Sentences with phrase «as warm reviews»

His performance as reporter David Lipsky is part of a two - hander and is getting almost as warm reviews as Segel's.

Not exact matches

Reviewing the Best Body Hair Trimmers As men, our body hair can help to keep us warm and make us feel more like a man.

But for now, go read this warm review of Shop Class as Soulcraft, by Slate «s Michael Agger!

• The stepfather - child relationship is substantially more challenging than the biological - father - child relationship: the relationship is not as close; stepfathers are less affectionate and more coercive with stepchildren; and stepchildren tend to be less warm and affectionate with stepfathers — even in long - term fairly successful stepfamilies (for review see Radhakrishna et al, 2001).

All the other reviews for the Avent warmer criticize it as not having any form of automatic timer or temperature sensor.

Most humidifier for baby reviews mentions Holmes as one of the top makers of humidifier, whether it is a cool or warm mist humidifier.

Having a look at bottle sterilizer reviews as well as bottle warmer reviews can give you an amazing inside look into what the product is actually like; by real people who have actually bought it and tried it.

As part of the Spending Review 2010, the Government announced a significant reduction in total funding for Warm Front to # 100m in 2012/13.

As Cameron patronisingly told him in the warm - up for the spending review: «If you have not got a plan, you can not attack a plan.»

As the world warms, we will have to review all manner of basic assumptions to keep flood protection measures robust, says Jim Hall

Warming continued unabated, as established by multiple independent data sets from around the world, and numerous studies in peer - reviewed journals.

The report, written and reviewed by leading U.S. scientists as part of the National Climate Assessment, reinforces that warming temperatures and extreme weather around the globe are «extremely likely» to be the result of carbon pollution from human activities.

Breaking the gridlock on global warming, which will make it easier for these countries to do even more in the future, will require less intrusive approaches, such as flexible commitments and peer review.

The analysis uses methods that have already been peer - reviewed, including examining the change in occurrence of such extreme rains in the historical record and in climate models, as well as using finer - scale regional climate models to compare the current climate to one without warming.

In addition, New peer - reviewed scientific studies now predict a continued lack of global warming for up to three decades as natural climate factors dominate.

International review finds that protected areas are good for adaptation to global warming as well as preventing overfishing and pollution

At risk of going beyond the theme of this thread, I offer up excerpts from it because I think Orr's review speaks indirectly to the larger issue of how we as humans and as a global society are reacting to the findings of the earth sciences regarding anthropogenic global warming, climate disruption, and their ensuing ecological and socio - economic consequences:

A systematic review into the efficacy of static stretching as part of a warm - up for the prevention of exercise - related injury.

The Great Awokening — Autostraddle, a website for lesbian and queer women, had published a warm review of the Seth Rogen adult cartoon Sausage Party... The taco aside, Hogan's post included a forthright account of her site's critical practices, using as an...

Adult Dating Sites Reviewed The Great Awokening — Autostraddle, a website for lesbian and queer women, had published a warm review of the Seth Rogen adult cartoon Sausage Party... The taco aside, Hogan's post included a forthright account of her site's critical practices, using as an... GOT IT.

Asghar Farhadi's film has already been reviewed for the site by Jansen, but as I wanted to see it badly since Cannes (and also because Blue is the Warmest Colour is one of the hardest films to get into this year) I took the chance to catch it.

You might as well review global warming, or Bill Gates's balance sheet.

So far, the reviews for Kevin Macdonald's «State of Play» seem uniformly warm — which comes as a relief to me after the rather indifferent vibe I got from the film's entire marketing strategy.

As I say in my video review (click the link above to watch), I didn't warm to this story simply because my name is in the title, though that helped make it a must - see when I caught up with it in Telluride.

Tracking young Mason (Ellar Coltrane) from childhood to college, the near - three - hour picture «feels much less like a greatest hits package and more analogous to being in the moment,» according to Rodrigo Perez's review, proving to be «warm, soulful, funny and quietly insightful,» and something of a crowning achievement for the filmmaker, feeling «disarmingly light on its feet, sweet, funny and playful in the early years not unlike the director's movies about kids, but as they mature, so does the movie.»

As a warm - up activity each day, a teacher reviews the «sh» sound and students brainstorm words with this spelling pattern to add to the Phonemic Word Wall.

The performance it gives is a real surprise, it manages 0 - 60 in 7 seconds not the 8 plus quoted by Honda — I suspect after reading other reviews with similar results that Honda understate the performance of the 1.5 as it's truly a warm hatch and a lot cheaper than the Type - R.

As an author myself, I know the warm glow that comes from spotting a new review of one of your books.

DmC: Devil May Cry received warm reviews, but sales weren't able to come anywhere near Devil May Cry 4's success, while series fans lamented the new interpretations of the characters, as well as the easier difficulty and greater focus on cinematics and platforming.

However, with a peer review system, it is not possible to take the second option and as a result, the dangers of anthropogenic global warming have gone by default.

My studies in 70s & 80s using rainfall data series over different parts of the globe matches the drought conditions over different parts — which was attributed to global warming by WMO and sent my response to Secretary General of WMO as those of my publications are with WMO library [book was reviewed by the Vice-President of Agrometeorology group in WMO].

Secondly, the argument that the climate should have naturally «rebounded» with warming during the 20th century defies the actual peer - reviewed scientific studies which, as discussed earlier, suggest that the climate should have actually cooled during the 20th century, not warmed, if natural factors were primarily at play.

This is a peer reviewed paper by respected scientists who are saying that aerosol forcing means that the majority of the warming caused by existing co2 emission has effectively been masked thus far, and that as aerosols remain in the atmosphere for far shorter a duration of time than co2, we will have already most likely crossed the 2 degree threshold that the G8 politicians have been discussing this week once the cooling effect of aerosols dissipate.

Weart is best known to Dot Earth regulars as the author of the essential guide to 100 years of research pointing to a human influence on climate, «The Discovery of Global Warming» (here's my 2003 review of that book for The Times).

Numerous «real» scientists conducting «real» scientific research on global warming, whose results are published in «real» peer - reviewed journals, have been quoted in interviews as characterizing their own research as «alarming».

As the market for coal goes global (see our piece in Boston Review on this issue, September 2009) the future of global warming will depend on the interests in the countries that are least interested in slowing global warming.

I've read the guest post from Peter Minnet but as far as I know the experimental data, while interesting, is not yet part of a peer reviewed study.So I'm not aware of solid evidence that CO2 directly warms the ocean.

In fact they have proven the opposite since the sceptics, with some exceptions, nailed it within 70 minutes whereas the peer reviewed Hockey Stick graph remained as the IPCC's prime «evidence» of catastrophic warming for years before being accepted as mathematically fraudulent.

Other than studies detailing anthropogenic forcings for present global warming, are there well - document, peer - reviewed, well - accepted studies showing that are other factors at work as well?

The National Climatic Data Center has released its review of worldwide sea surface temperatures for August and for the stretch from June through August and finds that both the month and the «summer» (as looked at from the Northern Hemisphere) were the warmest at least since 1880, when such records were first systematically compiled.

Everyone can see that you are the one who has been unable to 1) cite any peer reviewed science that empirically falsified the null climate hypothesis of natural climate variability as the continued primary cause of climate warming, and 2) cite any peer reviewed science that empirically shows that anthropogenic CO2 was the primary cause of the late 20th century warming.

And as well, peer reviewed science empirically shows that the amount of solar radiation reaching the earth's surface increasing by 2.7 W / m ² to 6.8 W / m ² during the late 20th century warming.

In 2011, the Global Warming Policy Foundation's website ran the headline «900 + Peer - Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism Of «Man - Made» Global Warming (AGW) Alarm,» listing more than 900 papers which, according to the GWPF, refute «concern relating to a negative environmental or socio - economic effect of AGW, usually exaggerated as catastrophic.»

(infamous DENIER David Evans) * The line of Empirical Evidence (peer reviewed, published, replicated) that humans are causing global warming is as follows:.

Yet another clown dancing dodge by Robert, who can't cite a single peer reviewed paper that empirically shows anthropogenic CO2 has been the primary cause of the late 20th century warming as your climate cult claims.

10: Given that the authors of the largest ever survey of peer - reviewed opinion in learned papers marked only 64 of 11,944 papers, or 0.5 %, as stating they agreed with the official «consensus» proposition that recent warming was mostly manmade, on what rational, evidence - based, scientific ground is it daily asserted that «97 % of scientists» believe recent global warming is not only manmade but dangerous?

But you can NOT support your claims with empirical data, because just as I pointed out, and you have failed to refute, there isn't a single peer reviewed paper that empirically shows that anthropogenic CO2 was the primary cause of the late 20th century warming like your climate alarmist religion claims.

This is because over the past three years, hundreds of new scientific field accounts of global warming's impacts, as well as improved peer - reviewed analyses of global warming itself in both the deep past and the very near future, have depicted earth's atmosphere as far more «sensitive» to the invisible CO2, methane and other human - sourced greenhouse gases than had been hoped.

''... originally Poptech listed this list as «450 Peer - Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of «Man - Made» Global Warming» as seen in numerous blogger websites (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here).

Also global heat content of the ocean (which constitutes 85 % of the total warming) has continued to rise strongly in this period, and ongoing warming of the climate system as a whole is supported by a very wide range of observations, as reported in the peer - reviewed scientific literature.