Sentences with phrase «as wrong the beliefs»

Not exact matches

Actually, this belief is factually wrong, as the bread and butter for most online brokers does not come from transactional fees.

In reading some of the comments, I would just like to say that I would rather take a chance of being wrong in my belief in God as well as my faith in Jesus Christ as to be one that says there is no God only to stand before Him in the final judgement to hear the words «depart from me» and be cast into the lake of fire...

If you look up blogs for people who were Democrats as youths and in their middle - age switched to Republican (neo-neocon is an excellent example), you'll see that they too were shunned for choosing the «wrong» belief.

I was lucky enough to find the church that accepted me and my beliefs as different from the mainstream but valid and no more right or wrong than anyone else's beliefs.

So, voters have more respect for someone who believes strongly even if the voter sees those beliefs as untrue and wrong, than for someone who does not believe?

In modern society slavery, or women being the property of a father / husband is seen as morally wrong, yet these beliefs are supported as moral by the OT / NT.

You will notice that you won't see these same level of oppositions against any other belief system, where people who hold the worldly opinion would be so motivated and compelled as to try and convince believers that their faith is wrong.

No matter what you may ask or what you say that contradicts my beliefs, you are wrong, I am the voice of Christ, believe or you are going to be eternally punished, I Topher as the voice of the Lord have spoken.

Regardless of your beliefs and views, is it not tasteless for CNN to run this as their lead story on Easter morning??? Americans are appalled by anything done to insult Islam believers, so why is this felt to be appropriate??? There is nothing wrong with the article, but its timing makes it a poor and inflammatory choice of journalism, and would be taken as «persecution» if was directed toward any other belief system.

I think that it is wrong to go on a public forum and disrespect something as important as the belief in God.

It does not matter what someone believes, since your belief does not effect what is actually there, and since what I propose as a possibility, you very well could be harming people with YOUR prayers for the wrong god.

If you were as private with your supernatural beliefs as you wanted those with conflicting faiths to be, you'd never have to hear how silly, wrong, and potentially harmful others find your beliefs.

You have all right to believe as you do as do I. And I do belief in the precepts of Scripture, you do not have too, and you have that right not to but it does nt mean that your veiw is right for you have a right to be wrong.

This is the United States of America, land of the free, last I checked... I don't force my personal beliefs on anyone else, nor do I expect others to force their personal beliefs on me... This family is not harming anyone in living their life following THEIR beliefs... Who gives ANYONE else the right to say they're WRONG because they choose to share their lives as they do?

Secondly, as a priest ordained in Rome where he knows that the Basilica would be totally against his assertion, he uses euphemisms to cloud the mind of a reader thinking quoting wrong scriptures with the intent to seduce would suffice — his own roots denounce his deeds and / or beliefs but he axiomatically wants to hold both the roots and wings to no avail, read the book and the truth shall set you free... This is exactly what happens when a gay priest turned professor what to justify his perverted lifestyle... I rest my case

And as I said before, if you ignore the wrongs done in the name of religious beliefs, you are condoning them.

Of course you can be proven wrong... your holy book was written by man, no god involved; thus your belief is based on the fairy tales told by men who saw a gullible fool a mile away - see, how easy that is??? As for the actual number being only 1.6 billion, sorry the stats say different and your opinion on who the actual number includes is moot.

except your wrong... this many gods objection was brought up in Pascal's time... and he explicitly rejected it because he maintained that christianity is unlike all those other religions and if they examined it in detail they would realize as much... youre twisting pascal's own beliefs... he very much was postulating that either the christian god existed or it didn't

there is certainly nothing wrong with the belief that jesus was a good philosopher once you dismiss all the magical stores as fiction.

I repeat: I hope I am wrong; but I am, all the same, beginning to wonder if the warm support with which even quite unexpected people in our hierarchy (like Bishop Hollis) greeted the establishment of the Ordinariate this time round (you will remember the hostility with which they squashed a similar but less radical basic idea in the Nineties) was really as wholehearted as it seemed at the time: or were they simply saying what they knew the Pope wanted them to say, but without any real belief in the idea itself?

Not to mention every verse in the Bible that asserts that God is in control of the universe, that he is the one who is responsible for unbelief as well as belief, that he created both good AND EVIL, would be wrong, meaning the Bible would be fallible, meaning that the validity of everything else inside it would be called into question as well.

Secondly, as a priest ordained in Rome where he knows that the Basilica would be totally against his assertion, he uses euphemisms to cloud the mind of a reader thinking quoting wrong scriptures with the intent to seduce would suffice — his own roots denounce his deeds and / or beliefs but he axiomatically wants to hold both the roots and wings to no avail, read the book and the truth shall set you free... I rest my case

Faith based beliefs don't afford such a luxury as admitting they are wrong, because they don't rely on evidence, but on human «feeling.»

Brian and Alden... let's not forget that the early church believed in the imminent return of the Lord... it appears somebody was wrong... how wd that belief affect the message on what was to be accepted as the gospel in the interim?

a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)

Two things: (1) that I place myself firmly and staunchly within the Church and the Christian faith; and (2) that I am firmly and staunchly convinced that much of what the Church has taught as doctrine for most of its twenty centuries, and much of what constitutes orthodox belief today, is just plain wrong.

Am not anti-Christ nor Anti-Jewish just like all Muslims am a monotheist so must be rather Anti-Polytheists & Disbelievers... but believe me it is not hatred but rather pityness for the innocents and hardness towards the wicked transgressors... Guess that is all about it unless few of our brother got the message wrong!?! Since we learned from the Quran verses that there will be in paradise from the Jews, Christian and others from other beliefs... and since God forgives any thing else other than to assign for him partners as polytheists do, then that means many of Christians and Jews are monotheist towards God although might show otherwise of fears from dominant doctrine... As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that Trinity to correct it to show as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...as polytheists do, then that means many of Christians and Jews are monotheist towards God although might show otherwise of fears from dominant doctrine... As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that Trinity to correct it to show as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that Trinity to correct it to show as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...as Three as now and for eternity...as now and for eternity...!?

I dropped «christianity» from my life starting as a child after I read some childrens bible that showed «God» destroying some people who were worshipping an «idol» — Even at the age of 8 I knew it was wrong to kill those who do nt follow your beliefs.

Just a note: to my two responses regarding my belief as a Christian, I received 18 responses to why I am wrong.

You sound as a very angry person... and you come across as though your beliefs are what counts... every think others have a right to their opinion... or the possibility exist you are wrong.

Even my very conservative Roman Catholic brother gave me kudos when I said that if nothing else, as a Baptist, my two cherished beliefs were in soul liberty and seperation of church and state... so, if god was there and I was completly wrong not to believe in him, then at least he knew every step of my journey, and in the end my salvation, or lack of it, was between me and god.

As soon as I saw that I knew it was going to be an article criticizing those who question the presidents» beliefs, and that it would also call into question the whole notion of there being a right or wrong brand of ChristianitAs soon as I saw that I knew it was going to be an article criticizing those who question the presidents» beliefs, and that it would also call into question the whole notion of there being a right or wrong brand of Christianitas I saw that I knew it was going to be an article criticizing those who question the presidents» beliefs, and that it would also call into question the whole notion of there being a right or wrong brand of Christianity.

Nothing wrong with it so long as you don't validate your abuse of others by citing your own belief system.

You only see abortion as wrong because your religious belief system has persuaded you to preclude logic with fairy tales.

The whole point of it was to demonstrate out how misguided it is to label anyone as being «right» or «wrong» in the Christian beliefs.

either something is wrong with you (as an agent in your system of belief) or something is inherently wrong with the system itself.

My family members who are still very much a part of the christian belief system and we avoid any discussion because I must be wrong or misinformed not to believe as they do.

On the other hand people of religion who are «Sure» that their belief is the only one are just as wrong.

It's this kind of over the top judgement, holding others to your personal religious beliefs, that are responsible for so many Americans today feeling that religion in general has nothing to offer besides bigotry, judgement, and a sad credo that everyone who doesn't think exactly as you do is wrong and evil.

the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.

Today's world man has become with no value other than his organs if sold or stolen... so what is happening only proves that we are imposing marketing the wrongs against the rights... cultures and beliefs are going down the drain with all those values, morals, virtues some how turning into commotion among cultures and beliefs turning against each other misunderstanding each other or unaware of cultures way of living and beliefs to ease communication mutual understanding as a nation of mankind and a nation of faiths.

In this battle, a view which presupposes that it is not only impossible but wrong for authority to protect and further common beliefs and ways of life gains increasing control of our imagination, and as it does it erodes the foundations necessary for a church to remain a church.

People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad person by nature), the religious wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR beliefs (change to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone says they will pray for me... its the same as saying I'm going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.

It sends the wrong signal to those victims who either didn't believe in a religion or who believed in a different religion; that their religion or beliefs are not as important.

As an example, from your point of view as a believer, I can assume you think atheists are wrong, and you are right in your belief that god existAs an example, from your point of view as a believer, I can assume you think atheists are wrong, and you are right in your belief that god existas a believer, I can assume you think atheists are wrong, and you are right in your belief that god exists.

So long as the prevailing view is that they are not necessarily wrong, public policy in a pluralistic system must be indifferent to any beliefs that can not be independently supported by rational (utilitarian) argument.

Displaying it in a religious sense (or a position that symbolizes as such) is wrong and disrespectful to those who hold other beliefs.

He may at times offer a tad of pseudo humility and claim that he knows that he hasn't cornered the market on doctrinal correctness, but as soon as you offer an alternative explanation that counters his belief, he lets you know that you are wrong.

L Rivera is right, I guess mormons aren't christians... I just looked up the definition of a christian, and then the mormon beliefs, and they do match exactly... but... I also looked up L Rivera, and as it turns out, he is allowed to change definitions based on personal belief... turns out we're all wrong, and so is logic... damn... so many periods, and idiots

I also have my own expectations and beliefs that rub others the wrong way but I don't demand or expect others to do as I say.