasons were I have a very simple answer.

There is a difference between a Catholic and a Christian and the difference is all the unfounded laws that were dictated by the church as to what the bible states.

Who on God's good earth has a clue as to what that means (songwriter included)?

Since no one can come up with useful or agreeable criteria as to what constitutes «common sense», it really doesn't get us anywhere.

The Crusades might be an excellent historical subject to read up on if you're a bit unsure as to what I mean.

It does not serve merely as an admonition or moral maxim as to what one ought to do.

Complete speculation of course, but that's my guess as to what's going on.

So, FYI: you can't argue about something you don't have clue as to what it is in the first place!

I'd rather live my life honestly, and be good to my fellow man, and live with a sense of wonder as to what it all means, and hope someday I get the answer.

History is full of communities that were wracked with bitter philosophical divisions as to what the good life meant, and everybody but Aristotle seems to have understood that even when we agree on what goods exist, we may not agree on which ones take precedence when they conflict.

Beck is to the right as to what Rachel Mandow is to the left.

Obviously you have been very ignorant as to what has been going on in America for the last several decades.

My point is that millions of poeple have read the bible and there is no clear majority opinion as to what it says on several major points.

I'm curious as to what Bible these «Chrisitans» are reading??

You still have failed to answer why her potential se.xual orientation or even her color has anything to do with where she is laid to rest... is this due to the fact that you really have no idea as to what the hell you are talking about and only wish to make the world aware of how stupid and ignorant you really are?

I am very open to anything that makes sense as to what this event or substance is.

Most of the contentiousness in this debate is largely born of no education or miseducation as to what the various scientific positions are.

And you would reject my biblical answer as to what a church is.

However, for those who insist on trying to find some meaning from it, they are forced to decide which side of the contradictions to take and since much of it is untrue, they also must guess as to what part of the bible they should accept and what they should ignore as just a fable.

You have no clue as to what we are about.

He has no clue as to what Jesus» message is all about.

I must admit to some curiosity as to what you really meant in your post.

While that may be «accurate» as to what jesus says about marriage, etc.... I am speaking to the * inference * that @barry, for sure and it looks like you....

I actually became curious as to what else it might do to me.

Don't you think you should at least hear what she ACTUALLY SAID as to what Rush lied that she had??

I've heard there is some latitude as to what that passage means.