Predicted extinction times more than 100 years in the future are considered too uncertain and thus aren't considered
as valid predictions of extinction, Koop says.
Not exact matches
I developed a generic model for emissions
prediction based on thermodynamic principles (fundamental research), but using empirical constants so
as to ensure its
valid application to different engines (applied research).
They said there's a difference between weather and climate
predictions, but climate is an average of the weather and therefore only
as valid as it.
«Overall, Broeckerâ $ ™ s paper (together with that of Sawyer) shows that
valid predictions of global warming were published in the 1970s in the top journals Science and Nature, and warming has been proceeding almost exactly
as predicted for at least 35 years now.
However, Lucia then chooses — I'm sure for amply
valid reasons — 2001
as the date when the
prediction set out in 1990 was fixed.
Taken together, these two papers (and several similar ones, at least) should convince anyone that «A fundamental and societally relevant conclusion from these studies is that the use of the IPCC model
predictions as a basis for policy making is» a
valid and reasonable approach.
The measurements taken in the 1800's were acceptable but not
as reliable and
valid as the wiki article potrays,
as evidenced by the still significantly off measurements and
predictions made in the 1950's, although these facts do not undo past measurements completely, I take issue with the brief and under stated remarks about the 1800's and shying away from calibration issues.
Although finding a compound patent
valid based on actual utility after construing a low Promise, Mr. Justice Rennie recognized (in obiter) there would be problems with a sound
prediction of any higher Promise, and referred to the «common view» of the disclosure requirement of AZT
as follows: