Sentences with phrase «as wrong investments»

Also, it is vital to make investments under a financial expert's guidance, as wrong investments are a financial stalemate.

Not exact matches

If you buy at the wrong time, you could lose as much as 80 percent of your investment in a matter of days.

In doing so, we are balancing the improvement in our quantitative measures, as well as our qualitative analysis, against our tolerance for risk (we prefer investment positions that allow us to be dead wrong about everything and still not experience intolerable losses).

ZBB can also raise communication and PR challenges, by sending the wrong signal to employees and markets; as it may be perceived as a recessionary action rather than an investment and marketing strategy.

Investigate and act as soon as you think something is wrong with your investment or account.

What makes my blood boil is the AOB telling me what's wrong with the club, the lack of tactics, player investment etc... but then never come up with ideas that can then be as intensely scrutinized as AOB's are with Wenger.

looking at players as return for investment is wrong.

Actually that Chelsea net spend is wrong: Total spend: # 216.8 m. Sales: # 179.2 m. Net: # 37.6 m This is the correct figure but as said in many posts it dosen't take into account their investment into the squad in the previous years.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

theres something desperatly wrong within the club and I for one feel that Wenger is not the entire casue of the problem but he almost certainly IS a part of it and is complicet with the board in running a well oiled machine as far as finance is concerned but will not risk any major financial outlay in order to achieve what it is in effect there for, TO WIN TROPHIES IN FOOTBALL COMPETITIONS!!!!! Its a sporting club NOT an investment bank for private members as its currently being run

Stan is a sports investment businessman and no doubt a very good one who has profited, in my opinion hill - wood who sold the fans down the river is to blame for selling his shares (along with the rest of the board then - it was only Bracewell - Smith who admitted she sold to the wrong person) wenger as an employee of Arsenal fc has done everything what the club needs ie finish forth, however I do honestly believe with a different more tactically astute manager we would be in a better place now and maybe even won the league last season

A highway construction project hailed by Governor Andrew Cuomo as a «critical investment» was also a glaring example of what New York is doing wrong when it comes to rebuilding its transportation infrastructure.

To arrogate to itself the powers to simply dump people in jail indefinitely is, to say the least, uncivilized and barbaric; to hang serious allegations against a person without proof of evidence, as the judge noted in the case of Senator Bala Mohammed, is malicious, callous and unacceptable; and to constrain citizens with brazen impunity, in defiance of court orders, is to send a wrong signal to Diaspora Nigerians and other foreign investors who, paradoxically, our President and his ministers, have been courting assiduously, that the law can not protect both they and their investments.

According to Turner, ministers are wrong to present this as the biggest rail investment since the Victorian era.

I don't believe that it is wrong, however, and I do appreciate it as an investment in your health.

I believe in investment pieces Don't get me wrong, I love Zara as much as the next girl but some pieces are worth the investment.

I'm going to buy the system, don't get me wrong — it's a neat step forward and nicely, surprisingly, never felt gimmicky — but it just feels like I'm doing it as an investment right now, covering my bases for when the Great Wii U Game — maybe Pikmin 3?

But to generalize beyond this case study that all technology in education is not worth the investment makes no sense and asks the wrong question, as Jonathan Schorr argues persuasively.

All too often the investment into good governance practice is considered as an ill - timed after - thought when things have already started to go wrong.

Timescale matters; size of asset base matters; timing of recognition of investments matters; and Graham and Dodd were wrong anyway, as fifty years of securities research demonstrated pretty conclusively even before the 1987 market hiccups.

What's wrong with the concept that self publishing is a business like any other and as such there are marketing expenses and without this investment, books struggle to sell?

Odd lot theory: An investment theory that contends that as a whole the odd lotters are always wrong.

There's nothing wrong with purchasing low risk investments and then adding more risk to your portfolio as you grow in confidence and experience.

A margin of safety acts as a «buffer» for the long - term investor, protecting one's downside just in case something goes wrong with the business / investment.

As I have pointed out in previous letters, each investment the Fund makes has something wrong with it, and we spend a lot of time trying to figure out what is wrong and worrying about it.

As a tool to bring about greater happiness and freedom, you can't go wrong with more investments in the New Year.

They get basic concepts wrong, as you can read from this paste from their users manual, «Asset allocation is the process of aligning the clients risk tolerances, financial objectives, and time horizon with their investment portfolio.».

Tward says there's nothing wrong with the traditional strategy, which is to gradually move into safer income - producing investments as you get close to retiring.

Which brings us to wrong reason No. 2: Buying as an investment.

This is perhaps one of the hardest things for a value investor to do as you have to first see that the investment thesis isn't playing out early on, then acknowledge that you've been wrong with a timely sale.

We may be wrong if we assume that current markets are at high level Suggest you to make the additional investments as 2 — 3 installments, with a hope that markets give you low NAV in next 3 months.

Wexboy, Reference your 30th Sept current summary in KR1, From my point of view I am in awe of your 2 % holding in KR1, The figures are very compelling and staggering in forward potential, I might have this projection all wrong but here goes, As of today 22/10/17 we have an sp of 7p, quoting your average roi on holdings within the table we have x 15 within the last 7 months giving us a current book to value of x 3.5 = sp 24.5 p, Should we assume another x 15 (I appreciate the x 15 was on the back of Ethereum, s metaphoric rise and other crypto, s tracking) over the next 12 months and and sp follows suit to say 100p, THEN we factor in a us listing and as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, As of today 22/10/17 we have an sp of 7p, quoting your average roi on holdings within the table we have x 15 within the last 7 months giving us a current book to value of x 3.5 = sp 24.5 p, Should we assume another x 15 (I appreciate the x 15 was on the back of Ethereum, s metaphoric rise and other crypto, s tracking) over the next 12 months and and sp follows suit to say 100p, THEN we factor in a us listing and as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, As of today 22/10/17 we have an sp of 7p, quoting your average roi on holdings within the table we have x 15 within the last 7 months giving us a current book to value of x 3.5 = sp 24.5 p, Should we assume another x 15 (I appreciate the x 15 was on the back of Ethereum, s metaphoric rise and other crypto, s tracking) over the next 12 months and and sp follows suit to say 100p, THEN we factor in a us listing and as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, s?

You must hate those as they are a real contradiction in what you feel is wrong in this investment world....

Diversifying allows one to «spread out the the risk» across the overall «bucket» of investments so that if any one individual investment goes horribly wrong then the overall negative impact on the group of investments as a whole is minimized.

What is wrong with filing expenses as investment?

btw I resisted discussing government interference / regulation in my post, because it's just another endless rabbit - hole... but let me just say: i) Investors are silly if they don't anticipate / price in the threat of arbitrary & draconian regulation — specifically from the two usual culprits, China & the US (Jamie Dimon wasn't wrong on that)-- so recent headlines should be no surprise, and ii) I suspect it may not matter in the end — more regulation could certainly hurt / blacklist the sector for some percentage of existing crypto - enthusiasts, but may also endorse the space for a much much larger population to finally consider it as an alternative / investment.

Some capital guaranteed or protected investments are secured against separate assets, whereas with other investments, investors only rank as unsecured creditors if things go wrong.

struggling as i do to stay on top of messy investments & having created this list in the first place, the addition of SLW at the bottom was somehow rubbing my neat - mindedness the wrong way.

Other reasons for the losses could include losing out in competition or making wrong investments, she said in Jakarta on Wednesday, as reported by kompas.com.

I'm going to buy the system, don't get me wrong — it's a neat step forward and nicely, surprisingly, never felt gimmicky — but it just feels like I'm doing it as an investment right now, covering my bases for when the Great Wii U Game — maybe Pikmin 3?

It might be more expensive, but if you're looking at marketing as an expense vs. investment, you have the wrong perspective for this line of work.

The government will force a carbon tax on people and pull more money out of the real economy to spend as they see fit on more Solyndra type investments and when the cold hits and stays proving AGW was dead wrong they will not apologize or refund anything.

This source described Bell Boyd as a firm «on the decline» and wrong - sized at about 250 lawyers, but said the intellectual property and investment management practices remain strong.

It would be like having an accountant acting as your stock market investment advisor; it's simply the wrong specialist handling the wrong specialty.

While there is no such thing as a perfect investment, Bitcoin has proven doubters wrong for years.

Many experts say there's nothing wrong with putting your money in aggressive growth sub-accounts as long as you diversify your investments.

A wise choice is to make sure your leisure travel investments are protected from what can go wrong before and during a trip, such as accidents requiring medical attention, lost baggage and delays.

The emotional trauma due to the loss of Mr.Sharma was added by the dilemma of making decision regarding the huge amount of money received as the death benefit and finally she ended up with a wrong investment in properties due to which she suffered huge financial loss.

Nobody with access to this kind of funds would invest as much in a low probability investment opportunity, or we are wrong?

«It would treat homeownership as a consumption rather than as an investment, and that's wrong,» he says.