Sentences with phrase «as your opponent does»

He is clearly desperate for his players to hit the ground running tomorrow and not break stride as our opponents did in their defeat by Man United in their last game.

This is a two - player board game where you take turns moving three characters to the other side of the board as your opponent does the same but in the opposite direction.

I do not believe that «the science is settled», as my opponent does.

This election cycle will be different, I believe, as my opponent doesn't have the [same] name recognition and popularity as my opponent in 2012.

Not exact matches

Takeaway: What looks like a mistake may be nothing but a feint, and if your opponent fails to keep their guard up because they don't see you as a threat, you can mop the floor with them before they know what hit them.

He knows that if his opponents don't take him seriously, all sorts of great things can happen: they may not prepare as well for debates, work as hard to win certain states or pay attention to what they're saying as carefully as they should.

«He's looking at this as showing he still can be king of the hill, because we don't have the votes to override,» Republican Sen. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, a vocal opponent of Obama's climate change agenda, said in an interview.

Tillerson responded to the questions, along with others about Putin's opponents winding up dead, with what's likely to become a familiar refrain for the executive as more allegations about Russia come to the fore: «I do not have sufficient information to make that claim.»

Lopez Obrador's party, Morena, has dismissed the suggestion it has ideological or political sympathies for Venezuela's socialist government, but this year, opponents in Mexico have played up purported links between the two, as they did to him before the 2006 election.

That's why innovation in Laozian terms doesn't come from seeing a given situation — a landscape, a relationship, an industry — as unchanging, and then coming up with a fresh tactic within that stable situation to neutralize an opponent.

Trump may always be despised by his opponents, but that does not bother him as much as they may think.

A state - run paper, the Global Times, did mention the leaks today in criticizing the Western press, which it said was using the news to sully Western opponents such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose associates were said to have laundered a suspected $ 2 billion through offshore accounts.

In addition, opponents are often happy to point out alternatives such as bitcoin cash already exist, do not need yet another software solution (no matter how elegant), and can scale just fine.

So his strategy is to get the focus off himself, as LBJ did (and Nixon did in 1972) by demonizing his opponent as less than decent and real dangerous.

Also, he disrespects her as a wrestler and an opponent by choosing to forfeit» No, I don't think he was worried about losing to her.

This program gives Wilson many opponents: anti-functionalists among theorists and historians of religion (it's no accident that among theorists of religion Wilson chooses arch-functionalist Émile Durkheim as his hero); evolutionary theorists who don't think that such theory is usefully applicable to social groups; those who think it is applicable to social groups, but conclude that religious groups are maladaptive; and theological realists, who think the whole enterprise vitiated by its procedural naturalism.

Mussolini may have modified Italian fascism, but the softening of its totalitarianism did not necessarily mean a turn to democratic rule, as a myriad of exiles and opponents of the regime revealed only too well.

It doesn't intend to dismantle the opponent's position, except insofar as the opponent's raison d'être is enmity.

As an independant (and an opponent of the two party system) I don't get a say in who the Republican nominee is.

Just like religion, it is based in emotions, so if your opponent doesn't get emotional about it, it backfires horribly (as it just did with Troll).

As you can see, Christians advocating for the preservation of slavery did not characterize their abolitionist opponents as simply disagreeing with them on the interpretation of the biblical text, but instead tended to accuse them of not taking the Bible seriously at alAs you can see, Christians advocating for the preservation of slavery did not characterize their abolitionist opponents as simply disagreeing with them on the interpretation of the biblical text, but instead tended to accuse them of not taking the Bible seriously at alas simply disagreeing with them on the interpretation of the biblical text, but instead tended to accuse them of not taking the Bible seriously at all.

This story is not up to date and isn't entirely accurate to portraying the fact that the opponents are traditional Jews (both men and women) who do not want there to be egalitarian space for the women to pray as they wish.

As the opponents of Marcion pointed out, right reading has as much, or more, to do with ecclesiology and confession as with method and virtuositAs the opponents of Marcion pointed out, right reading has as much, or more, to do with ecclesiology and confession as with method and virtuositas much, or more, to do with ecclesiology and confession as with method and virtuositas with method and virtuosity.

consider the opposite (as most scholars do): intentionally reading not only those with whom you agree, but familiarizing yourself with your opponents» best arguments.

Perhaps coincidentally, Flake is doing badly against his Republican primary opponent, even though her behavior is a reminder that the best argument against conservative populism is the people who run as conservative populists.

The tea partiers are taken as the latest conclusive evidence that the party of conservatism is simply the party of those who already have whatever human beings want to have — cosmic opponents of the party of those who do not yet have those things.

Thus Paul's emissary, as the icon of Paul - in - the - letter, would be able to put the audience in the presence of the holy in a way Paul's opponents did in their performances and thereby place the Pauline apostolate on equal ground with its rivals.

How is it possible to affirm, as Christians traditionally have done, that the violent death of Jesus is central to God's eternal plan for human salvation and, simultaneously, that God is not responsible for the murderous anger of Jesus's opponents, the savage brutality of the Roman guards, or the greedy betrayal of Judas Iscariot?

And, as always, Rand's opponents attack her for things she never said or did.

But I can think of no context — and Griffin offers us no examples of contexts — in which FWTs don't apply exactly the same criteria for determining justified belief to the positions of their opponents as they apply to their own.

In particular, as the late Victor Lowe patiently and quietly maintained throughout his lifetime — and as Donald Sherburne has forcefully and convincingly demonstrated in his many writings — theism was not an essential component of Whitehead's thought, and the viability of process metaphysics does not stand or fall on the issue of theism alone (as the vast majority of process philosophers and opponents of process philosophy and its brands of philosophical theism stubbornly continue to maintain).

To speak of something called «Christian America,» as both the advocates and the opponents of this idea are nowadays at high levels of passion wont to do, is by itself evidence of how un-Christian the country has become.

When she was running for the Senate, her opponent brought that up: «The feminists in New York City have turned against you because you did not walk away from your husband after he humiliated you as no other woman in America has ever been humiliated.

But what do the opponents of capital punishment propose as an alternative?

It was a panel of unscrupulous church «fathers» who destroyed other books that were equally inspired by God but didn't agree with their favorites; who were inspired by God to stifle dissent by persecuting and even murdering those who disagreed with them, just as God in his wisdom inspired the infanticide and genocide described in the Old Testament; just as God inspired the Crusades and the Inquisition, just as God now inspires those currently working to establish a global Islamic state to eliminate their opponents.

And so, after a long afternoon's journey into night, butting our heads against first one goalpost, then the other, we had to admit that the opponent wanted the game more than we did, that in fact they had more guts, and as the sensible team we were, we began to take ourselves out of the chaotic field «with honor.»

What happens if an opponent of the faith objects to this dogma claiming that it is a contradiction because, as he understands it, the dogma claims that three equals one and, as any first grade student of mathematics knows, three does not equal one, but three.

«So, for instance, when Cornwell sets out in Hitler's Pope to prove Pius an anti-Semite (an accusation even the pontiff's bitterest opponents have rarely levelled), he makes much of Pacelli's reference in a 1917 letter to the «Jewish cult» — as though for an Italian Catholic prelate born in 1876 the word «cult» had the same resonances it has in English today, and as though Cornwell himself does not casually refer to the Catholic cult of the Assumption and the cult of the Virgin Mary.»

While critics have characterized such protections as a «license» to discriminate, religious liberty experts state that the memo — while a major move — does not do everything that advocates have hoped or that opponents have feared.

That he had theological opponents did not lead him to think he might be wrong — he thought they were wrong, as his treatment of them showed.

Speaking of telling lies, a really good way to do this is to rephrase what your opponent says and then keep repeating the misquote in hopes that he or she will get bored and leave your lie as the last statement.

Supplying selective information that is reframed to position a corporation or other entity in unfavourable light so as to encourage it to press for changes is a tactic adopted by some social change and environmental organisations, yet it is the sort of things those lobbies accuse their opponents of doing.

The best thing about WKU's defense in 2017 is that it prevented big gains nearly as well as WKU's opponents did.

Can Arsenal bring their own devastation to European opponents FC Koln as Chelsea did last night?

Monreal tries to go as many time in the box as Gibbs does, while Gibbs (in my opinion) possesses a better accelleration and «eye» for the opponent's counter in terms of timing.

In Mahrez case, he is definitely a wide attacking player, who goes by opponents as if they are not there, has good technical abilities, a wonderful left foot, and does score goals, probably would score more in a team like Arsenal.

Aw has lost the plot with his tactics as well.Teams read him and play us out of games.We only tend to play well when opponents give us room to play in the midfield — like Everton did.When opponents park the bus and cramp out Ozil and Sanchez, Wenger doesn't have a plan.All the possession and no goals wont win you games.

According to the TV pundits, though, he should not have done it and that selfie could well come back to hurt Arsenal as our opponents use it to drive them on when they play us.

Pre-Season doesn't mean that you stand and watch as a ball breaks out of your penalty area and continue to watch as your opponent is allowed to have a shot at your goal without anyone bothering to close him down... Pathetic defending... again!!

If d team has 3players that as d strength n skill of Kolasinac just imagine what they would do to their opponents.