Not exact matches
I see Brexit
as an
act of
unilateral political disarmament,» he said.
As it stands, we have allowed this to happen to ourselves... We have, in effect, been committing an
act of unthinking,
unilateral educational disarmament.
This
unilateral decision comes just two weeks after four Senators sent a strongly worded letter to the SEC Inspector General, stating «we are concerned that Commissioner Piwowar's actions may lack adequate justification, undermine the SEC's mission, exceed his authority
as acting chairman, violate other procedural requirements, and could potentially prove to be a waste of the SEC staff's precious time and resources.»
Although Pal points to this section
as further evidence of an intent to create single - member geographic districts in 1867, Macfarlane points to these spent provisions which were replaced by the Canada Elections
Act, Parliament of Canada
Act and the Constitution
Act, 1982,
as further evidence of Parliament's
unilateral s. 44 powers.
Two types of error may permit rectification: (a) both parties subscribe to a common mistake that it accurately records the terms of their antecedent agreement; rectification is predicated on the applicant showing the parties had reached a prior agreement whose terms are definite and ascertainable; the agreement was still effective when executed; the document fails to record accurately that prior agreement; and, if rectified
as proposed, the document would carry out the agreement: (b) where the claimed mistake is
unilateral ̶ either because the document formalizes a
unilateral act (such
as the creation of a trust), or where intended to record an agreement between parties, but one party says that it does not accurately do so, while the other party says it does.
Two types of error may permit rectification: (a) both parties subscribe to an instrument under a common mistake that it accurately records the terms of their antecedent agreement; rectification is predicated upon the applicant showing that the parties had reached a prior agreement whose terms are definite and ascertainable; that the agreement was still effective when the instrument was executed; that the instrument fails to record accurately that prior agreement; and that, if rectified
as proposed, the instrument would carry out the agreement; (b) where the claimed mistake is
unilateral ̶ either because the instrument formalizes a
unilateral act (such
as the creation of a trust), or where the instrument was intended to record an agreement between parties, but one party says that the instrument does not accurately do so, while the other party says it does.
This is significant
as for many reviewable practices under the
Act (whether
unilateral conduct, mergers or non-criminal agreements between competitors), anticompetitive effects (whether in the form of a substantial lessening or prevention of competition or an adverse effect on competition) forms part of the elements of the reviewable practice itself.
While neither process purports to be the only answer;
as one size rarely fits all, the horror show that litigation often is, involves people frequently putting on their «Halloween Masks» to use intimidation, threats, cost, and endless
unilateral acts (calculated or otherwise) to gain advantage;... usually at the expense of the family's emotional and financial health.
A multiple listing service is defined
as a facility for the orderly correlation and dissemination of listing information among Participants so that they may better serve their clients and customers and the public; is a means by which authorized Participants make blanket
unilateral offers of compensation to other Participants (
acting as subagents, buyer agents, or in other agency or nonagency capacities defined by law); is a means by which information is accumulated and disseminated to enable authorized Participants to prepare appraisals and other valuations of real property; and is a means by which Participants engaging in real estate appraisal contribute to common databases.