Sentences with phrase «as wrong comments»

«We equally advise the Diplomatic Community to be neutral on this issue as wrong comments against us will be seen as saboteurs.

Not exact matches

Tim Interesting comments - the miners [and speaking as a miner] have seemed to get it wrong and done so many times over many years resulting in increased cyclic behaviour of their businesses.

A significant portion of the TSC hearing focused on Haldane's now famous Fish comment, as well as broader issues with economic forecasting — something that has come to the fore in the UK since economists were almost unanimously wrong in their predictions about the immediate impact of Brexit on the British economy.

As I recently wrote, Trump's comments about the Fed's decision - making were completely wrong.

In reading some of the comments, I would just like to say that I would rather take a chance of being wrong in my belief in God as well as my faith in Jesus Christ as to be one that says there is no God only to stand before Him in the final judgement to hear the words «depart from me» and be cast into the lake of fire...

And as far as the spineless «R» If taking a stand for commonsense is wrong, it's not Rush Limbaugh comments that will hurt the GOP in the election but their lack of morals.

But if you write an editorial saying promiscuity and contraception are «not sin» then well just as here, I wrote my editorial comment that you are wrong, There are sins and sin is a real thng.

Having being on the receiving end of the «man - hater» comment more times than I can count, seeing it listed as number one — in the form of «I like white males so much I married one» — rubbed me the wrong way.Being called a man - hater is often unfairly used as a way to silence women and dismiss their arguments outright, which is troubling, especially when it happens in the midst of a theological discussion.

My dad and step - mom would make me feel welcome in their actions, but would make weird, negative comments out of no where as if I was doing something wrong?

As Albert once made comment that he hoped his theory would be proven wrong.

As far as I am concerned, most of the comments about the President's faith on this page, and the very topic of this article are what is wrong with ChristianitAs far as I am concerned, most of the comments about the President's faith on this page, and the very topic of this article are what is wrong with Christianitas I am concerned, most of the comments about the President's faith on this page, and the very topic of this article are what is wrong with Christianity.

Unfortunately, this blog comment format isn't adequate for maieutics, which would be the easiest way to show you where exactly you are wrong, as both Davids above.

WHY, as commented by many, IF, the Qur «an states that all the infidels should be wiped out, and this is wrong, and Islam is a religion of peace, have their religious leaders remained silent?

In the light of that then, I think you are wrong to have written the rebuke you had to me about peoples motives as you intrpert my comments to adress.

And as for your comment about the only true doc - umented observations — you are wrong — plain and simple.

As I've read through the comments I've once again been overcome by grief that theses conversations have to exist... that my gay brothers and sisters have to overcome the feeling that there is something wrong with them..

Robert T. Miller of First Things commented that «Wielgus, long ago, did some seriously wrong things, but they were the kinds of bad things that generally good people might do — low - level collaboration, which he probably perceived to be harmless, in exchange for things that in any decent society would have been his by right, such as the ability to travel to pursue his studies.

The judge was wrong to make the comments in the first place and wrong about what he said as well.

But when you single me and or my comment out by name in one of your arrogant speeches about how wrong I am I push back... simple as that.

As to the substance of Mr. Redlich's comment, he is entirely right in his devotion to religious freedom, diversity, and peace, and, in my view, entirely wrong in his idea of how those great goods might be preserved and protected.

Your comment shows your heart, you are not wrong for using the donations / tithes to survive so long as the church books / admin reflect whats going on to be transparent with your givers.

I started to read some of the comments, and as usual it's all about whose right or wrong when it comes to religion and not about the article read.

i long with you david... and i myself stumble in my own awkward efforts toward freedom, and as you said, we know the fact is that it is scary to move into freedom... because it is unknown... but i see so many on this newfound road to freedom get trapped in the liminal space of wish - fullfillment community (which actually rather looks like affinity rather than the hard - won community that comes from communitas)... i'm sure this is going to come off the wrong way, but i'm going to say it anyway: many of the comments seem to be «all about me», and truly that is what religion is... but not freedom, not the mission of Jesus where you die to yourself by taking up your cross daily... not being centered on the «other» rather than yourself...

Update: Since reading other comments on this topic I realised that I was doing 2 things wrong, as I live in the south of Spain with temperaturas over 30ºc at the moment I need to soak the almonds in the fridge not just in the kitchen, plus the bottle I used wasn't airtight.

i could obviously be wrong but it seems like 2 cups flour would work better, however, judging by the previous comments i must have done something wrong as i always triple recipes for my purposes.

As you can see by the comments, a lot of people have had it turn out, and I have been making it for years, so I'm not sure what could have gone wrong.

i hate those who mention cesc in their comment, who is him by the way, is he a god, can someone tell me where will he play in our starting11 or who should we bench so that he can play by the way why bothering mentioning someone who plays for chelsea.we did nt need him and he did nt need us and mou said that, if he realy respect us as you faithful fab fans think then why he has not said anything about that until now.for me arsene was right about that and fab was the one who was wrong for choosing chelsea while he knows that mou will mock us and the manager that he said he respected so much.he is just like other judas who play for our rivals and i will not make a plea if he will be bood at the emirates.

And there comes the coach work, and if it does nt work then the coach got it wrong by not signing other people because in sports, especially at this level, you have to be as arrogant as you can be so comments dotn get to you and you perform well.

Good on Andy Murray for always making sure to correct wrongs such as this and strive for equality in his public comments, but it's 2017 and this shouldn't be an ongoing issue anymore.

Rudiger says he was not injured for the clash at the St Mary's Stadium and has attempted to clarify his comments in an interview with ZDF, translated by the Metro, as he feels Conte may have taken them the wrong way.

I would like to tell arsenal fan that the transfer window is not arsenal's problem.Let explain what is in my mind.We need to reinforce our team but we need to think in the future that most of the high class players are going to refuse signing for arsenal fc because of Mr Wenger's philosophy.It looks like arsenal becomes cemetery of players.How many players came in and left because of performance, became good players out of arsenal.We need to accept all of the transformation Mr wenger brings in arsenal but now it does not work.Why??? because lack of tactics, strategies and pretending best players for Mr wenger mind but in reality those players do not get standard of best player.Mr wenger wants to prove everybody that he is wright that players who are calling by wenger are best.I means Mr wenger is the only one can see all matter in good position or bad.He is wrong by thinking this way.He does not like criticism.he is the mind of arsenal.Everything he can say or defend is wright.Think about morrinho comments about arsenal!!!! Why he likes to be arsenal coach!!!! One thing I want to say about arsenal players, I think everybody watch arsenal games.We have got short mind players who play two good games and the rest shameless.They are working hard in the training ground for catching Mr wenger's mind to let them play; what is behind their (players) mind to be the most regular players.Those players have no vision even ambition; they are never becoming high class and their carriers are going to finish in arsenal after arsenal we are going to see them playing for championship.They do not care to become legend as Ian wright, Vierra, Berckam, piress, Henry... What is the big behind their mind to use wenger name to be selected in national team.They are not able to face different leagues in the world.

It seems you have replied to the wrong article here as many of your comments do not apply, I said nothing of artetas ability, I said coquelin is untouchable in dm, which he is.

i think we can forget about Aubemeyang after his recent comments I hope and wish Im wrong though as I really want him in an Arsenal Shirt

Your comments on Stan are valid but seeing fans who voice discontentment with the status quo as becoming part of the problem is IMO wrong.

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

The forward really came back with a bang after his frustrating spell on the sidelines and Coquelin was quick to point out that Giroud has always proven his many doubters wrong since coming to the club and the English Premier League a few years ago, but in a way these comments could be taken as a proof that perhaps the big man is the perfect player to have on the bench as he will want to come on and prove himself once again.

Perhaps they are right or even wrong but some comments are such that wishes that we had lost the match so as to prove how right they have always been than mere observations.

You saying it's fans like me who are settlers is totally pointless.In my comments I never said I was settling no didn't want change.The way you said «stupid team» and «coach out of his depths» is what I was referring to.In fact I want a change today and I'm tired of seeing thing go on like this so don't come here and pretend like you are the only one who wants a change and think I'm part of those who settle for this.When I also see people predicting Arsenal's positions and they are so certain about it it makes me laugh and think of them as naive.Trust me there's no wrong for a person to predict a team's position but it's naive for a person to be certain about it and people come and quote sayings like «no one knows tomorrow».

Now you come on and spit out your pretty vicious comments as though you are right in your opinion and we who want him removed are not only in the wrong but are only a very few in numbers.THIS IS WHERE I AM CONCERNED FOR YOU.

As none of us know the ins and outs of his personal life, beyond the few comments in this article, it would be wrong to comment on who or what brought him to this low ebb.

And the final comment is clearly rubbish as we've retained the wrong players for too long and are losing the ones we want to keep.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

comment in the wrong place — can't believe this article though, AFC would be far better off without Kroenke, not only in monetary terms, but in management terms as well, in that we may have members on the board who don't mess up transfer deals and run down players contracts.

I said I hope Coquelin has a good game against City and shoves your negative comments up your Arse he did that and not me but 99 percent said of arsenal fans agreed as for watching football to be an expert no wonder you can't see a good player Ya have to play the game to have any idea of quality if I'm a sensationalist then great I had faith in him, and what's wrong with playing for Charlton to get experience Ya don't get it sitting on the bench again you know shit about how clubs use there players Enough of this back an forth crap I will wait till the end of season to see who was right about him CB

Don't get me wrong, as anyone who's read my comments knows, I am a Wenger supporter through and through but nobody's perfect and AW has a real blind spot when it comes to Brits!

@ MYWAY — Harry's comments about the tournament being pointless are wrong, as I've already said it is a very important tournament and everybody in Africa should get the chance to watch their team play for the continental title.

As with the first lot of comments, I can't really see much wrong with what he's said here.

I love to read the comments though that are wrong though, because it is a good commentary on what societies as a whole need to work on... wait... I think you're in Canada?

I don't message or comment much on what you write as I have no personal loss myself, and I don't want to say the wrong thing somehow or offend someone somehow.