One step that schools should take is to discourage suspensions and expulsions for more subjective infractions such
as willful defiance.
Not exact matches
Due to data showing disproportionate suspensions of black and Latino students, OUSD banned «
willful defiance» and «disruptive behavior»
as categories for suspensions in 2015 and allocated millions to helping schools adopt more restorative approaches.
At the time of AB420's signing by Governor Jerry Brown,
willful defiance was the most common offense for out - of - school suspensions, particularly for minority students.2 However, its use was already in decline,
as several districts, including Los Angeles and San Francisco, had previously taken steps to limit expulsions and out - of - school suspensions, regardless of the grade, for
willful defiance.3
The San Francisco and Los Angeles Unified School Districts have both struck down their
willful defiance rules
as grounds for suspension, citing concerns that suspensions under this rule disproportionately affect minority students.
Suspensions for
willful defiance — defined by state law
as disrupting school activities or otherwise defying school staff — dropped 79 percent among African - Americans.
In recent years the state Legislature has outlawed suspensions for
willful defiance of school authorities and disruption for grades K - 3
as data have overwhelmingly showed that these suspensions are disproportionately meted out to students of color and those with disabilities.
Unfinished Agenda on School Discipline A California assemblyman is once again trying to curb expulsions and suspensions for what's known
as «
willful defiance,» when kids act out or misbehave in class or during school activities.
Morales, whose school is very small and reports few to no suspensions and expulsions, pointed to a misunderstanding of what
willful defiance is, poor implementation of the new policy, inadequate training, and a shared commitment to the philosophy behind the ban
as the source of most staff dissatisfaction.
They suggest that «teachers who are unaware of the dynamics of complex trauma can easily mistake its manifestations
as willful disobedience,
defiance, or inattention, leading them to respond to it
as though it were mere «misbehavior»» (p. 36).
The Los Angeles Unified School District will stop using «
willful defiance»
as a justification for suspension, a sweeping change that eliminates the broad category
as an option for teachers and administrators.
Parents pushed for the ban,
as «
willful defiance» suspensions are disproportionately applied to at - risk students, such
as students of color, english language learners, and students with disabilities
As part of the long list of violations that could lead to a student's suspension in LAUSD schools before 2013, «willful defiance» was targeted as the most vague and subjective reason for taking a student out of clas
As part of the long list of violations that could lead to a student's suspension in LAUSD schools before 2013, «
willful defiance» was targeted
as the most vague and subjective reason for taking a student out of clas
as the most vague and subjective reason for taking a student out of class.
Parents pushed for the ban,
as «
willful defiance» suspensions are disproportionately applied to at - risk students, such
as students of color, english language learners, and students with disabilities (ACLU, 2015).
Willful defiance is described in the California Education Code
as: «Disrupted school activities or otherwise willfully defied the valid authority of supervisors, teachers, administrators, school officials, or other school personnel engaged in the performance of their duties» (Cal.