Not exact matches
Over the centuries, gold has been considered
as an
object of
value by many different groups of people all over the world.
The reason they chose gold versus other
objects is important - gold has certain characteristics that make it a better «store of
value» (
as it is commonly known) than other
objects:
Hatred is what they certainly project, not love for the embryos, which is a piece of nonsense no one could experience, but hatred, a virulent hatred for an unnamed
object... Their hatred is directed against human beings
as such, against the mind, against reason, against ambition, against success, against love, against any
value that brings happiness to human life.
There emerges reflection or self - consciousness.23 Reflection is «the power acquired by consciousness to turn in upon itself, to take possession of itself
as of an
object endowed with its own particular consistence and
value: no longer merely to know, but to know oneself; no longer merely to know, but to know that one knows.»
Hence, we must attribute to God not only the conceptual ordering of the eternal
objects by virtue of which he lures the occasions of the world toward order and
value; we must attribute to him
as to all other actual entities physical feelings
as well.
Because such enduring
objects are more tied to the body, they are more dominated by particular forms of definiteness in their successive satisfactions than the final percipient route, whose sole
value to the body,
as we pointed out above, is its vivid originality.
Although the simple eternal
object defines a class of particulars that
as values of the variable are that definite shade of green, and although these individuals are externally related, the simple eternal
object itself is internally related to the higher grade
object, in that it partially constitutes its essence.
II, p. 241) At the stage of development represented by such an attitude, the
value of religion was measured by the control given the devotee over superhuman powers and, so far
as prayer was used, its
object was to persuade a god to do the bidding of a man.
No more does it help to suggest that God's
value is wholly independent of his relations to the world, whether of knowledge or of will, for this only means that the particular characters of the
objects of his knowledge, or the results of his willing, are to him totally insignificant, which is psychologically monstrous and is religiously appalling
as well..
From this standpoint we can see why it is inadequate to describe the agape of God only
as the spontaneous, unmotivated, uncalculated self - giving of the Holy God, regardless of the
value of its
object.
Originally
as the principle of limitation, the principle of concretion determined which of the eternal
objects would be actualizable in the world, now each occasion actualizes itself in terms of God's gradation of
values.
For Whitehead evidently supposes that it is the
value which God apprehends an eternal
object as possessing, or its suitability for ingression in a particular context, which makes it a lure for action.
They speak, like Wolfgang Köhler, of the «objective requiredness» of
values, and, like Eliseo Vivas, they describe the relation to these
values as the relation of a subject to an independent
object to which man simply responds.
, suggests that in order to be accepted
as valid Buber's anthropology would have to be grounded on empirical psychology and an objective and scientific hierarchy of
values, in other words, on pure subject -
object epistemology.
But taken at face
value, they are alienating insofar
as they betray us into placing our own possibilities outside of us
as attributes of God and not of humanity, viewing ourselves
as unworthy
objects of a projected image of our own essential nature.
It is institutionalized
as worship, and
as ritual ascribing
value to the
object of worship and expressing the inferiority of the worshipper (often symbolized by bowing down).
In so far
as «C major» is highly
valued in this particular aesthetic synthesis, it is included and with it every other eternal
object with which it is internally related — including «D major.»
This referential character adds what is commonly overlooked in discussion of ideality and reality — namely, no eternal
object (or ideal) is ingressed (or realized) simpliciter, but only
as a relatum whose relata are simultaneously ingressed relatively (insofar
as they are graded in
value up or down).
Anger
as an eternal
object is not a
value; it is this particular instance of anger
as characterizing this particular unit of feeling which is a
value.
First, the ordering or
valuing of the eternal
objects has to do with God himself
as an actual entity.
One might also
object that we simply have no need for «
values,» since the word is fully replaceable by less ambiguous and more forceful synonyms, such
as «virtues.»
Each individual
as an
object of the love of God has a unique
value.
This is the natural consequence of the logic of exchange
as the foundation of worth and
value: if worth is based upon what one has or knows or achieves, those who have little by society's standards become worthless and expendable,
objects of scorn, neglect and abuse.
He conceives reality
as the
object of experience, that which is known or
valued.
Peasants were treated
as objects whose
value was non-existent for big farming.
Despite Hall's appeal to the Whiteheadian separation of «practical» and «speculative» reason, 11 I think that on a more fundamental level Whitehead too regards knowing (or more broadly the relation of any actual occasion to its «environment»)
as an active process in which the aim of the subject at its own attainment of
value partially determines how it will respond to the
objects of which it is aware.
It is a radical mistake to treat animals merely
as products,
as objects with no intrinsic
value.
Thus he also regards the «eternal
objects»
as ultimately transtemporal possibilities for
value that are called into actualization in the temporal process.
What makes this monotheism «radical» is its insistence that God is beyond all the many, including the «many» through whom we apprehend God: Scripture, church, even Jesus Christ himself
As the ground of our being and
value, God alone is the proper
Object of our ultimate loyalty and love.
They are Madisonian pluralists who stress Federalist Paper No. 45
as the preferred side of Madison: «The public good, the real welfare of the great body of the people, is the supreme
object to be pursued: and that no form of government whatever has any other
value than
as it may be fitted for the attainment of this
object.»
That is to say, it can be correctly defined
as that which, when made the
object of attentive awareness, yields the
values of religious experience.
I am a passionate Darwinian in explaining why we exist,... but if we lived our lives in a Darwinian way, that would be a very unpleasant society in which to live... One of the reasons for learning about Darwinian evolution is
as an
object lesson in how not to set up our
values and our social lives».
Thus, the principles of esthetic
value here discussed may serve not only
as guides in creating and appreciating what are called «art
objects» and
as criteria of qualitative excellence in curricular matters outside of the arts, but
as attributes of the good life and
as a source of general educational aims.
As we noted above, in the chapter on God in Science and the Modern World, Whitehead presents God as envisaging the possibilities of value as the principle of limitation but he makes no mention of God's envisaging the eternal object
As we noted above, in the chapter on God in Science and the Modern World, Whitehead presents God
as envisaging the possibilities of value as the principle of limitation but he makes no mention of God's envisaging the eternal object
as envisaging the possibilities of
value as the principle of limitation but he makes no mention of God's envisaging the eternal object
as the principle of limitation but he makes no mention of God's envisaging the eternal
objects.
Cobb says,»... the way in which God functions
as the principle of limitation is by ordering the infinite possibilities of the eternal
objects according to principles of
value.
Seems so vain to me, but not really surprising since our culture seems to
value breasts more
as sexual
objects than for their intended purpose.
As a registered charity, Heritage Park is able to issue gift - in - kind income tax receipts for the fair market
value of an
object, in accordance with our procedures and Canada Revenue Agency regulations.
There are many online communities focused on babywearing, High End Babywearing is one that
values carriers for their utility,
as objects (even art), and for their monetary
value.
The House had
objected to using an increase in the local taxes, known
as the «required local effort,» that came
as a result of higher property
values.
It was the President's fervent hope that the deep love Queen Elizabeth shown for the Commonwealth «will continue to light the way for all of us and our successors,
as we endeavour to establish firmly in a world, where many traditional assumptions are under serious threat, the
values of fairness, decency, freedom and openness, which have been the
object of her work.
First mentioned by Pliny the Elder in the first century
as «frog stones,» people believed these small, dull - colored
objects were talismans that had all kinds of medicinal and magical
value.
But Irwin Shapiro, an astrophysicist at the Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., who chaired the 2010 Committee to Review Near - Earth -
Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies for the U.S. National Research Council, says that ground - based observatories such
as the planned Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) on Cerro Pachón in Chile are better
value for money than space telescopes, because they last longer and are less expensive.
As the PR2 moves its joints and manipulates
objects, the algorithm calculates good
values for the 92,000 parameters of the neural net it needs to learn.
Snow, together with her students Carissa Romero and Michael Compton, have also discovered recently that snack foods presented
as real
objects are
valued more than snacks presented
as 2 - D images — a study soon to be published in the journal Cortex.
Since lit stars can form at masses
as low
as ~ 0.04 solar mass, provided the metallicity is 3x that of today's
value, it may be possible to stellarize such
objects provided we could find enough metals to dump in them.
Burt Pugach and his friends consider women
as objects to possess, but human life in general is of little
value to them.
Like Gleeson and Byrne, Gluck seems to recognize his film's inherent frivolousness, frequently calling attention to some of the screenplay's plot mechanics and hacky tropes — at one point even hanging a lampshade on Peter's famous blue jacket, in acknowledgement of the
object's trite
value as an emotional symbold.
As the script keeps reminding us, the older generation's stubbornness has little to do with the economic
value of their memory
objects.
It's hard for me to imagine how the dominant, non-formalist form of film studies, with its systemic handicap of abstaining from
value judgment and not being able to treat the film
as an independent aesthetic
object capable of producing an infinite variety of affects, can be terribly instructive for the enterprise of film criticism, which necessarily calls for a hierarchy of
values on the part of the practitioner and his / her acknowledgement being a sentient, unique subject capable of being transformed by the film.
While well - meaning progressive educators might be willing to criticize the manner in which humans are turned into dead
objects that Marxists refer to
as fetishized commodities, they are often loathe to consider the fact that within capitalist society, all
value originates in the sphere of production and that one of the primary roles of schools is to serve
as agents or functionaries of capital.