Sentences with phrase «as whether the child»

As part of this survey, primary caregivers of children aged three years and older completed a 10 - item Behavioral Problem Index (such as whether the child was «disobedient» or «mean to others») was «often,» «sometimes» or «not» true.

Each unit revolved around a short piece of engaging informational text, covering topics such as whether children watch too much television and a soccer program in Africa.

Alice Bradbury and Guy Roberts - Holmes, of University College London Institute of Education, who undertook research with teachers after the original trials, say many factors could have skewed the results, such as whether the child was summer born, spoke English as a first language, or had settled happily into school.

That professional can quickly either assist with, or make, parenting decisions, such as whether a child should attend a special event on an upcoming weekend.

NFP showed a favorable effect on the number of child behavioral / parental coping problems in the physician's record35 but an unfavorable / ambiguous effect on the child's resistance to eating.49 HFA did not show any effects on health outcomes such as whether the child was anxious or withdrawn, 50 and EHS did not show an effect on 2 outcomes: child's health status and percentage of parents reporting children with fair or poor health.51, 52 Outcomes on health behaviors or other health outcomes were not reported in the research on the remaining programs.

Behaviours such as whether children work or play among classmates in a manner that is active or passive, cooperative or argumentative, helpful or demanding, may have important consequences for children's relationships with peers and teachers.

It's rare that things go this far, but when there are major issues, such as whether a child should go to a French or English school, or whether a child should go to a public or private school, it can be difficult for either parent to compromise.

Not exact matches

«Whether this is a dedicate gamer who doesn't want to stop playing Mario or Zelda, or whether it's a child experiencing these franchises for the very first time, we believe the value proposition as well as the compelling content is what's fueling our momentum,» Reggie Fils - Aime, president of Nintendo of America, told FWhether this is a dedicate gamer who doesn't want to stop playing Mario or Zelda, or whether it's a child experiencing these franchises for the very first time, we believe the value proposition as well as the compelling content is what's fueling our momentum,» Reggie Fils - Aime, president of Nintendo of America, told Fwhether it's a child experiencing these franchises for the very first time, we believe the value proposition as well as the compelling content is what's fueling our momentum,» Reggie Fils - Aime, president of Nintendo of America, told Fortune.

There's a high demand for babysitting and childcare services, whether it's regularly picking up and dropping off children at school for two - parent working families or accompanying a family on a trip as a childcare provider.

«Now it depends solely on your good sense and your way of life whether you die as an ordinary musician, utterly forgotten by the world, or as a famous kapellmeister, or whom posterity will read... whether, captured by some woman, you die bedded on straw in an attic full of starving children, or whether, after a Christian life spent in contentment, honor, and renown, you leave this world with your family well provided for and your name respected by all.»

Whether they're hauling parcels or children, cargo bikes are becoming a familiar sight in German cities as the nippy, clean alternative to cars and delivery vans — and shaking up urban transport in the process.

Whether that's through God's Word, through prayer or through the encouragements of others around you, staking your claim as a child of God not only pushes the enemy back, but takes you closer to God.

Consciously or unconsciously, the movement also validates an insight which sociologists confirm: The best predictor of whether a child will remain religious as an adult is not the religiosity of the mother — for children tend to take that for granted — but of the father, because he is not expected to be religious.

The interview format used by the Oliner team had over 450 items and consisted of six main parts: a) characteristics of the family household in which respondents lived in their early years, including relationships among family members; b) parental education, occupation, politics, and religiosity, as well as parental values, attitudes, and disciplinary approaches; c) respondent's childhood and adolescent years - education, religiosity, and friendship patterns, as well as self - described personality characteristics; d) the five - year period just prior to the war — marital status, occupation, work colleagues, politics, religiosity, sense of community, and psychological closeness to various groups of people; if married, similar questions were asked about the spouse; e) the immediate prewar and war years, including employment, attitudes toward Nazis, whether Jews lived in the neighborhood, and awareness of Nazi intentions toward Jews; all were asked to describe their wartime lives and activities, whom they helped, and organizations they belonged to; f) the years after the war, including the present — relations with children and personal and community — helping activities in the last year; this section included forty - two personality items comprising four psychological scales.

Gay and lesbian couples should be supported in their role as parents, whether their children come from previous heterosexual relationships, adoption or artificial insemination.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

It's after a report says half of couples don't take time before their wedding day to discuss vital issues such as where they'll live or whether they'll have children.

Every other method ranks below these, including Withdrawal (4.0), Female condom (5.0), Diaphragm (6.0), Periodic abstinence (calendar)(9.0), the Sponge (9.0 - 20.0, depending on whether the woman using it has had a child in the past), Cervical cap (9.0 - 26.0, with the same caveat as the Sponge), and Spermicides (18.0).

The divine fatherhood, true religion as filial relationship with God, God's cosmic goodwill to all his children whether deserving or not, (Luke 6:35 - 36; Matthew 5:45 - 48.)

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackChildren Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

Such children, she contends, should be permitted to live out their ambiguity until they reach maturity and then be permitted to decide whether they want to be male or female, or continue as hermaphrodites.

God finds it comforting, just as you would if your children wanted to figure out how you do things... whether it be baking a cake or building a computer.

And this means that, as a quite concrete historical condition, the only choice that remains for the children of post-Christian culture is not whom to serve, but whether to serve Him whom Christ has revealed or to serve nothing — the nothing.

Don't you think God loves us at least as much as a good parent who delights in the activities of her children, regardless of whether they get everything right?

now I liken this passage to what God said concerning the priest in the book of Numbers 18th chapter he said that their inheritance was of the tithes of the children of Israel and so too me its right on point as too those who are chosen by God whether Pastor, Evangelist or Apostle etc..

Item: the film clearly portrays Llewyn as considering whether to spontaneously take the off - ramp to Akron, where he has every reason to think his two - year old child is.

But don't they all have to do with how we relate to each other and to Jesus Christ — whether we relate vertically as child to parent, as serf to free person, as baron to king, as alien to citizen, as tribal member to colonial usurper, as subject - wife to master - husband, as Third World country to powerful nation, as sharecropper to landed gentry, as migrant laborer to union or employer, as novice nun to mother superior, as female to male, as poor parishioner to monsignor - pastor, and on and on; or whether we relate horizontally as the grown - up heir now equal to his father, as world citizen to world citizen, as worker to worker, as minister to minister, as partner wife to partner husband, as sister to sister, and sister to brother?

It is urgent because it foregrounds the question of whether we would have been better off with a women's movement that respected the family, the complementarity of men and women, and the satisfactions of having and raising children — or, alternatively, with a form of feminism that derides men as oppressors and champions alternate sexualities.

These were people undetectable by the casual observer but secretly organized in rings or cults dedicated to the violation of children, whether recreationally or as stipulated by satanic rites.

Such children are disadvantaged whatever the income of their parents and whether their trouble is defined as mental illness or something else.

You're right, Your Answer, what should not matter is whether it was a «couple» having the children as much as the fact that they (gays and lesbians) chose to have them in the first place by whatever means.

In 1999, we are no longer reduced to «guessing» whether he was inspired or speaking only as a man: • adultery has lost its moral significance and become commonplace; • chastity has become a symbol of unhealthy development; • contraception in expectation of fornication is taught to children in the schools; • respect between the sexes has been replaced by mutual exploitation and / or competition; • marriage has lost its sacramental nature and its enduring promise; • statistically, divorce is common, teenage pregnancy is widespread, single parent and serially parented families increase, sexual disease is epidemic, intercourse is recreational, abortion is ubiquitous.

Whether he dealt with women, children, or slaves, whether the persons in need were Jew, Roman, Syro - Phoenician, or Samaritan, whether he associated with «respectable» people or social outcasts, whether he was illustrating true neighborliness by the story of the good Samaritan or declaring the principle of divine judgment on the basis of «as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren» — all persons were of equal and supreme worth to him because he saw them through the eyes Whether he dealt with women, children, or slaves, whether the persons in need were Jew, Roman, Syro - Phoenician, or Samaritan, whether he associated with «respectable» people or social outcasts, whether he was illustrating true neighborliness by the story of the good Samaritan or declaring the principle of divine judgment on the basis of «as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren» — all persons were of equal and supreme worth to him because he saw them through the eyes whether the persons in need were Jew, Roman, Syro - Phoenician, or Samaritan, whether he associated with «respectable» people or social outcasts, whether he was illustrating true neighborliness by the story of the good Samaritan or declaring the principle of divine judgment on the basis of «as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren» — all persons were of equal and supreme worth to him because he saw them through the eyes whether he associated with «respectable» people or social outcasts, whether he was illustrating true neighborliness by the story of the good Samaritan or declaring the principle of divine judgment on the basis of «as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren» — all persons were of equal and supreme worth to him because he saw them through the eyes whether he was illustrating true neighborliness by the story of the good Samaritan or declaring the principle of divine judgment on the basis of «as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren» — all persons were of equal and supreme worth to him because he saw them through the eyes of God.

In my opinion as a gun owner I feel everyone whether its a fully automatic machine gun or a BB gun everyone should have to have a check to see if they have a mental illness that would prevent them from owning a gun and I would not have a problem having that done to me and when it comes down to evangelicals speaking out every child of GOD needs to be heard.

I do not ever think this will be «morally acceptable» to us as long as we are humans and can relate to that parent or child, understanding that we are just like they are and through empathy and a chemical in our bodies called oxytocin we can walk a mile in their shoes and decide whether that promotes human growth (moral) or stunts it (immoral).

«As chaplain to a group of disabled children travelling to Lourdes with HCPT he was as happy speaking with them as with any able bodied person, and thrived on the levelling which Lourdes offers: it doesn't matter how old you are or whether you can walk or speak, you still have value and wortAs chaplain to a group of disabled children travelling to Lourdes with HCPT he was as happy speaking with them as with any able bodied person, and thrived on the levelling which Lourdes offers: it doesn't matter how old you are or whether you can walk or speak, you still have value and wortas happy speaking with them as with any able bodied person, and thrived on the levelling which Lourdes offers: it doesn't matter how old you are or whether you can walk or speak, you still have value and wortas with any able bodied person, and thrived on the levelling which Lourdes offers: it doesn't matter how old you are or whether you can walk or speak, you still have value and worth.

Having thought carefully and well, Christians today must emulate their Lord in standing up for the frail dignity of humanity, whether the unborn child, the victim of religious persecution, or the homecoming king» the boy who in his death, as in his final touchdown run, passed alone into his rest, uncaught, with no foe left to pursue.

She has both her Masters in Theology and a Masters in Education, and yet she writes: «I am in a very difficult and life - threatening marital situation and it is imperative that my children and I get to safety as soon as possible (before I become a statistic of domestic violence)...» For her the ethical choice is clear whether to live on in a farcical and dangerous relationship so as to serve the demands made on her by society... or to protect herself and her children.

And, in our relationship to the natural world, short - term exploitation of the earth's bounty becomes our birthright, whether or not its result for our children might be shortages of life - sustaining resources such as topsoil and potable water.

While I in fact acknowledge that there is no way that a devout Jew can really understand Edith's willingness to embrace the Cross of Christ just as Edith's mother could not understand her child's Christian faith, all of us people of good will, be we Jewish or Christian, can acknowledge our common tie to the mystery of God's redemption that began with the covenant with Abraham, continued and was solidified in the exodus, and is with us today, whether we are still awaiting the promised messiah or believe that he has already come and is among us now.

We might wonder, for example, whether any mother should ever love her child as the tree does the boy — giving the child whatever he wants.

Would you allow him to Choose whether he would want to get close to a baby knowing it was conceived within an affair, and that the biological father and his parents may wish to also be part of the childs life and he'd have to accommodate them as well?

Loving perception, whether as between sweethearts or as between parents and children, produced kinds of knowledge that were not available to nonlovers.

But the jury is out as to whether the child is more «radically self» or «radically other».

A Brief Inquiry Into the Meaning of Sin and Faith, With «On My Religion» by John Rawls Harvard, 275 pages, $ 27.95 To read A Brief Inquiry is to be led to ponder whether, as Wordsworth wrote, the child is father of the man.

Nor can those Americans who actually serve, whether in the army proper or in any enterprise connected to their country's defense, have quite so immediate and close - quartered a connection as do Israel's soldiers to the wives and children and parents and friends they are called upon to defend.

Process thought has much to offer in suggesting a sound perspective on the principles that should govern the work of — as it should also determine the approach to — education both of the young, whether they be children or adolescents, and of adults who are enrolled in institutions of higher learning or in other ways participate in what appropriately is called the educational process.

Whether we do it as part of a church ritual or not is another question — my wife and I and two of our children were all baptised as adults at separate times in the sea by friends and family, and one child only in a church ritual.

Also, if one would read Genesis - Malachi then one would know these question asked by Smithsonian, how we were created, and why evil came about, and to help, YHWH made us for His own sake unconditionally; He gave us a choice to decide with our own hearts what, or who we want to be in this world, as well as to who we'll be to HIM, whether being righteous, obedient children, or not the choice is ours we're responsible for our own righteousness in Ezekiel 14:14 - 21.

Whether they were or not is not the issue — the issue is your attempt to link being gay and being a child predator as one and the same.