Sentences with phrase «as wikipedia article»
As the wikipedia article on the tradition mentions, this act of intentional waste has expanded to not just occur following football victories, but has become a way «to celebrate anything good that happens concerning Auburn.»
https://www.treehugger.com/
You may as well as ask a random stranger on the street, they know as much as wikipedia article writers!
Not exact matches
As an aside, perhaps just one important indicator, the maker of this rule, though wikipedia predicts an eventual Nobel, is a nutcase, full of rational expectations, promoting a flat income tax, and arguing against fiscal stimulus (see WSJ article below).
But that also works on trust, because anyone could use www.google.com as the link able text and instead point you to a handy article on wikipedia, like this one: www.google.com
US White nationalists are controversial because their ideologies are close to those of the KKK and the Nazis, as spelt out in the Criticism section of the wikipedia article on the topic.
Turkey using as an excuse the treaty of guarantee, invaded, occupied and still has under its control a part of a foreign Sovereign Nation (Republic of Cyprus) The article of wikipedia is relatively un-biased and has good sources on the legitimacy of this military invasion The main reason this act was an illegal invasion was that the treaty...
No mention of it in the article... I see the Renegade Kid wikipedia page has it listed as 2015, but Nintendo's own page has the release date still listed as Q4 2014 and I'm sure that isn't true.
You shouldn't use wikipedia as a soure, William Colony has editted all the articles, or at least most of them and we can't know what is true and what isn't anymore.
This is part of the article from (the not very accurate) wikipedia: «The objectives of the HAARP project became the subject of controversy in the mid-1990s, following claims that the antennae could be used as a weapon.
Making his pitch in the UK Constitutional Law Blog, he lamented that the wikipedia article on the UK constitution, first port of call for many a lay person (and law student in a hurry), «would not pass a peer review process for an academic journal and nor would it receive a good mark as an undergraduate essay (though I suspect it has been cut and pasted into some over the years)».
The average 20 - something likely reads («scans» is a better word) tons of short Internet stuff such as this article, instant messages, text messages, RSS and wikipedia snippets but how much time do those same individuals spend reading a novel without distraction.