Sentences with phrase «as young earth»

I can almost always predict what silly reasoning AGW denialists will use, because I'm already familiar with the reasoning used by AIDS denialists and other science denialists (such as young Earth creationists); Denialists tend draw on the same pool of tactics.

Their textbooks promote nonfactual and revisionist history as well as Young Earth creationism and climate change denial.

On the other hand, ideas such as young earth creationism should not be taught as scientifically valid for the very simple reason that they are not.

As young earth creationists often do, he points to «gaps in the fossil record» as a flaw in evolutionary biology.

Mastropaolo belongs to the subset of creationists known as Young Earth creationists, who believe that Earth and its inhabitants were created by God some several thousand years ago - an account of which is laid out in the book of Genesis, in the Bible's Old Testament.

If a professor of evolutionary biology announced that they were going to spend the next year as a young earth creationist, they'd lose their job and their peers would likely deride the decision.

One can get easily confused, as the young earth don't is used very often here; although it is sometimes indistinguishable from the sarcasm font, I will admit.

Not exact matches

@Topher It seems that before Ken Ham started his own project over there at AIG, he worked for the Insti / tute for Creation Research, which basically does the same thing as the Discovery Insti / tute — namely, try to create a «sciencey» veneer for Young Earth Creationism.

An Australian geologist who got his credentials dating rocks billions of years old, still selling his services as a qualified geologist, but also employed as as a «Creationist Assistant Professor of Geology» by the Institute for Creation Research in the USA, where he supports a young earth.

Perhaps you can disprove certain beliefs, such as the «young earth» idea, but at the core level science and religion are not in conflict.

The percentage of actual young earth creationists (Christian fundamentalists) has been declining steadily as more information is readily available.

As I sat alone in a room wondering f I was living my last day on earth — the things that went through my head were exactly what this author touched upon in her article and that I had felt during my illness in my younger days.

It takes a comedic outlook to even attempt to consider what young - earth creationists purport as serious.

[6] Although many young Earth creationists (YECs) are active in the development of creation science, an endeavor that holds that the events as - sociated with supernatural creation can be evidenced and modeled through an interpretation of the scientific method, the consensus among scientists is that creation science is unscientific in both conception and methodology.

Reading breathless media reports about CO2 «pollution» and about minimizing our carbon footprints, one might think that the earth can not have too little CO2, as Simpson thought one couldn't be too thin — a view which was also overstated, as we have seen from the sad effects of anorexia in so many young women.

During the «Younger Dryas» some 12,000 years ago, the earth very dramatically cooled and warmed by as much as 10 degrees Celsius in fifty years.

fred — my characterization of topher as a liar is unrelated to the young vs old earth debate.

I'm as keen as anyone for a discussion about old earth / young earth (i'm a young earther for the record — at least I think I am But rather than all this constant intellectual bollix, let's sort out some of these basic issues first.

As I've said many times before, I'm not particularly interested in converting young earth creationists into evolutionary creationists.I believe that Christians should be able to fellowship together in love and unity regardless of their various positions on the interpretation of Genesis Being neither an Old Testament scholar nor a scientist, I'll leave that debate up to the experts.

This is the same as someone a couple of hundred years ago saying that because all Christian religions had thus far been «young earth» in nature that Christianity and young - earthism are the same thing.

I.e., Andrew Snelling who obtained credentials for his expertise as a geologist in dating things, but who simultaneously worked for one of the big «young - earth» groups.

Im from canada and I know very well that many people here hold to young earth creationism as well..

In this way, young earth creationism is demonstrably incorrect as a theory.

E.g., in regards to scientific support for evolution and rejection of creationism and the young earth dogma, in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, signed an amicus curiae brief asking the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of creationism, which the brief described as embodying religious dogma.

Nearly half of those at schools favoring young - earth creation chose this option, as did a fifth of those at schools favoring progressive creation and a third of those at schools that favor both progressive and young - earth creation.

Actually Jerry, sorry, I noticed Cecilia did call you a young - earth moron, so I guess that can be interpreted as an insult, unless it's new creationist sect that I hadn't heard of.

Yeah, John, nothing will change the biblical statements that the earth is flat (as well as round), and is young.

You know, I know a lot of decent, hard - working Christians, but this young - earth belief is, as they say, willful stupidity / ignorance / charlatanism or some combo of the three.

As I said earlier today on this blog, it's not «creationism» that's being rejected per se, but rather «young earth» creationism.

As you may know from my One Verse Podcast in which I am currently working through Genesis 3, and my literal understanding of Genesis 1 - 3 ends up being quite different than the way Young Earth Creationists understanding these opening chapters of the Bible.

I'm aware that young earth creationists, such as Ken Ham, try to make the story less implausible by stating that the story refers to «kinds» or «baramins».

Most Young Earth Creationists (Creationists who believe the earth is less than 10,000 years old) believe that the Grand Canyon was formed by the waters of the flood as recorded in Genesis 6Earth Creationists (Creationists who believe the earth is less than 10,000 years old) believe that the Grand Canyon was formed by the waters of the flood as recorded in Genesis 6earth is less than 10,000 years old) believe that the Grand Canyon was formed by the waters of the flood as recorded in Genesis 6 - 8.

Not even the majority of Creationists are Young Earth Creationists, and most Christians accept evolution but believe it was how God made life as we know it.

Why are you acting as if Rubio is running his campaign based on young earth creation?

We may not be able to definitively determine that it's 13.5 billion years old, but we sure as hell can definitively determine that it's older than what young earth creationists believe it is.

AiG's main thrust is NOT «young Earth» as such; our emphasis is on Biblical authority.

«I want to make it VERY clear that we don't want to be known primarily as «young - Earth creationists.»

«During all this time I was never joined in profession of religion with any, but gave up myself to the Lord, having forsaken all evil company, taking leave of father and mother, and all other relations, and traveled up and down as a stranger on the earth, which way the Lord inclined my heart; taking a chamber to myself in the town where I came, and tarrying sometimes more, sometimes less in a place: for I durst not stay long in a place, being afraid both of professor and profane, lest, being a tender young man, I should be hurt by conversing much with either.

If someone believed the earth was twenty nine times younger then what scientists say they would not be incorrect so long as they were basing it on Saturn but we would all say the person was really stupid.

Even as a young man you feel this but, as you grow older and see more and more of what Keats called «the giant agony of the world,» you will feel ever more deeply the seeming contradiction between Christian faith and the hideous, tragic evil on this earth.

When they receive their crowns, their dominions, they then will be prepared to frame earths like unto ours and to people them in the same manner as we have been brought forth by our parents, by our Father and God» (Discourses of Brigham Young, p. 283; Journal of Discourses 18:259)

Dr. Austin, the «scientist» in question, is a young earth creationist who went to the site with the stated purpose of finding «proof against evolution,» gathered material which was a mix of newly formed rock and ancient rock which had been ejected from the mountain, dated them with imprecise methods, and then skewed the results, as thousands of actual scientists have already reported.

This is no surprise, as that appears to be the standard advice to «Young Earth Creationists» when they are challenged with questions about genesis — as in don't believe believe anything outside the bible, all that you need to know is in the bible.

I also believe that the Bible is meant to be taken as allegory, not scientific fact, and that young earth creationists and evolution deniers are among the dumbest people on the planet.

As a young evangelical myself, I confess I have grown tired... no, weary... of responding to comments like these with some honest suggestions for how my fellow evangelicals might avoid said retirement, only to be discounted and disparaged for believing the earth is more than 6,000 years old, for voting for Democrats from time to time, and for daring to serve communion to gays and lesbians.

My parents never really pushed young earth creationism on me nor taught that it was a fundamental element of the Christian faith, but for most of my life I travelled in circles where it was assumed that good Christians embraced a literal interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2, which describes the earth as being created in six days.

He had not thought of them as individuals — young men and women who fall in love and want homes, folks who have babies and cherish for them the same ambitions which he feels for his, human beings who find this earth a perplexed and tangled place in which to live, and who want more leisure, more comfort, and more liberty.

I refuse to belive that I am the only man on Earth who doesn't see in Vardy nothing else than just an old player who have a good season at a little team who have no presure in games this season.We need a young classy player not a cheap solution for the bench to replace Welbeck when he is injuried.To replace who?Welbeck?He is the best solution for Arsenal?A team who play in UCL and want the title, realy?Walcott is good enough for the bench we don't need to buy any reserve, we are not Leicester to buy some players and pray for a miracle.We need to wake the **** up or we will have the same destiny as AC Milan, AS Roma, Manchester United, Liverpool, Chelsea, etcas AC Milan, AS Roma, Manchester United, Liverpool, Chelsea, etcAS Roma, Manchester United, Liverpool, Chelsea, etc..

I hate comments such as earth mother or hippy, it is natural to feed our young we are mammals after all, does it matter how long we feed them for?

Key to the basin's identification as a potential impact crater are the decrease in the strength of Earth's gravity over the site, indicating a large basin filled with younger low - density sediments, and a strong increase in the strength of Earth's magnetism at the site.