Sentences with phrase «as written proof»

Vaccinations Your pet must be fully up to date on vaccines and valid Vaccination Certificates or Titre Test Certificates issued by your veterinarian must be submitted as written proof.

Not exact matches

The company wrote that the fundraising started with them donating MXN $ 50,000, which will be added to the total amount of donations.The amount the company has raised and the transaction proof will be publicly displayed for total transparency.Bitso emphasized that although the Mexican Red Cross will ultimately receive the funds, user contributions can not be used as tax deductions.

If you want to write for large websites such as Entrepreneur, Success, Forbes, Fast Company, Inc. and so on, you're going to need some writer social proof.

Rainbows (as attributed to god) are proof that god didn't need to have the bible written in order to communicate to the whole world, almost insytantly, and almost daily if needed.

The story of a resuurection is not proof of anything, as the story you've been told since birth was NOT recorded by anyone who was there, rather it was FINALLY written down 2 generations after the so - called «fact».

It was written by many people over the span of hundreds of years, it is tribal rules from the infancy of our development and arguably is not a good book at all but full of hatred, spite and unspeakable violence, and you arent allowed to use «faith» as your proof of existence... faith is nothing less than the throwing away of reason i.e. belief without evidence.

And so the evidence that Christians continue to present as «proof» of their god is either the earliest fragments of these same man - written stories (proving nothing other than that someone wrote the stories down!)

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

You may not know this, but lots of god believers actually point to an old book, which was obviously written by people promoting a religious idea, as proof of what their god said.

The thing is, how do we as humans have a kind of absolutely irrefutable proof without referring to a book written by some men 2000 + years ago?

What is the basis for demanding proof of something such as faith when one does not know what is even written or that it is meant to work the other way around?

Luke had been at pains to make clear that the risen Jesus was no otherworldly spirit but a physical form with flesh and bones, 42 who consequently presented his disciples with infallible proofs.41 The risen Christ came to be regarded as having conducted a fresh ministry with his disciples, and in these forty days he «taught them about the kingdom of God».41 But since the experience of the risen Christ was not of this character at the end of the century when Acts was written, it had to be made clear that this kind of experience was brought to an end by a new event, the Ascension.

This freedom allows people such as yourself to post and allows me to write back to you, that I believe your comments to be pure ramblings, without any shred of proof to your assertions.

This writing is considered proof of the historical man Jesus of Nazareth as understood by people of his time.

And the unique impression of Jesus upon mankind, whose name is not so much written as ploughed into the history of this world, is proof of the subtle virtue of this infusion.»

The world has grown up from 2000 years ago, when you could state back then: «He walked on water» and parted the «Red Sea» and the authors of these stories wrote them 50 - 1000 years after the perceived events, along with unverifiable evidence as proof.

No lesser a Christian than Martin Luther understood our predicament: Anyone, he wrote in ìOn Temporal Authority, î who tried ìto rule the world by the gospel and to abolish all temporal law and the sword on the plea that all are baptized and Christian, and that, according to the gospel, there shall be among them no law or sword» or the need for either»... would be loosing the ropes and chains of the savage wild beasts and letting them bite and mangle everyone, meanwhile insisting that they were harmless, tame, and gentle creatures; but I would have the proof in my wounds.î I do not believe that Hauerwas sees America's enemies as harmless, tame, and gentle creatures.

The only «proof» of a higher power comes from a book written by people as confused and as scared as we are.

Given I and millions have personally experienced these transforming truths as written in the Bible and given there is no proof that anything in the Bible is not as presented there is no logical reason to doubt the Bible is not the word of God translated so that we can begin the journey.

In 1837, the first editor of Washington's Collected Works wrote: «If a man who spoke, wrote, and acted as a Christian through a long life, who gave numerous proofs of his believing himself to be such, and who was never known to say, write, or do a thing contrary to his professions, if such a man is not to be ranked among the believers of Christianity, it would be impossible to establish the point by any train of reasoning.»

There is no room to dilute this fact with agnostic thinking, or claims for lack of proof as it is written in God's word, and a sign for everyone.

In the absence of proof that the God so confidently invoked by the orthodox bishop really exists in the world, perhaps Merrick in his last moments is yet attempting, in his confused way, to «Follow the way by which [others] began,» as Pascal wrote, accepting the sacraments, discipline and consolations of the church and now imitating Christ's death as if he believed in their efficacy.

In fact, four centuries after Muhammad's death, some Muslim writers, like Abu Nu`aym al - Isfahani and Ahmad al - Bayhaqi, expanded a genre of Muslim writing, Dalā» il al - nubuwwa (The Signs of Prophethood), detailing extensive accounts of metaphysical miracles attributed to Muhammad as proofs of his prophethood.

Without SEX, we would not have our BEAUTIFUL, PRECIOUS off spring... CHRISTIANS are FAKE, and use their christianity as cover ups... PROVE TO ME GOD wrote this bible, NO PROOF, only what we were raised to believe... How many «christians» you know, leave church and go smoke a butt, drink, or even go to strip clubs... Hmmmmmmm I KNOW PLENTY!!!! Enougb said!!

Whether Piltdown Man or Brontosaurus, the errors may be later written off, but in their times each is respectively held up as an undeniable proof that the model is both correct and sufficient.

Another device is to make a donation in the form of a trust which becomes irrevocable only in case of the death of the donor; in this case the parties concerned are made to sign a written document as proof of their consent.

It is interesting in saying you do not believe in Man - God — a tale made up and written down as proof — and that because there is something big i.e. the universe — somehow there has to be something bigger — Man - God and if you do not believe this you think «You are big» i.e. akin to a super-natural being is a logic that can only be rational if the basis for logic is irrational.

How is it that what was written in that book can still be claimed as true without any further proof?

These Proofs, including additional variants, are sometimes known as the Quinque Viae, which is Latin for «five ways», because this is how Thomas Aquinas (c. 1227 - 74), the Angelic Doctor whose writing has exercised a profound and lasting influence on Catholic philosophy and theology, summarized them at the opening of his Summa Theologiae.

When you offer their writings, as proof of what they were writing about... just doesn't prove anything.

Which clubs were they and as above, is there written proof of this?

In a world in which beat writers write about prospects regularly to keep up with the churn of the internet, in a world with fantasy leagues that make players scout maternity wards, and in a world in which the last three World Series winners have all served as a proof of concept for developing young stars and keeping them together, the fans agree with the GMs.

It's a rarity, and the appearances themselves usually aren't much to write home about: the whole idea is that someone like Chyna pops into the Rumble to the surprise of everyone, eliminates another wrestler, and then is eliminated themselves right after the pivotal moment that will later appear on DVDs and documentaries and be pointed to as proof of progress being recorded.

Copy editor, staff writer Responsible for copy editing, writing, proofing and layout of news as well as features.

The truth is that most baby proofing books are written as a result of an accident or fatal situation and someone wants to make sure that it doesn't happen to you.

Schneiderman's office is requesting written proof that the ad was discontinued as well as all of the names of staff and personnel responsible for hiring the nurses and nurses» aides, and those responsible for creating the ad.

I suspect there is nothing on the legal side preventing from using a cryptocurrency as it did not even exist when this kind of law was written, but actually I have no proof.

Grisanti helpfully provided a photo of one of his letters, written on his campaign letterhead, as proof that said letter (at least one of them) indeed exists.

As the German astronomer Johann Encke wrote to Le Verrier, «Your name will be forever linked with the most outstanding conceivable proof of the validity of universal gravitation.»

Perhaps this correlates with budding scenario - building minds, writes Suddendorf, even as he cautions that plausibility should not be mistaken for proof.

«With Stalin as his ally, he launched a crusade to discredit work in genetics, in part, because proof of the genetic theory of evolution would expose him as a fraud,» Dugatkin and Trut write.

«These studies,» Shyam Bansal, Ph.D., Sumanth Prabhu, M.D., and colleagues write in the journal Circulation: Heart Failure, «provide important proof - of - concept for T - cells as disease mediators in heart failure.»

Writing in Physical Review Letters, the research team at Southampton has provided the first proof - of - principle demonstration of a new laser cooling technique, based on a proposal by Martin Weitz and Nobel laureate Ted Hänsch in 2000, which is in principle applicable to atoms and molecules as yet untamed by conventional laser cooling.

It was written 70 years before a team of physicists produced the first empirical evidence of this phenomenon, known as the Bose - Einstein condensate, and earned the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physics for providing proof of Einstein's remarkable prescience.

Other cosmologists joined in, including Michael J. Mortonson and Uroš Seljak of the University of California, Berkeley, who wrote their own critical paper, concluding, «It is thus too early to celebrate the BICEP2 results as a definitive proof of inflation.»

The study is «important as a proof - of - principle,» adds human geneticist Daniel MacArthur of the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who himself is on the hunt for rare genes that protect against disease and wrote a commentary accompanying the new paper.

«Our most likely explanation (although we have no proof of this yet) is that healthy humans might be acting as vectors of transcontinental spread,» Floto wrote in an email.

A Postdoctoral Scholar's personnel file (s) contain information related to the individual's appointment at the University, such as: the Postdoctoral Scholar's proof of degree or transcript, Curriculum Vitae, UC's Appointment and Reappointment notices, information about the Postdoctoral Scholar's pay and benefits, record of training, written annual reviews, discipline, and dismissal actions, and other relevant or necessary information specified by the University.

We ask new members to write an article for the website to show their interest in explaining animal research (we can help advise on topics, as well as provide support in editing and proofing any drafts).

Not the gentlest metaphor, but this «beast» is not The China Study itself and certainly is not its well respected author, Dr. Campbell, but is rather the misuse and abuse of statistics and logical inference that has falsely elevated The China Study into proof that, as Dr. Campbell wrote, «Eating foods that contain any cholesterol above 0 mg is unhealthy.»