Sentences with phrase «as warming in the pipeline»

It is also known as warming in the pipeline.

David (# 29) and Gaz (# 30): In another discussion Barry has said that global surface temperatures have indeed levelled out (while cautioning that this ignores factors such as warming in the pipeline).

Not exact matches

As has been the case with the Keystone pipeline, in New York the opposition comes from those concerned about global warming.

Since temperatures are already raised and there is more warming in the pipeline, who is to say that CO2 will adjust downwards as opposed to temperatures adjusting upwards.

The Kia Ceed at this point then is hardly an evo - centric car, but then as opposed to the influx of compact SUVs, and with the possibility of a warmer future offering in the pipeline, we'll take one of these over a dull compact SUV any day.

If we have had 1C of warming (giss) since pre-industrial and human made aerosols are masking between 0.5 and 1.1 (Samset et al) and there is warming «in the pipeline» as well — has the possibility of a 1.5 C target already passed?

If we knew ocean heat uptake as well as we know atmospheric temperature change, then we could pin down fairly well the radiative imbalance at the top of the atmosphere, which would give us a fair indication of how much warming is «in the pipeline» given current greenhouse gas concentrations.

The current energy imbalance at the surface (as demonstrated by the increasing heat content of the oceans) implies there is at least a further 0.5 deg C surface warming in the «pipeline».

Further warming from the present increases are still «in the pipeline» as they say.

There's still plenty of global warming and centuries of coastal retreats in the pipeline, so this is hardly a «benign» situation, as some have cast it.

But aren't these way too low, since LOTI shows we are — as of 2017 — already around 0.95 C warmer than the 1951 - 1980 average, and there is more warming «in the pipeline» because of the time lag, and another (estimated) 0.5 C warming when the anthropogenic aerosols dimming effect is removed?

That could easily be 50 %, which means that even if atmospheric CO2 levels off today, there's as much warming in the pipeline as we've already seen.

More warming is in the pipeline as the climate system slowly responds to the higher CO2 concentrations.

As you said in your presentation, a substantial fraction of the warming from greenhouse gases still sits in the pipeline or is compensated by aerosols.

Anyway warming in the pipeline means even if we stop now there is more to come, and this has been known for at least several IPCC reports and a decade, and that is because the forcing has not all been realized yet as warming.

Alarmists, embarrassed by the earth's refusal to warm as their models predict, have concocted all sorts of scary stories about «warming in the pipeline,» etc..

If they are going to argue that the vast bulk of the warming is «in the pipeline», it seems like the probably of that being 20 or 30 or 40 is just as high, because all the extra heat is wound up in some spring somewhere ready to let loose at some unknown point in the future.

Since temperatures are already raised and there is more warming in the pipeline, who is to say that CO2 will adjust downwards as opposed to temperatures adjusting upwards.

You're beside yourself seeing the church of carbon sin come falling down like a house of cards from the pause and now you're seeing both your warmist heroes and skeptic enemies who are top shelf climate scientists agree that heat diffused into the deep ocean isn't «heat in the pipeline» that will reemerge as rapid global warming.

Let's assume that the theoretical 0.26 C atmospheric warming is correct, but that it went into the upper ocean (top 500 meters), where it is hiding to come back out again as added warming some day (as James E. Hansen has suggested with his «hidden in the pipeline» postulation).